The COVID-19 Infodemic: Women and Digital (Health) Literacy
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 24 November 2022

The COVID-19 Infodemic: Women and Digital (Health) Literacy

Ni Made Ras Amanda Gelgel, Ikma Citra Ranteallo

Udayana University, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.05.04.379

Pages: 70-78

Keywords: COVID-19, Digital Literacy, Health Promotion, Infodemics, Women

Abstract

The COVID-19 infodemics and gender make it challenging to promote science and health via social media. The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of infodemic exposure on women and men. We argue that an inclusive society is equipped with reliable digital literacy that enables women and men to participate in preventing COVID-19. This quantitative research carried out a survey in June–September 2020, with 440 social media users as respondents in Bali, Indonesia. The approach aims to evaluate attitudes regarding the COVID-19 infodemics. We calculated an error margin of less than +/- 5% at a level of confidence of 95% by combining the online questionnaires and survey analyses. According to the official website of Indonesia's Ministry of Communications and Information, users are grouped based on their age. For sample distribution, trends, and cross-tabulation, a Statistical Package for the Social Sciences was also used. We discovered that women are more inclined than men to accept the material in the COVID-19 infomercials as accurate. Men were more likely to practice the advice given in the infodemics than women, despite the fact that women believed the infodemics to be factual. However, more women than men reported being likely to spread the erroneous information, which indicates that women are more likely than men to do so. When given incorrect information about COVID-19, both men and women react almost exactly the same. When putting the COVID-19 advice into practice, male and female respondents responded in the same way. To empower individuals to disrupt infodemic flows, COVID-19 needs to promote the digital literacy of both men and women.

References

  1. Abd-Alrazaq A., Alhuwail D., Househ M., Hamdi M., Shah Z. (2020). Top concerns of tweeters during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance study. J Med Internet Res, 22(4): e19016. DOI: 10.2196/19016.

  2. Azzopardi-Muscat, N. & Sørensen, K. (2019). Towards an equitable digital public health era: promoting equity through a health literacy perspective. European Journal of Public Health, 29(3), 13–17. DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckz166.

  3. Bagalkot, N. Verdezoto, N. Ghode, A. et. al. (2020). Beyond health literacy: navigating boundaries and relationships during high-risk pregnancies challenges and opportunities for digital health in North-West India. NordiCHI ’20, October 25–29, 2020, Tallinn, Estonia. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3419249.3420126.

  4. Bodie, G. D. & Dutta, M. J. (2008). Understanding health literacy for strategic health marketing: ehealth literacy, health disparities, and the digital divide. Health Marketing Quarterly, 25(1/2), 175-203. DOI: 10.1080/07359680802126301.

  5. Croucher, S.M., Nguyen, T. & Rahmani, D. (2020). Prejudice toward Asian Americans in the Covid-19 pandemic: The effects of social media use in the United States. Front. Commun., 5,39. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00039.

  6. Czymara, C.S., Langenkamp, A. & Cano, T. (2020). Cause for Concerns: Gender inequality in experiencing the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany. European Societies. DOI: 0.1080/14616696.2020.1808692.

  7. El-Awaisi, A., O’Carroll, V., Koraysh, S., Koummich, S. & Huber, M. (2020). Perceptions of who is in the healthcare team? A content analysis of social media posts during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 34:5, 622-632, DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1819779.

  8. Eysenbach, G. (2002). Infodemiology: the epidemiology of (mis)information. Am J Med. 113(9), P763-765. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01473-0.

  9. Frisch, A.-L., Camerini, L., Diviani, N., & Schulz, P. J. (2012). Defining and measuring health literacy: how can we profit from other literacy domains?. Health Promotion International, 27(1), 117-126. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dar043.

  10. Gracia, V., Alberto, D. Martinez. (2020). Fake news during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: a study through google trends. Revista Latina de Communicacion Social, (78), 169-182. DOI:10.4185/RLCS-2020-1473.

  11. Hakak S., Imran, M., Choo, K-K. R, & Shoaib, M. (2020). Have you been a victim of COVID-19-related cyber incidents? Survey, taxonomy, and mitigation strategies. IEEE Access, 8, 124134-124144. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3006172.

  12. Heo, K., Lee D., Seo Y., & Choi, H. (2020). Searching for digital technologies in containment and mitigation strategies: experience from South Korea COVID-19. Ann Glob Health, 31, 86(1), 109. DOI: 10.5334/aogh.2993.

  13. Karasneh, R., Al-Azzam, S., Soudah, O., Hawamdeh, S. & Khader, Y. (2020). Media’s effect on shaping knowledge, awareness risk perceptions and communication practices of pandemic COVID-19 among pharmacists. Res Social Adm Phar, 23. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.027.

  14. Kibbe, M. R. (2020). Concequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on manuscript submissions by women. JAMA Surg. 155(9): 803-804. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3917.

  15. Kurnia, Novi et.al. 2020. WhasApp Group and Digital Literacy Among Indonesian Women. Magister Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Gadjah Mada: Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

  16. Meskó, B., Drobni, Z., Bényei, É. et.al. (2017). Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. Mhealth, 3, 38. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.07.

  17. Moon, H., & Lee, G.H. (2020). Evaluation of Korean-language COVID-19–related medical information on YouTube: Cross-sectional infodemiology study. J Med Internet Res. 22(8), e20775. DOI: 10.2196/20775.

  18. Neter, E. & Brainin, E. (2012). eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. J Med Internet Res, 4(1): e19. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1619.

  19. Oyebode, O., Ndulue, C., Adib, A., Dinesh, M., et. al. (2020). Health, psychosocial, and social issues emanating from COVID-19 pandemic based on social media comments using natural language processing. AcXIV:2007.12144.

  20. Parker, R. M., Ratzan, S. C., & Lurie, N. (2003). Health literacy: a policy challenge for advancing high-quality health. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 22(4), 1247-153.

  21. Roberts, H., Seymour, B., Fish II, S. A., Robinson, E., & Zuckerman, E. (2017). Digital health communication and global public influence: A Study of the ebola epidemic. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 51-58. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1209598.

  22. Rosenbau, J. E., Johnson, B. K., & Deane, A. E. (2019). Health literacy and digital media use: Assessing the health literacy skills instrument short form and its correlates among African American college students. Digital Health, (4), 1–8. DOI: 10.1177/2055207618770765.

  23. Salathé, M. (2018). Digital epidemiology: what is it, and where is it going?. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 14(1), 1. DOI: 10.1186/s40504-017-0065-7.

  24. Talhouk, R., Mesmar, S., Thieme, A. et. al. (2016). Syrian refugees and digital health in Lebanon: Opportunities for improving antenatal health. ACM 978-1-4503-3362-7/16/05. DOI: 10.1145/2858036.2858331.

  25. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). (2008). Creating an Inclusive Society: Practical Strategies to Promote Social Integration. Final Report of the Expert Group Meeting. Retrieved 27 October 2020 from [http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2008/Paris-report.pdf].

  26. Wearesocial. (2020). Social Media Users Pass the 4 Billion Mark as Global Adoption Soars. Retrieved 27 October 2020 from [https://wearesocial.com/blog/2020/10/social-media-users-pass-the-4-billion-mark-as-global-adoption-soars].

  27. World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting Healthy Behaviours and Mitigating the Harm from Misinformation and Disinformation. Retrieved 27 October 2020 from [https://www.who.int/news/item/23-09-2020-managing-the-covid-19-infodemic-promoting-healthy-behaviours-and-mitigating-the-harm-from-misinformation-and-disinformation].

  28. Worldometers. (2020). Retrieved 15 November 2020 from [https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?].

bottom of page