Situational Criminogenic: The Financial Crime’s Collaborative Factors in Indonesia
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 05 April 2021

Situational Criminogenic: The Financial Crime’s Collaborative Factors in Indonesia

Supriyanto, Adrianus Meliala

University of Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.04.02.270

Pages: 1-9

Keywords: Situational Criminogenic, Financial Crime, Criminaloid, Organizational Criminogenic

Abstract

Financial crimes in Indonesia from 2014-2018 were classified as quite dynamic with a total of 241,367 cases. In 2018 the legal unit area of Polda Metro Jaya had the highest number of cases of 5,526 cases of financial crimes. This study seeks to examine the determinant aspects of financial crime in Indonesia. I used the illustration of the case of First Travel and the Koperasi Simpan Pinjam (KSP) Pandawa that occurred in Indonesia with a total loss of up to IDR 1 trillion. Discussions in this paper begin from the point of view of white collar crime that elaborated with criminaloid and organizational criminogenic aspects. This study uses a grounded theory method through in-depth interviews of actors. The result is that on the criminaloid aspect, the perpetrators have a tendency to easily confess, have certain social and cultural status, has moral sensitivity and intelligence, and has skills, but hesitates in acting. Meanwhile, in the organizational criminogenic aspect, it was found that the perpetrators were in an environment with profit-oriented ambitions, had certain business perceptions, had a loyal attitude towards their group and their human resources tended to be homogeneous. The results of this study found that a supportive situation is needed in financial crime based on the illustrations of the cases used. Situational criminogenic aspects in research in the form of business that utilize religious sentiments, use a cooperative system and manage funds with a Ponzi scheme. This research will enrich criminology studies, especially in the field of white collar crime. Other than that, hopefully can be useful in the formulation of policies for stakeholders.

References

  1. Abel, CF (2008). Corporate Crime and Restitution. Journal of Offender Counseling Services Rehabilitation, 9 (3), 71-94. doi: 10.1300 / J264v09n03_07

  2. Bradshaw, E. (2015). “Obviously, we're all oil industry”: The criminogenic structure of the offshore oil industry. Theoretical Criminology. 19. 376-395. 10.1177 / 1362480614553521.

  3. Brodie, N. & Proulx, B. (2013). Museum malpractice as corporate crime? The case of the

  4. J. Paul Getty Museum. Journal of Crime and Justice. 37. 399-421. 10.1080 / 0735648X.2013.819785.

  5. Bruinsma, G., & Weisburd, D. (2014). Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.

  6. Cavender, G., & Miller, KW (2013). Corporate Crime as Trouble: Reporting on the Corporate Scandals of 2002.Devant Behavior, 34 (11), 916-931. doi: 10.1080 / 01639625.2013.793578

  7. Center, NCF (2011). Types and Schemes of White Collar Crime. Retrieved from http://www.ckfraud.org/whitecollar.html.

  8. Corcoran, K. & Pettinicchio, D. & Robbins, B. (2012). Religion and the Acceptability of White-Collar Crime: A Cross-National Analysis. Journal for The Scientific Study of Religion - J SCI STUD RELIG. 51.10.2307 / 41681810.

  9. Craig, JM, & Piquero, NL (2016). The Effects of Low Self-Control and Desire-for-Control on White-Collar Offending: A Replication. Deviant Behavior, 37 (11), 1308-1324. doi: 10.1080 / 01639625.2016.1174520

  10. Creswell. (2008). Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson

  11. Finley, L. (2013). Examining state and state-corporate crime surrounding major sporting events. Contemporary Justice Review. 16. 10.1080 / 10282580.2013.798518.

  12. Glebovskiy, A. (2019). Inherent criminogenesis in business organizations. Journal of Financial Crime, 26 (2), 432-446. doi: 10.1108 / jfc-01-2018-0010

  13. Gottschalk, P. (2016). Convenience in White-Collar Crime: Introducing a Core Concept. Deviant Behavior, 38 (5), 605-619. doi: 10.1080 / 01639625.2016.1197585

  14. Gottschalk, P. (2019). Theory of Convenience: Determinants of White-Collar Crime Intention. Deviant Behavior, 1-9. doi: 10.1080 / 01639625.2019.1624101

  15. Griffin, O Hayden & Spillane, F Joseph. 2016. Confounding the process: forgotten actors and factors in the state-corporate crime paradigm. Crime Law Soc Change (2016) 66: 421–437.

  16. Jordanoska, A. (2018). The Social Ecology of White-Collar Crime: Applying Situational Action Theory to White-Collar Offending. Deviant Behavior, 39 (11), 1427-1449. doi: 10.1080 / 01639625.2018.1479919

  17. Lord, N. & Campbell, L. & Van Wingerde, K. (2018). Other People's Dirty Money: Professional Intermediaries, Market Dynamics and the Finances of White-Collar, Corporate and Organized Crimes. British Journal of Criminology.

  18. Pearce, F. (2016). Corporate Rationality as Corporate Crime. Studies in Political Economy, 40 (1), 135-162. doi: 10.1080 / 19187033.1993.11675413

  19. Mind of the People. (2019). Reading Corruption Trends in 2019, Will the OTT Record Break? Retrieved from https://www.pikiran-rakyat.com/nasional/pr- 01305011 / reading-trends-corruption-years-2019.

  20. Piquero, N. & Exum, M. & Simpson, S. (2005). Integrating the desire-for-control and rational choice in a corporate crime context. Justice Quarterly - JUSTICE Q. 22. 252-280. 10.1080 / 07418820500089034.

  21. Piquero, NLC, Stephanie; Piquero, Alex R. (2007). Research Note: Assessing the Perceived Seriousness of White-Collar and Street Crimes.

  22. Ragatz, Laurie & Fremouw, William. (2010) A Critical Examination of Research on the Psychological Profiles of White-Collar Criminals, Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice,

  23. Schoepfer, A., Piquero, NL, & Langton, L. (2013). Low Self-Control Versus the Desire- For-Control: An Empirical Test of White-Collar Crime and Conventional Crime. Deviant Behavior, 35 (3), 197-214. doi: 10.1080 / 01639625.2013.834758

  24. Shapiro, S. (1990). American Sociological Review, 55 (null), 346.

  25. Siegel, LJ (2012). Criminology (Eleventh ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

  26. Sutherland, EH (1940). White-Collar Criminality. American Sociological Review, 5 (1), 1-12. doi: https: //psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/2083937

  27. van Erp, J. (2018). The Organization of Corporate Crime: Introduction to Special Issue of Administrative Sciences. Administrative Sciences, 8 (3). doi: 10.3390 / admsci8030036

  28. Wang, X., & Holtfreter, K. (2011). The Effects of Corporation- and Industry-Level Strain and Opportunity on Corporate Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49 (2), 151-185. doi: 10.1177 / 0022427810395321

bottom of page