The Flipped Classroom
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 14 June 2019

The Flipped Classroom

Vali Ilie

University of Craiova, Romania

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.02.02.72

Pages: 395-407

Keywords: Flipped Classroom, Just-in-Time Teaching, Peer Instruction, Technology, Constructivism

Abstract

The knowledge society requires greater connectivity between individuals and communities. Becoming indispensable for the development of all human activities, the new information and communication technologies are increasingly encountered in the educational practice. Essentially, "flipping the classroom" means that the students are initially exposed to new materials outside the classroom, usually by presenting informational content or videos and then use their time in the classroom to do the harder work, assimilating this knowledge by solving problems, discussions or debates. Starting from the specificity of the flipped classroom, we have proposed to test the views of the students enrolled in the Department of Teacher Training of the University of Craiova, on this subject. By applying an opinion questionnaire, we obtained information about two indicators we referred to: the extent to which the students know the characteristics of the flipped classroom and their attitude regarding the implementation of this approach. For a better "radiography," we turned to the SWOT Analysis and disseminated the resulted information in order to implement this form of mixed learning in the activities with the students of the Faculty of Sciences, enrolled in the module of psycho-pedagogical training.

References

  1. Beck, I., McKeown, M. G., Sandora, C., Kucan L., & Worthy, J. (1996). Questioning the author: A year-long classroom implementation to engage students in text. Elementary School Journal, 96 (4), 385-414.

  2. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A., (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

  3. Cheng, G. (2016). An empirical study towards understanding user acceptance of bring your own device (BYOD) in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32 (4), 1-17.

  4. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970-977.

  5. Cullen R., Harris M, & Hill, R. (2012). The Learner-Centered Curriculum: Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  6. Deslauriers L., Schelew E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862-864.

  7. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Dillenbourg, P. (ed.), Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier

  8. Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip Your Classroom to Improve Student Learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39 (8), 12-17.

  9. Garrison, D., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.

  10. Gee, J. P. (2005). Pleasure, learning, video games, and life: the projective stance. E-Learn, 2 (3), 211.

  11. Herreid, C., & Schiller, N. (2013). Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43631584. Accessed February 25.

  12. Kazlauskas, A., & Robinson, K. (2012). Podcasts are not for everyone. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43 (2). 321-330.

  13. Kay, R. H. (2014). Developing a Framework for Creating Effective Instructional Video Podcasts. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9 (1), 22-30.

  14. King, A. (1993). From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching, 41 (1), 30-35.

  15. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31 (1), 30-43.

  16. Luttenberger, S., Macher, D., Maidl, V., Rominger, C., Aydin, N., & Paechter, M. (2018). Different patterns of university students’ integration of lecture podcasts, learning materials, and lecture attendance in a psychology course, 23, (1), 165–178.

  17. Marinescu, M. (2007). Trends and orientations in modern didactics, București: EDP.

  18. Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1 (1), 12–21. 

  19. Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  20. Michaelsen, L. K. (1992). Team learning: A comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. To Improve the Academy, 11, 107-122.

  21. Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A., & Fink, L. D. (2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups. Westport, CT: Praeger.

  22. Novak, G., Patterson, E.T., Gavrin, A.D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  23. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf. Accessed  April 17.

  24. Talbert, R. (2012). Inverted classroom. Colleagues, 9 (1), 1-3.

  25. Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19 (2), 128–143.

  26. Youngberg, D. (2012). Why Online Education Won’t Replace College-Yet. Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Online-Education-Wont/133531/. Accessed February 11.

bottom of page