Lead Researchers’ Voices on the Nature and Motive of Academic Research at Makerere University
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 01 November 2018

Lead Researchers’ Voices on the Nature and Motive of Academic Research at Makerere University

Muhamadi Kaweesi, Dr. Ronald Bisaso, Associate Professor Betty Akullu Ezati

Makerere University, Uganda

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.01.04.35

​

​

Abstract

The production of knowledge that is diverse in nature has gained importance in research-led universities. However, the nature of scientific knowledge and researchers' motives of producing such knowledge across disciplinary fields in research-led Sub-Saharan African universities are not clearly known. This study set out to access the voices of lead researchers regarding the nature and motive of academic research in Uganda's research-led flagship academic institution-Makerere University. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with twelve lead researchers that were purposively selected. This was triangulated with documents checks. The thematic analysis method was used to analyse data. The paper draws on Hakala and Ylijoki's knowledge production framework as an analytical lens. Overall, findings show that in spite of the production of knowledge that has application to policymakers, civil society, the ordinary people, and, the corporate sector, academic research is more understood in terms of the basic research orientation across disciplinary fields because the emphasis is more on publishing in top-ranked journals. Similarly, knowledge production takes place in a highly institutionalized and resource-constrained environment, and this has popularised the donor-driven research orientation. Because of the dominance of basic and donor-driven research, we recommend that there is a need to rethink the University promotional assessment model, diversify research funding sources, and selectively collaborate with the donors.

References

  1. Albert, M. (2003). University and the market economy: The Differential Impact on knowledge production in Sociology and Economics. Higher Education, 45(2), 147-187. Retrieved from: http://www.Jstor.org/stable/3447527.

  2. Altbach, P. G. (2013). Advancing the national and global knowledge economy: The role of research universities in developing countries. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3) 316-330. doi:    10.1080/03075079.2013.773222

  3. Aluni, J., & Liam, C. (2014). Furthering the research impact of UCD: Report of the beyond publications committee. University College Dublin. http://hdl.handle.net/10197/729

  4. Barwick, M., Phipps, D., Myers, G., Johnny, M., & Coriandoli, R. (2014). Knowledge Translation and Strategic Communication: Unpacking differences and similarities for scholarly and research communication. Scholarly and Research Communication, 5(3), 14.

  5. Becher, T. (1989).Academic Tribes and Territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

  6. Bisaso, R. (2011). Utilising the Learning Organization for Management Capacity Building at Makerere University. A Ph.D. dissertation presented at University of Tampere, November 18th, 2011.

  7. Blom, A., Lan, G., & Adil, M. (2016). Sub-Saharan Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics research. A decade of development. A World Bank Study.

  8. Boggio, A., Ballabeni, A., & Hemenway, D. (2016). Basic Research and Knowledge Production Modes: A View from the Harvard Medical School. Science, Technology, & Human Values 2016, Vol. 41(2) 163-193. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915592244.

  9. Bornmann, L. (2012). Measuring the societal impact of research. EMBO Reports, 13(8), 673–676.

  10. Boshoff, N., & Esterhuyse, H. (2016). Productive interactions for societal impact: developing a research information system for agriculture (RIS-Agric) at Stellenbosh University, South Africa. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Valencia (Spain), September 14-16, 2016. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/STI2016.2016.xxxx

  11. Bunting, I., Cloete, N., & Van Schalkwyk, F. (2014).An Empirical Overview of Eight Flagship Universities in Africa: 2001–2011. A Report of the Higher Education Research and Advocacy Network in Africa (HERANA). Cape Town: Centre for Higher Education Transformation.

  12. Calvert, J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). Changing Conceptions of Basic Research? SPRU – Science and Technology Policy Research. University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RF, UK

  13. Casswill, C., and Shove, E. (2000) ‘‘Introducing Interactive Social Science’’, Science and Public

  14. Policy 27(3): 154–7.

  15. Castells, M. (2004). The Power of Identity. The Information Age: Economy, Society and

  16. Culture. 2nd Edition. Wiley-Blackwell.

  17. Cherney, A., Head, B., Povey, J., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2015). The utilization of social science research: The perspectives of academic researchers in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 252-2710. doi: 10.1177/1440783313505008

  18. Cherney, A., Head, B., Povey, J., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2013). Research utilization in the social sciences: A comparison of five academic disciplines in Australia. Science Communication, 35(6), 780-809. doi: 10. 1177/1075547013491398

  19. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited in: R. Bisaso (2011). Utilising the Learning Organization for Management Capacity Building at Makerere University. A PhD dissertation presented at University of Tampere, November 18th, 2011.

  20. Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining Change in Universities: Continuities in Case Studies and Concepts, maidenhead, society for research into Higher Education and Open University Press. Berkshire, England.

  21. Cloete, N., Bailey, T., Pillay, P., Bunting. I., & Maassen. P. (2011).Universities and Economic Development in Africa. Key findings. Cape Town: CHET. Retrieved from: http://www.chet.org.za/books/Universities-and-economic-development-africa

  22. Cloete, N., Bunting, I., & Maassen, P. (2015). Research universities in Africa: An empirical overview of eight flagship universities. In N. Cloete., P. Maassen., & T. Bailey (Eds.), Knowledge production and contradictory functions in African higher education (pp.18- 31). African Minds Higher Education Dynamics Series 1.

  23. Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2007). Intensification of university-industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54, 61-84.

  24. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundation of social research: Meaning and perspectives in the research process. London: Sage.

  25. Dean, L., Njelesani, J., Smith, H., & Bates, I. (2015). Promoting sustainable research partnerships: A mixed-method evaluation of a United Kingdom–Africa capacity-strengthening award scheme. Health Research Policy and Systems 13: 81

  26. Denzin, N. K & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). “Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research.” In N. K Denzin & Y. S Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, PP. 1-17. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  27. ERiC (Evaluating Research in Context). (2010). Evaluating the societal relevance of academic research: A guide. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.

  28. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to the Special Issue on Science Policy Dimensions of the Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Science and public policy, 24(1), 2-5.

  29. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies (conference Report), Science and Public Policy Vol. 25(3) (1998) 195-203

  30. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). 'The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of University-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.

  31. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). “Research groups as “quasi-firms”: the Invention of the Entrepreneurial University. Research Policy, Vol. 32, PP. 109-121.

  32. Ezrahi Y. (1990). The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

  33. Feldman, M. P., & Desrochers, P. (2004). Truth for its own sake: Academic culture and Technology transfer at Johns Hopkins University. Minerva 42: 105-126, 2004. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41821274.

  34. Freeman, P., Johansson, E., Thorvaldsson, J. (2010). Sida review: Enhancing Research Capacity at Makerere University, Uganda through collaboration with Swedish Universities, 2000–2008. Past Experiences and Future Direction

  35. Gagnon, M. (2016). Knowledge dissemination and exchange of knowledge. J Orhop Sports Phys Ther, 46(7), 500-501. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.0110

  36. Gaillard, J. F. (1994). North-South partnership: Is collaboration possible between unequal partners? Knowledge and Policy, 7(2), 31-63.         

  37. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

  38. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.

  39. Gornitzka, A., & Sverdrup, U. (2010). Enlightened Decision Making? The Role of Scientists in

  40. EU Governance, Politique européenne 2010/3 (No 32), p. 125-149. DOI 10.3917/poeu.032.0125

  41. Gray, D. E. (2004). Doing research in the real world. London: Sage Publications.

  42. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, S. Y (2005). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions and Emerging Confluences. . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  43. Haas, P. (1992) ‘‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’’, International Organization 46(1): 1–35.

  44. Hakala, J., & Ylijoki, O. H. (2001). Research for Whom? Research Orientations in Three Academic Cultures. University of Tampere, Finland. Organization, 8(2), 373–380. doi: 1350-5084(200105)8:2;373–380;017781

  45. HEFCE (2011). Decisions on         assessing research impact.        http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/decisionsonassessingresearchimpact/01_11.p  df

  46. Hill, K. Q., Capers, J. K., & Flink, C. (2014). “Why Some and Not Others?” The Determinants of the Quality and Prestige of Public Graduate Research Universities. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2014, Vol. 14(1) 29-49.

  47. Horowitz, I. L. (ed.) (1971). The Use and Abuse of Social Science. Trans-action Books, Volume 2 of Transaction studies in social policy.

  48. Ijeoma, J., Ibegbulam, A., & Eze U. J. (2016). Factors that Contribute to Research and Publication Output among Librarians in Nigerian University Libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 42 (2016) 15–20.

  49. Jacob, M. (2006). Utilization of Social Science Knowledge in Science Policy: Systems of Innovation, Triple Helix and VINNOVA. Social Science Information Vol 45, Issue 3, pp. 431 - 462

  50. Jacob, M. (2009). On Commodification and the Governance of Academic Research. Minerva: A Review of Science Learning and Policy, 47(4), 391-405.

  51. Jansen, D. (1995). Convergence of Basic and Applied Research? Research Orientations in German High-Temperature Superconductor Research. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 20(2), 197-233.

  52. Jasanoff S. (1998). The Fifth Branch - Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

  53. Kasozi, A. B. K. (2016). The impact of the Uganda state management style on higher education governance, research, and post graduate training 2001-2012. Paper presented at a Colloquium on higher education, Monday, 11 April 2016, Makerere Institute of Social Research (MISR).

  54. Katy, S., Nigel, D., Fiona, R., & Ruth, H. (2016). Using Twitter to drive research impact: A discussion of strategies, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 59, 15-26. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.02.004.

  55. Lam, A. (2010). From 'Ivory Tower Traditionalists' to 'Entrepreneurial Scientists'? Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University-Industry Boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307-340.

  56. Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2008). In the know: Exploring the effect of geographical proximity on industry-University collaboration in the UK. Copenhagen Business School.

  57. Lechuga, V. M., & Lechuga, D. C. (2012). Faculty motivation and scholarly work: Self-determination and self-regulation perspectives. Journal of the Professoriate, 6 (2).

  58. Lemos, M. C., & Morehouse, B. J. (2005). The co-production of science and policyin integrated climate assessments. Global Environmental Change 15(2005) 57-68.

  59. Makerere University (2008a). Makerere University Strategic Plan 2008/09-2018/19. Makerere University, Kampala: Makerere University.

  60. Makerere University (2008b). Makerere University Research and Innovations Policy. As approved by the University Council at its 112th meeting held on Thursday March 13th  2008.   Makerere University, Kampala: Makerere University.

  61. Makerere University (2008c). Makerere University Intellectual Property Management Policy. As approved by the University Council at its 112th meeting held on Thursday March 13th  2008.   Makerere University, Kampala: Makerere University.

  62. Makerere University (2013b). Makerere University Annual Report. The Planning and Development Department, Makerere University, Kampala: Makerere University.

  63. Massy, W. F. (2009).Academic values in the marketplace. Higher Education Management and policy. 2(3), 1-16.

  64. Mouton, J. (2010). The state of social science in Sub-Saharan Africa: World Social Science report. Knowledge divides Background paper, ISSC.

  65. Mshoro, I., Galabawa, J., Baregu, M., Chijoriga, M., Kombe, W., & Toba, R. D. l. (2007). Overview of the UDSM five year rolling strategic plan 2007/2008 to 2011/2012. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam: University of Dar es Salaam.

  66. Mugabi, H. (2014). Institutionalisation of the third mission of the university: The case of Makerere University. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Tampere, School of Management. Finland: Tampere University Press.

  67. Mugimu, C. B., Nakabugo, M. G., Katunguka-Rwakishaya, E. (2013). Developing Capacity for Research in Higher Education. A case of Makerere University. World Journal of Education. Vol 3, No 6 (2013)

  68. Musiige, G. (2014). Research at Makerere University: Faculty perceptions towards the factors that influence research productivity. A master’s dissertation submitted to the University of Oslo.

  69. Nakabugo, M. G., Barrett, E., McEvoy, O., & Munk, R. (2010). Best practices in North– South research partnerships in higher education: The Irish African partnership model. Policy and Practice: A Development Education Review 10: 89–89.

  70. Nakayiwa, F. (2015). Transforming Makerere into a Research-led University. University World News. Karen MacGregor10 January 2015 Issue No: 349.

  71. Nisbet, M. C., & Huge, M. (2006). Attention Cycles and Frames in the Biotechnology Debate. Managing Power and Participation through the Press/Policy Connection. Press/Politics 11 (2): 3-40 DOI: 10.1177/181180X06286701

  72. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

  73. Nurius, P. S., & Kemp, S. P. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and translation: Preparing social work doctoral students for high impact research. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(5), 625-635. doi: 10.1177/1049731513512375

  74. O’shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy. 34 (2005), 994–1009. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011.

  75. Orem, N. J., Mafigiri, D. K., Marchal, B., Ssengooba, F., Macqi, J., & Criel, B. (2012). Research evidence and policy making: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda. BMC Public Health, 12:109. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-245/12/109.

  76. Pamfie, R., Guisca, S., & Bumba, R. (2014).Academic research:  a catalyst for innovation process within companies in Romania. Bucharest University of economic Studies, Romania.

  77. Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research Training and Supervision Development. Studies in    Higher Education, 27(2).

  78. Rallison, S. P. (2015). What are journals for? Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 97(2), pp.89-91, http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588414X14055925061397

  79. Reddy, P. (2011). The evolving role of University in Economic Development: The Case of University-Industry Linkages in: Insight & Innovation in International Development. Universities in Transition. The Changing Role & Challenges for academic Institutions. Springer International Development Research Centre. Ottawa Canada.

  80. Sandberg, B., & Faugert, S. (2012). Perspective on evaluation. Studentlitteratur. Lund, Sweden.

  81. Sawyer, A. (2004). African Universities and the challenge of research capacity development. Journal of Higher Education in Africa, 2(1), 213–42.

  82. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  83. Smith-Doerr, L., & Vardi, I. (2015). ‘‘Mind the Gap Formal Ethics Policies and Chemical Scientists’ Everyday Practices in Academia and Industry.’’ Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (2): 176-98

  84. Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T. A., Penner, B. C. (2008). Problem-solving Skills in Social Science. University of Pittsburg Pennsylvania

  85. Weiss, C. (1979). ‘‘The Many Meanings of Research Utilization’’, Public Administration

  86. Review 39: 426–31.

  87. Weiss, S. J., Kinney, M., & Hurst, J. B. (2015). Creative problem Solving for Social studies, The Social Studies, 71: 6, 244-249 DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1944.11019672

  88. Wernil, D., & Darbellay, F. (2016). Interdisciplinarity and the 21st Century Research-intensive University: Pushing the Frontiers of Innovative Research. League of European Research Universities (LERU). https://www.leru.org

  89. Ylijoki, O-H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of University research. Higher Education, 45(3), 307-335. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1022667923715.

  90. Ylijoki, O-H., Lyytinen, A., & Marttila, L. (2011). Different research markets: a disciplinary perspective. Higher Education, 62(6), 721-740. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9414-2.

  91. Ziman, J. (1996). Post-academic science: Constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies, 9, 67-80.

bottom of page