top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political


ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
open access

Published: 25 September 2020

The Impact of Landlord Classes on Economic Improvement and Political Stability of China, Korea, and the Philippines: A Comparative Study

Ziyi Ma

Nanjing Foreign Language School, China

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 901-911

Keywords: Landlord Classes, Economic Improvement, Political Stability, China


As an indispensable part of Feudalism, the landlord classes contributed significantly to the local dominance of the central authority; however, with the collapse of feudal regimes, the landlord classes were widely regarded as obstacles towards the economic modernity and political stability. From the 1910s to 1950s, Korea(colonial Korea, later the Republic of Korea), Republic of China, and Philippines(the colonial Philippines, later the Republic of Philippines), countries shared a similar historic trait, from a feudal state to a foreign colony, then to an independent republic, all under the influence of the USA. Landlord classes in respective countries played an essential role in their historical development and fluctuated their roles with different authorities. The countries all put in efforts towards eliminating or controlling landlord classes to achieve new economic and political models. Using historical data and referencing to the previous analysis, this paper would demonstrate and compare the historic changes pursuing economic and political prosperity that concerned landlord classes of each country to prove the fact that two strategies can be adopted for local state building to achieve economic progress and political stability in that period: either destructing the landlord classes and carrying out land reforms, or having the absolute control of landlords and reaching co-option with them.


  1. China's Response to the West [Cambridge, Mass., 1954], p. 226.

  2. Schiffrin, Harold. "Sun Yat-Sen's Early Land Policy: The Origin and Meaning of 'Equalization of Land Rights.'"The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, 1957, pp. 549–564. JSTOR, Accessed 19 August 2020.

  3. Sun Yat-sen, Fundamentals of National Reconstruction (Taipei, 1953), Appendices, pp. 196-197.

  4. Chicago Sunday Tribune, (10 March10 March 1912), Sec. II, p. 1; quoted in Hou-Chun Chang, "China," in Land Value Taxation Around the World, ed. H. G. Brown and others (New York, 1955), p. 186

  5. San Min Chu-I discourses, Tsung-li ch'uian-chi, ed. Hu Han-min (Shanghai, 1930), I, 252.

  6. TLCS, VI, ts'e 1, 97.

  7. TLCS, VI, ts'e 1, 224.

  8. TLCS, VI, ts'e 1, 81

  9. EASTMAN, LLOYD E. (1974) The Abortive Revolution: China under Nationalist Rule. Cambridge, MA Harvard Univ. Press.

  10. WEISS, LINDA and JOHN HOBSON (1995) States and Economic Development: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

  11. LIN YIZHONG (1934) Reported speech. Guangdong hezuo 1, 1 (5 January): 1-5.

  12. WATSON, R. (1994) "Girls’ houses and working women: Expressive culture in the Pearl River delta, 1900-41," pp. 25-44 in Maria Jaschok and Suzanne Miers (eds.), Women and Chinese Patriarchy: Submission, Servitude and Escape. London: Zed Books.

  13. ZHEN LANGQUAN (1934) "Wei guoji hezuo jie quan ge xianshi zhidaoyuan" (Advice to guides in all towns and counties on International Cooperative Day). Guangdong hezuo 1, 19 (7 July7 July): 3-4.

  14. CEN RUOBIN(1935b) "Wancheng difang zizhi yu banli hezuo shiye: xu" (Completing local self-government and implementing cooperative enterprises: Continued). Guangdong hezuo 2, 30 (15 November): 5-8.

  15. LIN GAN (1935b) "Shunde xian hezuo shiye zhi huigu yu qianzhan: xu" (Reflections and projections on the cooperative enterprise in Shunde county: Continued). Guangdong hezuo 2, 2 (15 January): 2-5.

  16. WEN ZHONGQI (1935b) "Bensheng hezuo shiye gaikuang" (The general situation of the Guangdong cooperative enterprise). Guangdong hezuo 2, 24 (25 August): 1-4.

  17. Fitzgerald, John. "Warlords, Bullies, and State Building in Nationalist China: The Guangdong Cooperative Movement, 1932-1936." Modern China, vol. 23, no. 4, 1997, pp. 420–458. JSTOR, Accessed 20 August. 2020.

  18. FANG BINGSONG (1934) "Shantou zhidaoyuan meizhou gongzuo baogao" (Shantou guide weekly report for week of 24-30 September). Guangdong hezuo 1, 30 (25 October): 7-10.

  19. "Select Aggregates". Retrieved 27 July. 2018.

  20. BOWDEN, THOMAS R. “LAND REFORM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ON TAIWAN.” University College Review, vol. 1, no. 1, 1961, pp. 34-40. JSTOR, Accessed 20 August. 2020.

  21. "最新統計指標". 主計處. 行政院主計處. Retrieved 2 May2020.

  22. Anthony Y. C. Koo. “Economic Consequences of Land Reform in Taiwan.” Asian Survey, vol. 6, no. 3, 1966, pp. 150–157. JSTOR, Accessed 20 August. 2020.

  23. Palais, Politics and Policy in Traditional Korea.

  24. Edward W. Wagner, "The Ladder of Success in Yi Dynasty Korea," in James B. Palais, ed., Occasional Papers on Korea, no. 1 (Seattle: University of Washington, April 1974), 1–8.

  25. Andrew J. Grajdanzev, Modern Korea (New York: John Dey, 1944), 35.

  26. Kohli, Atul. State-directed development: political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge university press, 2004.

  27. Robert M. Spaulding, Jr., “The Bureaucracy as a Political Force, 1920–45,” in James William Morley, ed., Dilemmas of Growth in Prewar Japan (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971), 36–37.

  28. Government General of Chosen, Annual Report, 1911–12, 13.

  29. Government-General of Choson, Results of Three Years’ Administration, 64. See also Robinson in Eckert et al., Korea Old and New, 266–67.

  30. Sang-Chul Suh, Growth and Structural Changes in the Korean Economy, 73, table 33; Shigeru Ishikawa, Economic Development in Asian Perspective (Tokyo: Kinokuniya Bookstore, 1967), 84–109; and Ramon H. Myers and Yamada Suburo, “Agricultural Development in the Empire,” in Myers and Peattie, eds., Japanese Colonial Empire.

  31. Soon Won Park, Colonial Industrialization and Labor in Korea: The Onada Cement Factory, Harvard-Hallym Series on Korean Studies (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).

  32. Suk-Choon Cho, “The Bureaucracy,” in Edward R. Wright, ed., Korean Politics in Transition (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1975), 72–73.

  33. Ki Hyuk Pak et al., A Study of Land Tenure System in Korea (Seoul: Korea Land Economics Research Center, 886)

  34. “Tenant-Landlord Conflict, 1933–39: Class and Nation.” Peasant Protest and Social Change in Colonial Korea, by Gi-Wook Shin, University of Washington Press, Seattle; London, 2014, pp. 114–132. JSTOR, Accessed 21 August 2020.

  35. Bank of Chosun, Chosun Kyongje Nyonbo {Annual Economic Review of Korea) of 1948 , Seoul,1

  36. Shin, Yong-Ha. "LAND REFORM IN KOREA, 1950." Bulletin of the Population and Development Studies Center, vol. 5, 1976, pp. 20. JSTOR, Accessed 21 August 2020.

  37. Jeon, Yoong‐Deok, and Young‐Yong Kim. "Land Reform, Income Redistribution, and Agricultural Production in Korea." Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 48, no. 2, 2000, pp. 253–268. JSTOR, Accessed 21 August 2020.

  38. 38.

  39. Phelan, John L. 1959 The hispanization of the Philippines. Madison, Wis., University of Wisconsin Press.

  40. Pelzer, K. J. 1945 Pioneer settlement in the Asiatic tropics. New York, American Geographical Society.

  41. MURRAY, FRANCIS J. “Land Reform in the Philippines: An Overview.” Philippine Sociological Review, vol. 20, no. 1/2, 1972, pp. 151-168. JSTOR, Accessed 23 August 2020.

  42. Sacay, Orlando J. 1963 The Philippine land reform program. Philippine Economic Journal 2: 169

  43. Wurfel, David 1959 Foreign aid and social reform in political development: A Philippine case study. American Political Science Review 53 (2): 456-83.

  44. Frances L. Starner’s Magsaysay and the Philippine politics, 1953-1956 (1961).

  45. Starner, F. L. 1961 Magsaysay and the Philippine peasantry: The agrarian impact on Philippine politics, 1953-1956. Berkeley, Calif., University of California Press.

  46. Ruttan, Vernon W. 1966 Tenure and productivity of Philippine rice producing farms. Philippine Economic Journal 5 (1): 42-63.

  47. Association of Asian Studies in Boston, Massachusetts, 1-3 April 1974

  48. Daily Express (Manila), 23 October I973, p. Iff.

  49. Times Journal (International Weekly Edition, Manila), 30 March I974, p. If.

  50. Conrado F. Estrella, Secretary, Department of Agrarian Reform, "A Comprehensive Report to the President of the Philippines," (Quezon City: Department of Agrarian Reform, October I973), p. 7

  51. Kerkvliet, Benedict J. "Land Reform in the Philippines Since the Marcos Coup." Pacific Affairs, vol. 47, no. 3, 1974, pp. 286–304. JSTOR, Accessed 24 August 2020.

  52. U. S. Agency for International Development, Land Reform: integrated Development Program for Nueva Ecija (Manila: circa I971).

  53. Jim Richardson, "Does Grass-Roots Action Lead to Agrarian Reform?," in Lynch (ed.), op. cit., pp. I43-50;

  54. F. Sionil Jose, "Memo to the United States Congress," Solidarity, Manila, 6 (May I97'), p. 4.

  55. Lilia C. Panganiban, "Land Reform Administrative Procedures in the Philippines" (Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin, LTC No. 82, 1972?), pp. 33-34.

  56. 56.

bottom of page