Impacts of Capital Structure and Dividend Policy on the Financial Performance of Listed Companies on Vietnamese Stocks Market
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 11 June 2021

Impacts of Capital Structure and Dividend Policy on the Financial Performance of Listed Companies on Vietnamese Stocks Market

Loan T. Vu, Anh T. H. Vu, Thao T. P. Nguyen

Vietnam National University (Vietnam), Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Investment and Development of Vietnam (Vietnam), Thai Nguyen University of Economics and Business Administration (Vietnam)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.04.02.357

Pages: 209-217

Keywords: Leverage, Dividend Yield, ROA, ROE, P/E, Financial Performance

Abstract

This study is taken to describe the relationship between the levels of debt, dividend policy and the performance of firms listed in Vietnamese stock market. The dividend policy is proxied by the dividend yield while firm’s performance is measured by ROE, ROA, and P/E. The total number of observations is 552, collecting from 92 listed companies on Hochiminh Stock Exchange during 2012 and 2019. The analysis results from generalized least squares (GLS) models report that the choice of firm’s performance proxy affects the relationship between firm’s performance and leverage as well as dividend policy. While leverage has positive impact on ROE and ROA, it has negative impact on P/E. In contrast, dividend yield ratio is negatively correlated with ROA and P/E but positively correlated with ROE. However, the impact of debt levels on firm’s performance is independent with the choice of leverage proxy. The findings of this research are expected to provide better understanding about the connection between debt, dividend and performance of the firm that can support the managers to make relevant decisions.

References

  1. Abbas, Asad & Hashmi, Shujahat & Chishti, Anwar. (2016). Dividend Policy and Capital Structure: Testing Endogeneity, SSRN Electronic Journal, Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2745726. 10.2139/ssrn.2745726.

  2. Abdul, G.K. (2012). The Relationship of Capital Structure Decisions with Firm Performance: A Study of the Engineering Sector of Pakistan, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(1), 2162-3082.

  3. Abor, Joshua. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: An empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana, Journal of Risk Finance, 6. 438-445. 10.1108/15265940510633505.

  4. Alex S. L. Tse. (2020). Dividend policy and capital structure of a defaultable firm, Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, 30(3), 961-994.

  5. Ang, J. S., R. A. Cole, and Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Finance, 55, 81-106.

  6. Augusto, M.G., Lisboa, J.V. and Brandão, E.F. (2011). Dividend policy and capital structure: an empirical application in the Portuguese corporate context, Int. J. Decision Sciences, Risk and Management, Vol. 3, Nos. 1/2, pp.2–31.

  7. Baker, Malcolm, and Jeffrey Wurgler (2002). Market Timing and Capital Structure, Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1-32.

  8. Banerjee, Arindam & De, Anupam. (2015). Capital Structure Decisions and Its Impact on Dividend Payout Ratio during the Pre- and Post-period of Recession in Indian Scenario: An Empirical Study. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective , Journal of MDI , Gurgaon (Sage Publication), 19, 366-377, 10.1177/0972262915610956.

  9. Basil, Al‐Najjar, (2011) .The inter‐relationship between capital structure and dividend policy: empirical evidence from Jordanian data, International Review of Applied Economics, 25:2, 209-224, DOI: 10.1080/02692171.2010.483464

  10. Berger, Allen & Patti, Emilia. (2003). Capital Structure and Firm Performance: A New Approach to Testing Agency Theory and an Application to the Banking Industry, Journal of Banking & Finance, 30, 1065-1102. 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.05.015.

  11. Berger, A., Bonaccorsi di Patti, E. (2006). Capital structure and firm performance: a new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry, Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, 1065-102.

  12. Bokhtiar Hasan Md., Mainul Ahsan A. F. M., Afzalur Rahaman Md. & Nurul Alam Md. (2014). Influence of Capital Structure on Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh, International Journal of Business and Management, 9(5), 184194.

  13. Brigham, E. F. & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2004). Financial Management: Theory and Practice, 11th Edition, South-Western College Publishers, New York.

  14. Ebaid, Ibrahim. (2009). The Impact of Capital Structure Choice on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Egypt, Journal of Risk Finance, 10. 477-487. 10.1108/15265940911001385.

  15. Hess, Kurt & Gunasekarage, Abeyratna & Hovey, Martin. (2010). State-dominant and non-state-dominant ownership concentration and firm performance: Evidence from China, International Journal of Managerial Finance, 6, 264-289, 10.1108/17439131011074440.

  16. Fliers, Philip. (2016). Dividend Smoothing, Financial Flexibility and Capital Structure, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2821657.

  17. Fu-Min, Chang & Yale, Wang & Nicholas, R. Lee & Duong, T. La. (2014). Capital Structure Decisions and Firm Performance of Vietnamese Soes, Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(11), 1545-1563.

  18. Fosu, Samuel. (2013). Capital structure, product market competition and firm performance: Evidence from South Africa, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 53, 140–151. 10.1016/j.qref.2013.02.004.

  19. Gleason, Kimberly & Knowles, Lynette & Mathur, Ike. (2000). The Interrelationship Between Culture, Capital Structure, and Performance: Evidence from European Retailers, Journal of Business Research, 50. 185-191. 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00031-4.

  20. Ibrahim El‐Sayed Ebaid, (2009). The impact of capital‐structure choice on firm performance: empirical evidence from Egypt, The Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 10 Issue: 5, pp.477-487, https:// doi.org/10.1108/15265940911001385
    Permanent link to this document:
    https://doi.org/10.1108/15265940911001385

  21. Ince, U., & Owers, J. E. (2012). The interaction of corporate dividend policy and capital structure decisions under differential tax regimes, Journal of Economics and Finance, 36(1), 33-57, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-009-9101-7

  22. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), 305-360.

  23. Ju-Ann, Yang , Shyan-Rong, Chou , Hsien-Chao, Cheng & Chen-Hsun, Lee. (2010. The Effects of Capital Structure on Firm Performance in the Taiwan 50 and Taiwan Mid-Cap 100. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 13:5, 1069-1078, DOI: 10.1080/09720510.2010.10701521

  24. Khan, Mohd. (2012). Capital Structure, Equity Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from India, SSRN Electronic Journal, 10.2139/ssrn.2016420.

  25. Loc, Truong & Lanjouw, Gerrit & Lensink, Bernardus. (2004). The impact of privatisation on firm performance in a transition economy: the case of Vietnam, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management), Research Report.

  26. Majumdar, Sumit & Chhibber, Pradeep. (1999). Capital Structure and Performance: Evidence from a Transition Economy on an Aspect of Corporate Governance, Public Choice, 98. 287-305. 10.1023/A:1018355127454.

  27. Margaritis, Dimitris & Psillaki, Maria. (2007). Capital Structure and Firm Efficiency, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34, 1447-1469, 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02056.x.

  28. Margaritis, Dimitris & Psillaki, Maria. (2010). Capital Structure, Equity Ownership and Firm Performance, Journal of Banking & Finance, 34. 621-632. 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.08.023.

  29. María José Arcas & Patricia Bachiller, (2008). Performance and Capital Structure of Privatized Firms in Europe, Global Economic Review: Perspectives on East Asian Economies and Industries, 37:1, 107-123, DOI: 10.1080/12265080801911980

  30. Mcknight, Phillip & Weir, Charlie. (2009). Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49, 139-158. 10.1016/j.qref.2007.09.008.

  31. Miller, Merton & Modigliani, Franco. (1961). Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation Of Shares, The Journal of Business, 34. 411-411. 10.1086/294442.

  32. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment, The American Economic Review, 48, 261-297.

  33. Mujahid, Mubeen & Akhtar, Kalsoom. (2014). Impact of Capital Structure on Firms Financial Performance and Shareholders Wealth: Textile Sector of Pakistan, International Journal of Learning and Development, 4. 27. 10.5296/ijld.v4i2.5511.

  34. Nguyen, Thanh & Nguyen, Huu. (2020). Capital structure and firm performance of non-financial listed companies: Cross-sector empirical evidences from Vietnam, Accounting, 137-150. 10.5267/j.ac.2019.11.002.

  35. Nguyen,  Nhung & Nguyen,  Lien & Dang,  Hang. (2017). Analyze the Determinants of Capital Structure for Vietnamese Real Estate Listed Companies, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 270-282.

  36. Park, Kwangmin. (2013). Capital structure, free cash flow, diversification and firm performance: A holistic analysis, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 51–63. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.01.007.

  37. Pirzada, Kashan & Mustapha, Mohd & Wickramasinghe, Danture. (2015). Firm Performance, Institutional Ownership and Capital Structure: A Case of Malaysia, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 170-176, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.025.

  38. Salim, Mahfuzah & Yadav, Raj. (2012). Capital Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Listed Companies, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,65, 156–166, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.105.

  39. Vătavu, Sorana. (2015). The Impact of Capital Structure on Financial Performance in Romanian Listed Companies, Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1314-1322 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01508-7.

  40. Wang, Guo & Wang, Zi & Li, Yuan, (2014). The Impact of Free Cash Flow and Capital Structure on the Performance of the Company, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 623, 305-309,10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.623.305.

  41. Zeitun, Rami and Tian, Gary G. (2007). Capital structure and corporate performance: evidence from Jordan, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 1(4) , 40-61. doi:10.14453/aabfj.v1i4.3

bottom of page