top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political


ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
open access

Published: 10 June 2022

Bibliometric Analysis: Symbolic Power Publication Trens in

Sulkhan Chakim

Universitas Islam Negeri Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 153-163

Keywords: Bibliometric, Publication, Research Development, Symbolic Power


The purpose of this study is to explore references to one source that can provide benefits for researchers about symbolic power, it is in the interest to use bibliometric methods to map the spification of research, namely 1) to reveal the number of articles produced by symbolic power research. 2) Conduct mapping to review symbolic power research that has been done, and 3) reveal the collaboration map. The method provides objective parameters in controlling literature and provides opportunities to encourage increased accuracy and minimize the bias of researchers in scientific literature reviews by paying attention to the research results of scholars working in the field research area. This bibliometric method provided citation analysis guidelines, co-citation analysis, coupling bibliography, co-author analysis, and co-word analysis, as well as work guidelines. Bibliometric methods would complement the meta-analysis and review of qualitatively structured literature as a method for exploring and evaluating scientific literature. To demonstrate bibliometric methods, it was done with citation analysis and co-citation to map the intellectual structure of symbolic power journals. The results showed that the investigation of human-related symbolic power was shown by 109 events widely published by the database during 2012-2022. From the mapping carried out through bibliometrics shows that the trend of research is related to the term human keywords.


  1. Abad-Segura, E., Cortés-García, F. J., & Belmonte-Ureña, L. J. (2019). The sustainable approach to corporate social responsibility: A global analysis and future trends. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(19).

  2. Bai, N., Li, H., Lv, J., Yang, S., & Xu, Y. (2022). Logic Design and Power Optimization of Floating-Point Multipliers. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022.

  3. Barash, R., & Antonovskiy, A. (2019). Rebellious man, be visible, or perish! visualization of the semantics of protest communication in social networks . Praxema, 4, 36–59.

  4. Bergström, P., Mårell-Olsson, E., & Jahnke, I. (2019). Variations of Symbolic Power and Control in the One-to-One Computing Classroom: Swedish Teachers’ Enacted Didactical Design Decisions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(1), 38–52.

  5. Biygautane, M., Clegg, S., & Al-Yahya, K. (2020). Institutional work and infrastructure public–private partnerships (PPPs): the roles of religious symbolic work and power in implementing PPP projects. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(5), 1077–1112.

  6. Borges, J. W. P., Pinheiro, N. M. G., & de Souza, A. C. C. (2012). Hypertension communicated and hypertension understood: Nursing know-how and practices in a Family Health Program in Fortaleza, State of Ceará . Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 17(1), 179–189.

  7. Bradley, T., Martin, Z., & Palriwala, R. (2021). Conceptualising Subjectivities and Rationalities in Understanding Gendered Violence: Processes of Social and Cultural Change. Progress in Development Studies, 21(2), 181–195.

  8. Caprara, A. (1998). Cultural interpretations of contagion. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 3(12), 996–1001.

  9. Chan, H. F., Guillot, M., Page, L., & Torgler, B. (2015). The inner quality of an article: Will time tell? Scientometrics, 104(1), 19–41.

  10. Chen, C., & Song, M. (2019). Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS ONE, 14(10).

  11. Cowley, S. J. (2019). Languaging evolved: A distributed perspective. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(4), 461–482.

  12. Demirel, P., Nemkova, E., & Taylor, R. (2021). Reproducing Global Inequalities in the Online Labour Market: Valuing Capital in the Design Field. Work, Employment and Society, 35(5), 914–930.

  13. Dubois, B. B., Lacasse, K., & Ley, A. J. (2021). What’s Water Got to Do with It? Place-Related Symbolic Meanings Alter Residents’ Perceived Effects of Coastal Infrastructure. Ecopsychology, 13(2), 123–132.

  14. Dunne, M., Fincham, K., Crossouard, B., & Durrani, N. (2020). Gender symbolism and the expression of post-colonial national and religious identities. Social Identities, 26(3), 376–387.

  15. Đurin, S. (2018). Queer activism and the transformation of the city: How the lgbtiq community is fighting for its space in the city of Zagreb . Narodna Umjetnost, 55(2), 75–103.

  16. Golonka-Czajkowska, M. (2019). Between ennoblement and exclusion: Heritage policies in Kraków. Etnografia Polska, 63(1–2), 137–154.

  17. Gordon, R., & Zainuddin, N. (2020). Symbolic violence and marketing ECRs in the neoliberal University. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(7–8), 705–726.

  18. Grieco, K. (2016). Mining development “gender”: Maternalism and extractivism, between complementarity and contestation . In Cahiers des Ameriques Latines (Vols. 2016-Janua, Issue 82, pp. 95–111).

  19. Hjellbrekke, J., & Korsnes, O. (2017). A place at what table? An analysis of symbolic capital hierarchies at the Norwegian Central Bank’s annual dinner . Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning, 58(1), 5–35.

  20. Imperatori, L. S., Cataldi, J., Betta, M., Ricciardi, E., Ince, R. A. A., Siclari, F., & Bernardi, G. (2021). Cross-participant prediction of vigilance stages through the combined use of wPLI and wSMI EEG functional connectivity metrics. Sleep, 44(5).

  21. Johnson, M. (2017). Gendering pastoral power: masculinity, affective labour and competitive bonds of solidarity among Filipino migrant men in Saudi Arabia. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(6), 823–833.

  22. Kauppi, N. (2018). The global ranking game: narrowing academic excellence through numerical objectification. Studies in Higher Education, 43(10), 1750–1762.

  23. King, H., Crossley, S., & Smith, R. (2021). Responsibility, resilience and symbolic power. Sociological Review, 69(5), 920–936.

  24. Kokosalakis, N. (2020). Symbolism and Power in David Martin’s Sociology of Religion. Society, 57(2), 173–179.

  25. Ku, A. S. (2004). Negotiating the space of civil autonomy in Hong Kong: Power, discourses and dramaturgical representations. China Quarterly, 179, 647–664.

  26. Locock, L., Boylan, A.-M., Snow, R., & Staniszewska, S. (2017). The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research. Health Expectations, 20(5), 836–844.

  27. Lombardi, D., & Moschella, M. (2017). The symbolic politics of delegation: macroprudential policy and independent regulatory authorities. New Political Economy, 22(1), 92–108.

  28. Ma, L., & Schwede, K. (2018). Perfectoid multiplier/test ideals in regular rings and bounds on symbolic powers. Inventiones Mathematicae, 214(2), 913–955.

  29. Macfarlane, B., & Jefferson, A. E. (2022). The closed academy? Guild power and academic social class. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(1), 36–47.

  30. Machado, C. G., Winroth, M. P., & Ribeiro da Silva, E. H. D. (2020). Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: an emerging research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1462–1484.

  31. Mayes, S. (2016). The symbolic generic initial system of almost linear point configurations in ℙ 2. Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, 46(1), 283–299.

  32. Mendes, P. E. (2021). Marcelo Caetano and his circumstance towards leadership: symbolic power, ambition and adaptation . Opiniao Publica, 27(3), 1024–1057.

  33. Mere, K., & Ngarawula, B. (2015). Symbolic meanings of keo traditional house in flores, Indonesia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4S3), 500–505.

  34. Mikkelsen, B. E., Sudzina, F., Botek, M., Romani, A. Q., & Larsen, K. (2021). Are perceptions of health dependant on social class? Studying soft power and symbolic violence in a health promotion program among young men at vocational schools. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14).

  35. Molla, T. (2019). Educational aid, symbolic power and policy reform: The world bank in ethiopia. London Review of Education, 17(3), 331–346.

  36. Moran, A. (2021). Encountering the goddess in the indian himalaya: On the contribution of ethnographic film to the study of religion. Religions, 12(11).

  37. Morello SJ, G. (2019). The Symbolic Efficacy of Pope Francis’s Religious Capital and the Agency of the Poor. Sociology, 53(6), 1077–1093.

  38. Ning, A., & Petch, D. (2016). Integrated design of downwind land-based wind turbines using analytic gradients. Wind Energy, 19(12), 2137–2152.

  39. Noonan-Gunning, S. (2019). Social Implications of Weight Bias Internalisation: Parents’ Ultimate Responsibility as Consent, Social Division and Resistance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.

  40. Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K., Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J., & Rabello, E. T. (2020). Visual cross-platform analysis: digital methods to research social media images. Information Communication and Society, 23(2), 161–180.

  41. Pérez-Valero, J., Garcia-Sanchez, A.-J., Marín, M. R., & Garcia-Haro, J. (2020). A prototype framework design for assisting the detection of atrial fibrillation using a generic low-cost biomedical sensor. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(3).

  42. Pöllmann, A. (2013). Intercultural capital: Toward the conceptualization, operationalization, and empirical investigation of a rising marker of sociocultural distinction. SAGE Open, 3(2), 1–7.

  43. Ranji, B. (2021). Shaping news waves and constructing events: Iranian journalists’ use of online platforms as sources of journalistic capital. New Media and Society, 23(7), 1936–1952.

  44. Sandberg, L., & Coe, A.-B. (2020). Taking back the Swedish night: making and reclaiming space. Gender, Place and Culture, 27(7), 1044–1062.

  45. Schlieter, J. (2017). Religious symbols in public spaces: Symbolic effect as collective intentionality of an interpretive community . Zeitschrift Fur Religionswissenschaft, 25(2), 196–232.

  46. Sikevich, Z. V, & Skvortsov, N. G. (2020). Correlation of national and ethnic identity of the youth (On the example of Saint Petersburg). RUDN Journal of Sociology, 20(2), 277–291.

  47. Stringfellow, L., McMeeking, K., & Maclean, M. (2015). From four to zero? The social mechanisms of symbolic domination in the UK accounting field. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 86–100.

  48. Sullivan, J., Chadwick, S., & Gow, M. (2019). China’s Football Dream: Sport, Citizenship, Symbolic Power, and Civic Spaces. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 43(6), 493–514.

  49. Tayebi, S. M., Manesh, S. R., Khalili, M., & Sadi-Nezhad, S. (2019). The role of information systems in communication through social media. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3(3), 245–268.

  50. Törrönen, J., Samuelsson, E., Roumeliotis, F., Room, R., & Kraus, L. (2021). ‘Social health’, ‘physical health’, and well-being: Analysing with bourdieusian concepts the interplay between the practices of heavy drinking and exercise among young people. International Journal of Drug Policy, 91.

  51. Trisyani, Y., & Windsor, C. (2019). Expanding knowledge and roles for authority and practice boundaries of Emergency Department nurses: a grounded theory study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 14(1).

  52. Veenstra, G. (2018). Infusing fundamental cause theory with features of Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic power. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 46(1), 49–52.

  53. Wacquant, L. (2017). Bourdieu comes to the city: Pertinence, principles, applications . Eure, 43(129), 279–304.

  54. Wacquant, L. (2018). Four transversal principles for putting Bourdieu to work. Anthropological Theory, 18(1), 3–17.

  55. Williams, K. (2020). Playing the fields: Theorizing research impact and its assessment. Research Evaluation, 29(2), 191–202.

  56. Woodfill, B. K. S. (2021). Contextualizing caves within an animate maya landscape: Caves as living agents in the past and present. Religions, 12(12).

  57. Xu, X. (2019). Is “Beautiful Female Something” Symbolic Capital or Symbolic Violence? That Is a Question. SAGE Open, 9(2).

bottom of page