top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Health and Medical Sciences

ISSN 2622-7258

Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.09 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.02 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.57 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.52 AM.png
open access

Published: 11 December 2019

Sonographic Determination of Common Breast Pathologies in Married Women

Sana Saleem, Rimshaw Qaiser, Aniqa Sadique, Rabia Yousaf, Sana Andaleb, Raham Bacha, Iqra Manzoor, Sajid Shaheen

University of Lahore, Pakistan

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 503-508

Keywords: Ultrasonography, Breast Lesions, Breast Pathologies, Palpable Masses, Malignant Lesions


Background: In women, breast masses are getting progressively increasing across the board because of their mortality. Women are at high hazard in view of breast sicknesses, all the more ordinarily in instances of breast malignant growth. In numerous places of the world, breast carcinoma characterizes top in dangerous tumors affecting ladies with breast malignancy rates going from 1 to 8. By 2020, 70% of the 15 million new yearly malignancy injured individuals will be in creating nations. In the evaluation of clinically prevailing breast masses, ultrasound is a relatively moderate and effectively accessible symptomatic methodology that can be utilized clinically. The point of this exploration is to discover the accuracy of ultrasound in the determination of prevailing breast masses. Objective(s): To determine common breast pathologies with ultrasound in married women. Methodology: Ultrasound was done by using GE LOGIQ V5 and GE V SCAN with transducer (7-13) MHz in Radiology Department of Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. From October 2018 to September 2019, 138 patients were collected through convenient sampling with the request of breast ultrasound. Statistical software (SPSS version 22.0) is used for the analysis of data. Results: This study was done by using Ultrasound with 7-13 MHz of transducer. Data of total 138 patients were recorded for this study. Ultrasound was performed and the findings were analyzed. Out of 138 patients, The Ultrasonographic findings and frequency came out to be: Calcific foci 1, Cystic lesion 2, Hypoechoic nodules 1, Abscesses 1, Calcific foci 2, Calcific foci with lymph node 1, Cyst with ductal ectasia 1, Cystic lesion 29, Cystic lesion & calcific foci 1, Cystic lesion with ductal ectasia 4, Cystic lesion with intramammary lymph node 1, Cystic lesion with left axillary lymph node 1, Cystic lesion with right axillary lymph node 2, Cystic lesion with right axillary lymph node 2, Ductal ectasia 10, Ductal ectasia cystic lesion with left axillary lymph node 1, Ductal ectasia hypo echoic nodules cystic lesion with left axillary lymph node 1, Ductal ectasia with left axillary lymph nodes 1, Ductal ectasia with right axillary lymph node 2, Echogenic nodule 5, Fibro adenoma 5, Fibro adenoma with intramammary lymph node 1, Hypo echoic nodules 11, Hypo echoic nodules with ductal ectasia 1, Hypo echoic nodules with right axillary lymph node 1, Left axillary lymph node 6, Lymph nodes 2, Macro calcifications 1, Macro calcifications with hypo echoic nodule 1, Right axillary lymph node 11, Right Intra-mammary lymph node 1, Solid lesion 27, Solid lesion with micro calcifications 1. Out of 138, only 3 women were breast feeders. According to this study, 57 patients had left-sided breast pathologies, and 81 had right-sided breast pathologies. Conclusion: Palpable breast masses could easily be characterized and localized with the help of a relatively inexpensive and a more accessible ultrasound modality. It should be the first-line investigation in women of all ages.


  1. BERRYHILL, G. E., GLOVICZKI, J. M., TROTT, J. F., AIMO, L., KRAFT, J., CARDIFF, R. D., PAUL, C. T., PETRIE, W. K., LOCK, A. L. & HOVEY, R. C. J. P. O. T. N. A. O. S. 2012. Diet-induced metabolic change induces estrogen-independent allometric mammary growth. 109, 16294-16299.
  2. CALEFFI, M., DUARTE FILHO, D., BORGHETTI, K., GRAUDENZ, M., LITTRUP, P., FREEMAN-GIBB, L., ZANNIS, V., SCHULTZ, M., KAUFMAN, C. & FRANCESCATTI, D. J. T. B. 2004. Cryoablation of benign breast tumors: evolution of technique and technology. 13, 397-407.
  3. CARTER, B. A., PAGE, D. L., SCHUYLER, P., PARL, F. F., SIMPSON, J. F., JENSEN, R. A. & DUPONT, W. D. J. C. 2001. No elevation in long‐term breast carcinoma risk for women with fibroadenomas that contain atypical hyperplasia. 92, 30-36.
  4. CHALYA, P. L., MANYAMA, M., RAMBAU, P. F., KAPESA, A., NGALLABA, S. E., MASALU, N. & MABULA, J. B. J. T. J. O. H. R. 2016. Clinicopathological pattern of benign breast diseases among female patients at a tertiary health institution in Tanzania. 18.
  5. DEVOLLI-DISHA, E., MANXHUKA-KËRLIU, S., YMERI, H. & KUTLLOVCI, A. J. B. J. O. B. M. S. 2009. Comparative accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms according to age and breast density. 9, 131.
  6. DYRSTAD, S. W., YAN, Y., FOWLER, A. M., COLDITZ, G. A. J. B. C. R. & TREATMENT 2015. Breast cancer risk associated with benign breast disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. 149, 569-575.
  7. EL-WAKEEL, H. & UMPLEBY, H. J. T. B. 2003. Systematic review of fibroadenoma as a risk factor for breast cancer. 12,302-307.
  8. HATIM, K. S., LAXMIKANT, N. S. & MULLA, T. J. I. J. O. R. I. M. S. 2017. Patterns and prevalence of benign breast disease in Western India. 5, 684-688.
  9. LARSEN, T., FAURSCHOU, J., BAK, M. & RYTTOV, N. J. U. F. L. 2003. Fibroadenoma of the breast--modern strategy of treatment. 165, 1979-1983.
  10. ONGORE, V. O., KUSA, G. B. J. I. J. O. E. & ISSUES, F. 2013. Determinants of financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. 3, 237-252.
  11. PARKIN, D. M., BRAY, F., FERLAY, J. & PISANI, P. J. C. A. C. J. F. C. 2005. Global cancer statistics, 2002. 55, 74-108.
  12. PRASAD, N. & HOUSERKOVA, D. 2007a. A comparison of mammography and ultrasonography in the evaluation of breast masses. Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of Palacky University in Olomouc, 151.
  13. PRASAD, N. & HOUSERKOVA, D. J. B. P. O. T. M. F. O. P. U. I. O. 2007b. A comparison of mammography and ultrasonography in the evaluation of breast masses. 151.
  14. RANGASWAMY, P. & RUBBY, S. A. J. I. S. J. 2016. Clinical study on fibroadenoma of the breast. 3, 1916-1919.
  15. RASHEED, A., SHARMA, S., MOHSIN–UL-RASOOL, B. S., HAFIZ, A. & BASHIR, N. 2014. A three year study of breast lesions in women aged 15-70 years in a tertiary care hospital. Sch J App Med Sci, 2, 166-168.
  16. SILVERA, S. A. N., ROHAN, T. E. J. B. C. R. & TREATMENT 2008. Benign proliferative epithelial disorders of the breast: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. 110, 397-409.
  17. VALEA, F. A. & KATZ, V. L. J. C. G. T. E. P., PA: MOSBY ELSEVIER 2007. Breast diseases: diagnosis and treatment of benign and malignant disease. 15.
  18. WELLINGS, S., JENSEN, H. & MARCUM, R. J. J. O. T. N. C. I. 1975. An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions. 55, 231-273.
  19. ZHOU, W.-B., XUE, D.-Q., LIU, X.-A., DING, Q., WANG, S. J. J. O. C. R. & ONCOLOGY, C. 2011. The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis. 137,1053-1060.
bottom of page