Impact of Intercultural Awareness on Innovation Capability in Multinational Organizations: Mediating Roles of Knowledge Sharing Motivations
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 28 October 2018

Impact of Intercultural Awareness on Innovation Capability in Multinational Organizations: Mediating Roles of Knowledge Sharing Motivations

Alisardar Mammadov, Ran An

South China University of Technology, China

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.01.04.40

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of intercultural awareness on knowledge sharing motivations and the mediation effects of knowledge sharing motivations between intercultural awareness and innovation capability. The results empirically proved that intercultural awareness has a significant positive influence on both trust and reciprocity-based knowledge sharing motivations. Results also showed that both trust-based and reciprocity-based knowledge sharing has a significant positive influence on innovation capability. The further analysis revealed that the relationship between intercultural awareness and innovation capability is mediated by the trust-based knowledge sharing motivation. However empirical evidence about the mediating role of reciprocity-based knowledge sharing between the intercultural awareness and innovation capability was not found. Overall, representing the first attempt, this paper contributes to the literature by discovering relationships among intercultural awareness, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability, as well as it may assist organizations to design more effective expatriate training programs.

References

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.

  • Al-Sa’di Ahmad Fathi , Ayman Bahjat Abdallah Samer Eid Dahiyat. (2017). The mediating role of product and process innovations on the relationship between knowledge management and operational performance in manufacturing companies in Jordan. Business Process Management Journal, 23 (2),349-376.

  • Andrews, K. M., Delahaye, B. D. (2000). Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 797 – 810.

  • Argote, L., McEvily, B., and Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571−582. 

  • Berger, C.R., and Calabrese, R.J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, (1), 99-112.

  • Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2012). What drives collective innovation? Exploring the system of drivers for motivations in open innovation Web-based platforms. Information Research., 17(10), paper 513. http://InformationR.net/ir/17-1/paper513.html

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological

  •            research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social

  •            Psychology, 51(6), 1173.

  • Bijlsma, K.& Koopman, P. (2003). Introduction: trust within organizations. Personnel Review, 32(5), 543-555.

  • Camelo Ordaz, C., Garcia Cruz, J., Sousa Ginel, E., Valle Cabrera, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: the mediating role of affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(07), 1442-1463.

  • Carr, S. (2010). Introduction: The Psychology of Global Mobility. The Psychology of Global Mobility, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 1-23.

  • Calik, Eyup. (2016). The effects of cooperation and support network on innovation capability and performance of SMES. Doctoral Thesis. Istanbul Technical University.

  • Chang, C. S. (2012). Performance guarantees in communication networks. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Chen, G. M., & Starosta, W. J. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. Communication Yearbook, 19, 353-383.

  • Chen, G. M. (2010). The impact of intercultural sensitivity on ethnocentrism and intercultural communication apprehension. Intercultural Communication Studies, 19(1), 1-9.

  • Cummings, J. (2003). Knowledge Sharing: A Review of the Literature. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

  • Chow, W.S. and Chan, L.S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.

  • Chua, A. (2004). Knowledge Management System Architecture: A Bridge between KM Consultants and Technologists. International Journal of Information Management, 24, 87-98.

  • Colakoglu, S., & Caligiuri, P. (2008). Cultural distance, expatriate staffing and subsidiary performance: The case of US subsidiaries of multinational corporations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(2), 223-239.

  • Davenport T. H., Prusak L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.

  • Dobrai, K., Farkas, F., Karoliny, Z., Poor, J. (2012). Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Companies–Evidence from Hungary. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 9(3), 149-161.

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 161–188.

  • Gong, Y. (2003). Subsidiary staffing in multinational enterprises: Agency, resources, and performances. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 728–739.

  • Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In R.Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 8-58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Hart, S.L. (1995). A Natural.Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340.

  • Hashim, K.F., Tan, F.B., and Andrade, A.D. (2012). The Role of Trust and Commitment in Continuous Knowledge Contribution Intention within Business Online Communities. CONF-IRM 2012, Proceeding, 9.http://aisel.aisnet.org/confirm2012/9

  • Heizmann, H., Fee, A., Gray, J.S. (2018). Intercultural Knowledge Sharing Between Expatriates and Host country Nationals in Vietnam: A Practice-based Study of Communicative Relations and Power Dynamics. Journal of International Management, 24, 16-32.

  • Hogan, S.J., Soutar, G.N., McColl-Kennedy, J.R. and Sweeney, J.C. (2011). Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability: Scale development. Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (8), 1264-1273.

  • Holste, J. S., Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128-140.

  • Hofstede, Pedersen, and Hofstede. (2002). Exploring Culture: Exercises, Stories, and Synthetic Cultures. Intercultural Press.

  • Hong, D., Suh, E., and Koo, C. (2011). Developing strategies for overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing based on conversational knowledge management: A case study of a financial company. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 14417– 14427.

  • Hung, S. Y., Durcikova, A., Lai, H. M., & Lin, W. M. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(6), 415–427.

  • Huemer, L. (1998). Trust in Business Relations:Economic Logic or Social Interaction? Borea Bokforlag, Umea.

  • Hsu, M. H., Ju, T.L., Yen, C. H. and Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 65(2), 153-169.

  • Hsu Yu-shan. (2012). Knowledge Transfer Between Expatriates and Host Country Nationals: A Social Capital Perspective. Doctoral Thesis. University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.

  • Hislop, D. (2003). Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment: a review and research agenda. Employee Relations, 25(2), 182–202.

  • Jiacheng, W., Lu, L., and Francesco, C. A. (2010). A cognitive model of intra- organizational knowledge-sharing motivations in the view of cross-culture. International Journal of Information Management, 30(3), 220–230.

  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. -K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113−143.

  • Kaps, Ines. (2011). Barriers in Intercultural Knowledge Sharing. Learning’s From an International Plant Engineering Project. Open Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 6-12.

  • Kim, K. Rachel. (2004). Intercultural Communication Competence: Initial application to instructor’s communication as a basis to assess multicultural teacher education programs. Master Thesis. University of Hawaii.

  • Lawson, B. and Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organizations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377-400.

  • Laforet, S. (2011). A framework of organisational innovation and outcomes in SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 17 (4), 380-408.

  • Lauring, Jakob. (2009).  Managing cultural diversity and the process of knowledge sharing: A case from Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 385—394.

  • Levy, M. (2011). Knowledge retention: minimizing organizational business loss. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (4), 582−600.

  • Lin, Hsiu-Fen. (2007). Effect of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33 (2), 135-14.

  • Lin, Chieh-Yu. (2006). Influences of Culture on Inter-Unit Knowledge Transfer Processes within Multinational Corporations. Journal of Global Business Management, 2, 24-31.

  • Liu, N., Liu, M-S. (2011). Human resource practices and individual knowledge-sharing behavior – an empirical study for Taiwanese R&D professionals. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,.22(4), 981-997.

  • Le, Phong Ba, Lei,Hui. (2018). The mediating role of trust in stimulating the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(3), 521-537.

  • Ma, W. W., Chan, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 51–58.

  • Madjar, N., Ortiz-Walters, R. (2009). Trust in supervisors and trust in customers: Their independent, relative, and joint effects on employee performance and creativity. Human Performance, 22, 128-142.

  • Minu Ipe. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organization: a conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2, 337.

  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

  • Pee, L. G. and Lee, J. (2015). Intrinsically Motivating Employees‘ Online Knowledge Sharing: Understanding the Effects of Job Design. International Journal of Information Management, 35(6), 679-690.

  • Presbitero, A., Attar, H. (2018). Intercultural communication effectiveness, cultural intelligence and knowledge sharing: Extending anxiety-uncertainty management theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 67, 35–43.

  • Podsiadlowski, A., &Ward, C. (2010). Global mobility and bias at the workplace. InS. Carr (Ed.), The handbook of global psychology (pp.279–300). New York: Springer Verlag

  • Ravu, S. Y., Parker, K. M. (2015). Expatriates and knowledge transfer: A case study of a power plant constructed in Africa. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 14(2), 327–342

  • Razmerita, L., Kirchner,K. and Nielsen, P. (2016). What Factors Influence Knowledge Sharing in Organizations?: A Social Dilemma Perspective of Social Media Communication. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20 (6), 1225-1246

  • Riege, A. (2005). Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management,.9(3),18-35.

  • Saunila, M., and Ukko, J. (2013). Facilitating innovation capability through performance measurement: A study of Finnish SMEs. Management Research Review, 36(10), 991-1010.

  • Sharqah, A., Al-Hhashem, A., Alqire, R. (2013). Social capital, attitude, expectations and quality of knowledge sharing in Jordanian knowledge stations. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 4(2), 185 – 199.

  • Sondergaard, S., Kerr, M., Clegg, C. (2007). Sharing Knowledge:Contextualising Socio-technical Thinking and Practice. The Learning Organization, 14(5), 423-435.


  • Storey, C., & Kelly, D. (2002). Innovation in services: The need for knowledge management. Australasian Marketing Journal, 10, 59–70.

  • Suppiah, Visvalingam and Sandhu, Manjit Singh. (2011). Organisational culture’s influence on tacit knowledge sharing behavior. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15, 462-477.

  • Shih, M. H., Tsai, H. T., Wu, C. C., Lu, C. H. (2006). A holistic knowledge sharing framework in high-tech firms: game and co-opetition perspectives. International Journal of Technology Management, 36(4), 354-367.

  • Tsui, A., Nifadkar, S. S., & Ou, A. Y. (2007). Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behaviorresearch: Advances, gaps and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33, 426-478.

  • Tufail, M.S., Hassan, M., Ismail, H., Zahra, S. (2016). The Impact of Work Social Support on Firm Innovation Capability: The Meditational Role of Knowledge Sharing Process and Job Satisfaction and Moderating Role of Organizational Trust. Pakistan Journal of Social Science, 36(2), 1215-1228.

  • Ullah M.J., Hamid K., Shahzad A., Mahmood Z. (2017). Enhancing the Innovation Capability through Knowledge Sharing. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 11 (1), 89-104.

  • Wallin, J., Larsson, A., Isaksson, O., Larsson, T. (2011). Measuring Innovation Capability–Assessing Collaborative Performance, in Product-Service System Innovation. Proceedings of the 3rd CIRP International Conference on Industrial Product Service Systems, 207–212.

  • Wang, W., & Hou, Y. (2015). Motivations of employees’ knowledge sharing behaviors: A self-determination perspective. Information & Organization, 25(1), 1–26.

  • Wang, Z., Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Application, 39 (10), 8899-9808.

  • Wasko, M. M., and Faraj, S. (2000). It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,9(2-3), 155-173.

  • Wang, Sheng & Noe, Raymond A. (2010).  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 115–131. 

  • Yesil,S., Buyukmeshe, T., Koska, A. (2013). Knowledge Sharing Process, Innovation Capability and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences ,75, 217 – 225.

  • Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229–239.

  • Zhao, H., Tong, X., Wong, P.K., Zhu,J. (2005). Types of technology sourcing and innovative capability: an exploratory study of Singapore manufacturing firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research 16(2), 209–224.

  • Zhang, Guijun. (2005). The cultural differences in Cross-Cultural Communication. Sino-US English Teaching, 12(2), 48-52.

  • Zhang, X., De Pablos, P. O., & Xu, Q. (2014). Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 491-498.

  • Zimmermann, Kristin. (2010). Intercultural Competence as a Success Factor of Virtual Multicultural Teams –A Case Study on the Team Effectiveness of Global HR Teams. Master Thesis. University of Jyväskylä.

bottom of page