The Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers' Online Self-Regulation Skills and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Skills
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 23 December 2022

The Relationship Between Pre-Service Teachers' Online Self-Regulation Skills and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Skills

Hale Sucuoğlu

Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.677

Pages: 456-467

Keywords: Pre-Service Teacher, Online Self-Regulation Skills, Cognitive Emotion Regulation

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the relationship between online self-regulatory learning skills and cognitive skills of regulating emotions. It has been examined that if there is a difference in the gender variable between online self-regulatory learning skills and cognitive emotion regulation skills of pre-service teachers and a meaningful relationship between the online self-regulatory learning skills and cognitive emotion regulation skills in terms of this purpose. It is a descriptive relational research. The sample this research is 434 pre-service teachers studying in the faculty of education. In this research, Online Self-Regulatory Learning Scale and Cognitive Emotion Regulating Scale has been used as a data collection tool. As a result of this research, it is seen that there is a significant difference in favor of female pre-service teacher on gender variable within the scope of online self- regulatory skills. When the sub-dimensions are searched it has seen that there is a significant difference in “environment structuring”, “task strategies”, “time management” sub-dimensions. When the cognitive emotion regulation skills of pre-service teachers have been examined according to the gender variable it is stated that there is a significant difference in favor of female pre-service teachers in “putting into perspective” sub-dimension. According to this result, it was determined that female pre-service teachers thought that "everything could have been worse, others had experienced worse events, their last experience was not as bad as the previous ones, and there were worse things in life" than male pre-service teachers.

References

  1. Artsın, M., Koçdar, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Öğrenenlerin öz-yönetimli öğrenme becerilerinin kitlesel açık  çevrimiçi dersler bağlamında incelenmesi). [Examination of Self-Regulated Learning Skills of Learners in  the Context of Massive Open Online Courses]. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences  International, 10(1), 1-30.

  2. Ataman, E. (2011). The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in determining the level of depression and  anxiety against stressful life events [Unpublished master thesis].Hacettepe University,Ankara. Aybek, B. & Aslan, S. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenleme düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından  incelenmesi. [An analysis of the self-regulation levels of prospective teachers in terms of certain variables.] Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 13(3): 455-470.

  3. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational  psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.

  4. Bayrakci, T. (2015). Çevrimiçi öğrenmede hazır bulunuşluk ve çevrimiçi öz-düzenleyici öğrenme becerileri ile  öğrencilerin tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [The examination of the relationship between online  learning readiness, online self-regulated learning skills and students' attitudes ] [Unpublished master thesis],  Mevlana University, Konya.

  5. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self‐regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and  intervention. Applied psychology, 54(2), 199-231.

  6. Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic  performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24-32.

  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2019). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. [Data analysis handbook for social sciences] (26th Edition). Pegem Akademi Publishing.

  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2021). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri  [Scientific Research Methods]. Pegem Akademi Publishing

  9. Ercan, B. (2015). Strese yatkınlık, bilişsel duygu düzenleme ve ebeveynlik biçiminin obsesif inançlar üzerine etkisi  The effects of vulnerability to stress, cognitive emotion regulation and parenting style on obsessional beliefs [Unpublished master's thesis]. Uludağ University, Bursa.

  10. Ercoşkun, N. Ç., & Gündoğdu, K. (2020). Investigation of Self-Regulation and Self-Efficacy Perceptions of  Prospective Mathematics Teachers. International Journal of Science and Education, 3(2), 101-118,  Fontana, R., Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A. & Margaryan, A. (2015). Measuring self-regulated learning in the  workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 32–52.

  11. Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and  emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1311-1327.

  12. Gömleksiz, M. N. & Demiralp, D. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenleyici öğrenme becerilerine ilişkin  görüşlerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından değerlendirilmesi. [An Assessment of Prospective Teachers’ Views  toward their Self-regulated Learning Skills in terms of Several Variables.] Gaziantep University Journal of  Social Sciences, 11(3), 777–795. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/223332

  13. Güler, M. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının öz düzenleme becerilerinin; duygusal zekâları, epistemolojik inançları ve  bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Investigating of teacher candidates' self regulated learning in terms  of emotional intelligence, epistemological beliefs and some variables. [Doctoral dissertation], Necmettin  Erbakan University, Konya.

  14. Haron, H., Mustafa, S. M. S., & Alias, R. A. (2010). Gender influences on emotional self-regulation among  Malaysian academicians. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(1), 20. Hong, E., Peng, Y., & Rowell, L. L. (2009). Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement-level  differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 269-276.

  15. Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y. & Lai, C. L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on  students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education, 160, 1-19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031

  16. İsrael, E. (2007). Özdüzenleme eğitimi, fen başarısı ve özyeterlilik [Self Regulation Instruction, Science  Achievement and Self Efficacy] [Doctoral dissertation], Dokuz Eylül University.

  17. Kulusaklı, E. (2022). Exploring self-regulated online learning skills of EFL learners in distance education. Turkish  Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 86-96.  https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/67387/1050356

  18. Liu, X., He, W., Zhao, L., & Hong, J. C. (2021). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning during the  COVID-19 lockdown. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.

  19. Martin, R. C., & Dahlen, E. R. (2005). Cognitive emotion regulation in the prediction of depression, anxiety,  stress, and anger. Personality and individual differences, 39(7), 1249-1260.

  20. Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(5), 242- 249.

  21. Onat, O., & Otrar, M. (2010). Bilişsel duygu düzenleme ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik  çalışmaları. [Adaptation of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire to Turkish: Validity and Reliability  Studies.] Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 31, 123-143.

  22. Ormrod, J. E. (2013). Öğrenme Psikolojisi [Human Learning] M. Baloğlu (Translation Ed.). İstanbul: Nobel. Özdemir, A., & Ahmet, Ö. N. A. L. (2021). An Investigation into Pre-Service Teachers’ Self-Regulated Online  Learning Perceptions. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(2), 143-159. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press.

  23. Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and  learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133-141.

  24. Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of  homework. Journal of advanced academics, 22(2), 194-218.

  25. Schutz, P. A. (1991). Goals in self-directed behavior. Educational psychologist, 26(1), 55-67. Schutz, P. A., & Davis, H. A. (2000). Emotions and self-regulation during test taking. Educational Psychologist,  35(4), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_03

  26. Shunk, H. D. (2011). Öğrenme teorileri [Learning Theories An Educational Persfective] Muzaffer Şahin (Translation Ed.) Ankara: Nobel

  27. Slavin, R. E. (2013). Eğitim psikolojisi: Kuram ve uygulama [Educational Psychology Theory and Practice] Galip  Yüksel, (Translation Ed.). Ankara: Nobel.

  28. Telli, S. G., & Altun, D. (2020). Coronavirüs ve çevrimiçi (online) eğitimin önlenemeyen yükselişi. [The  Coronavirus and the Rising of Online Education.] Journal of University Research, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page:  25-34. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.711110

  29. Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion Regulation: A Theme in Search of Definition. Monographs of the Society for  Research in Child Development, 59(2/3), 25-52.

  30. Thompson, R. A. (2006). The development of the person: Social understanding, relationships, conscience, self. In  Handbook of child psychology (s.24-99). New Jersey: Willay.

  31. Thompson, R. A., & Calkins, S. D. (1996). The double-edged sword: Emotional regulation for children at  risk. Development and psychopathology, 8(1), 163-182.

  32. Tuncalı, N. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarında bilişsel duygu düzenleme stratejileri ve akademik özyeterlik arasındaki  ilişkinin incelenmesi [Relationship Between Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Academic Self  Effiiacy on Teacher Candidates] [Unpublished master's thesis], Uludağ University, Bursa.

  33. Tülübaş, T. (2022). Çevrim İçi Öğrenmede Öz-düzenleme Becerisinin Akademik Başarıya Etkisi [The Effect of  Self-regulated Online Learning Skills on Academic Achievement] Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences  International, 12(2), 389-416.

  34. Tümen Akyıldız, S. (2020). Covid-19 sürecinde uygulanan çevrimiçi derslerde üniversite öğrencilerinin öz düzenlemeli öğrenme düzeyinin incelenmesi [Examining the self-regulated learning level of university  students in online courses applied during the Covid-19 process]. Eğitim Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimlerine  Multidisipliner Bakış [Multidisciplinary Perspective on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities], 135- 156.

  35. Varışlı, B. (2021). Pandemi Sürecinde Eğitimin Dönüşümü: Çevrimiçi Eğitimin Sosyolojik  Yansımaları. International Journal of Euroasian Research, 9(26), 237-249.

  36. Winne, P. H. (2017). Cognition and metacognition within self-regulated learning. In Handbook of self-regulation  of learning and performance (pp. 36-48). Routledge.

  37. Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting Self Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of  Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 356-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084

  38. Woolfolk, A. (2015). Educational Psychology, Sixth Canadian Edition. Pearson Education Canada. Yetik, S. S. (2011). Çevrimiçi öz düzenleyici öğrenme ortamında farklı denetim odaklarına göre sunulan  metabilişsel rehberliğin öğretmen adaylarının öz düzenleme becerilerine ve öz yeterlik algılarına etkisi [The  Effects Of Metacognitive Guidance Given in Accordance With Different Locus Of Control On Preservice  Teachers’ Self Regulation Skills And Self Efficacy Perceptions In Online Self Regulated Learning  Environment] [Doctoral Dissertation], Ankara University, Ankara

  39. Zhao, H., Chen, L. & Panda, S. (2014). Self-regulated learning ability of Chinese distance learners. British Journal  of Educational Technology, 45(5): 941-958

  40. Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Students differences in selfregulated learning: relating grade, sex  and gifdetness to self efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 51-59. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory  perspective. Educational psychologist, 33(2-3), 73-86.

  41. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic press.

  42. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. D. H. Schunk & B. J.  Zimmerman (Ed.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 267-296).  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

bottom of page