top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
open access

Published: 04 April 2022

The Impact of Augmented Reality-Based Argumentation Activities on Middle School Students’ Academic Achievement and Motivation in Science Classes

Tuba Demircioglu, Memet Karakus, Sedat Ucar

Cukurova University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 22-34

Keywords: Augmented Reality, Argumentation, Science Education, Astronomy Education, Academic Achievement, Motivation


Science teaching is one of the subjects that has been actively affected by Augmented Reality (AR) technology worldwide. Although the use of AR in science courses is increasing, the effective use of AR still needs improvement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of augmented reality-based argumentation activities in 7th grade students' academic achievement and motivation in teaching astronomy content. The quasi-experimental design was used in this study. The participants consisted of 79 seventh-grade students from three different science classes. The students in experimental group 1 (n=26) participated in an instruction that included both augmented reality and argumentation activities about astronomy. The students in experimental group 2 (n=27) participated in an astronomy instruction that includes only argumentation activities and the students in control group (n=27) received astronomy instruction through traditional methods. The data were collected through pre-and post- academic achievement test and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to determine the statistical differences between the pretest and posttest scores of the students. The results showed that augmented reality-based argumentation activities were more effective in increasing students' achievement and motivation than the argumentation and traditional instruction in teaching astronomy.


  1. Abdüsselam, M. S., & Karal, H. (2012). The effect of mixed reality environments on the students’ academic achievement in physics education: 11th grade magnetism topic example. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(4), 170-181.

  2. Akpınar, Y., Ardaç, D., & Er-Amuce, N. (2014). Development and validation of an argumentation based multimedia science learning environment: preliminary findings. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3848-3853.

  3. Aktamış, H., & Arıcı, V. A. (2013). The effects of using virtual reality software in teaching astronomy subjects on academic achievement and retention. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 58-70.

  4. Applegate, A. J., & Applegate, M. D. (2010). A study of thoughtful literacy and the motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 64(4), 226-234.

  5. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355-385.

  6. Baran, B., Yecan, E., Kaptan, B., & Paşayiğit, O. (2020). Using augmented reality to teach fifth grade students about electrical circuits. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1371-1385.

  7. Cai, H. (2013). Using augmented reality games as motivators for youth environmental education: An American Hart's tongue fern conservation project. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, New York.

  8. Cai, S., Chiang, F. K., & Wang, X. (2013). Using the augmented reality 3D technique for a convex imaging experiment in a physics course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 858-865.

  9. Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. C. (2021). Effects of learning physics using Augmented Reality on students’ self‐efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235-251.

  10. Chang, S. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226-239.

  11. Chen, S. Y., & Liu, S. Y. (2020). Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106418.

  12. Chen, C. H., Yang, J. C., Shen, S., & Jeng, M. C. (2007). A Desktop Virtual Reality Earth Motion System in Astronomy Education. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (3), 289-304.

  13. Chiang, T.H.C., Yang, S.J.H., & Hwang, G.J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365.

  14. Clark, D. B., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Menekse, M., & Erkens, G. (2007). Technology-enhanced learning environments to support students' argumentation. In S. Erduran & M.P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. (pp. 217–243). Springer.

  15. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.) London: RoutledgeFalmer.

  16. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.

  17. Erduran, S. (2020). Science education in the era of a pandemic: how can history, philosophy and sociology of science contribute to education for understanding and solving the Covid-19 crisis? Science & Education, 29, 233–235.

  18. Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2006). Automatic coding of communication in collaboration protocols. Proceedings of the 7th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2006), Bloomington, IN.

  19. Fleck, S., & Simon, G. (2013, November). An augmented reality environment for astronomy learning in elementary grades: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine (p. 14). ACM.

  20. Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 103635.

  21. Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 1–13.

  22. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage Publications.

  23. Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2005). What is happening with boys in school? Teachers College Record.

  24. Hamilton, K., & Olenewa, J. (2010). Augmented reality in education [PowerPoint slides]. Lecture Notes Online Web site: http://www. authorstream. com/Presentation/k3hamilton-478823-augmented-reality-in-education.

  25. Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Chen, C. C., & Tu, N. T. (2016). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students' learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895-1906.

  26. Jan, M. (2009). Designing an augmented reality game-based curriculum for argumentation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  27. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2003). Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 205-226). Springer.

  28. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.

  29. Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308.

  30. Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., & Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students' use of technology. Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008, 484-492.

  31. Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(3-4), 163-174.

  32. Kirikkaya, E. B., & Başgül, M. Ş. (2019). The effect of the use of augmented reality applications on the academic success and motivation of 7th grade students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(3), 362.

  33. Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203-228.

  34. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of educational research, 61(2), 179-211.

  35. Lu, S. J., Liu, Y. C., Chen, P. J., & Hsieh, M. R. (2020). Evaluation of AR embedded physical puzzle game on students’ learning achievement and motivation on elementary natural science. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 451-463.

  36. Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive science, 5(4), 333-369.

  37. Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Owens, M. C. (2012). The two faces of scientific argumentation: Applications to global climate change. In Perspectives on scientific argumentation (pp. 17-37). Springer, Dordrecht.

  38. Oestermeier, U. & Hesse, F. W. (2000). Verbal and visual causal arguments. Cognition, 75(1), 65-104.

  39. Oleksiuk, V.P. & Oleksiuk, O.R. (2020). Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching school computer science. In Burov, O.Yu., Kiv, A.E. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education (AREdu 2020) (pp. 91-107).

  40. Palmer, D. (1999). Students' perceptions of high quality science teaching. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(3), 41.

  41. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2011). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.

  42. Parker, J. & Heywood, D. (1998). The earth and beyond: developing primary teachers' understanding of basic astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 503-520.

  43. Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., Kazanidis, I., & Wells, D. (2019). Augmenting the learning experience in primary and secondary school education: A systematic review of recent trends in augmented reality game-based learning. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 329-346.

  44. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813.

  45. Radu, I., & Schneider, B. (2019, May). What Can We Learn from Augmented Reality (AR)? Benefits and Drawbacks of AR for Inquiry-based Learning of Physics. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-12).

  46. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.

  47. Romano, M., Díaz, P., & Aedo, I. (2020). Empowering teachers to create augmented reality experiences: the effects on the educational experience. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18.

  48. Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students' achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144, 103710.

  49. Shelton, B. E. & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. In Augmented Reality Toolkit, The First IEEE International Workshop (pp. 1-8). Darmstadt, Germany: IEEE.

  50. Sin, A. K. & Zaman, H. B. (2010, June). Live Solar System (LSS): Evaluation of an Augmented Reality book-based educational tool. In Information Technology (ITSim), 2010 International Symposium in (Vol. 1, pp. 1-6). IEEE.

  51. Sirakaya, M., & Kiliç Çakmak, E. (2018). Investigating Student Attitudes toward Augmented Reality. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 30-44.

  52. Squire, K. D. & Jan, M. (2007). Mad City Mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 5-29.

  53. Sungur, S. (2004). The implementation of problem-based learning in secondary school biology courses. Unpublished dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  54. Thornton, T., Ernst, J. V., & Clark, A. C. (2012). Augmented reality as a visual and spatial learning tool in technology education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 18-21.

  55. Voss, J. F., & Means, M. L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and instruction, 1(4), 337-350.

  56. Walker, J. P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argument‐driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 561-596.

  57. Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & education, 62, 41-49.

  58. Yen, J. C., Tsai, C. H., & Wu, M. (2013). Augmented Reality in the higher education: students’ science concept learning and academic achievement in astronomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 165-173.

  59. Yildirim, I., & Kapucu, M. S. (2021). The Effect of Augmented Reality Applications in Science Education on Academic Achievement and Retention of 6th Grade Students. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 7(1), 56-71.

  60. Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Elinich, K. (2017). How augmented reality enables conceptual understanding of challenging science content. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 156-168.

  61. Yuen, S., Yaoyuneyong, G. & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 119-140.Wells, A. (2009). Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression in psychology. Guilford Press.

bottom of page