Blockchain, Legal Interpretation, and Contextuality as Tools to Establish Privacy and Fundamental Rights Protection Amid Geopolitical and Legal Uncertainty
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Law and Humanities
Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2827-9735

Judge Gavel
 Scales of Justice
City Crowds
People in Library
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 22 December 2023

Blockchain, Legal Interpretation, and Contextuality as Tools to Establish Privacy and Fundamental Rights Protection Amid Geopolitical and Legal Uncertainty

Pierangelo Blandino

University of Lapland

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1996.02.04.95

Pages: 179-184

Keywords: Blockchain, Legal Interpretation, Contextuality, Privacy, Fundamental Rights Protection

Abstract

This summary explores the degree of rights’ protection when it comes to States forms of surveillance under a concise legal comparative outline. Given today’s interdependence put into being first by Global Governance patterns and then by exchange on platforms, attention will be drawn to the Chinese Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), American Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (Cloud Act) and the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), along with the recently adopted Data Privacy Framework (DPF). At a second stage, new possible techniques are considered to properly tackle these unprecedented changes that challenge traditional legal patterns.

References

Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and Informatics, 36, 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
Colber, A. J. (2018). Not-So-Smart Blockchain Contracts and Artificial Responsibility. Stanford Technology Law Review, 21(2), 198.
De Vauplane, H. (2018). Blockchain and intermediated securities. NIPR. https://www.kramerlevin.com/a/web/37847/1804-NIPR-Vauplane-Hubert-de-Blockchain-and-intermediated-securi.pdf
Dickson, J. (2008). Interpretation and coherence in legal reasoning. Stanford: Encyclopaedia of Philosophy.
Fairfield, J. A. T. (2014). Smart Contracts, Bitcoin Bots, and Consumer Protection. 71 WASH. & LEE L. REV. ONLINE 36. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol71/iss2/3.
Garcia-Teruel, R. M. (2020). Legal Challenges and Opportunities of Blockchain Technology In The Real Estate Sector. Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law: Volume 12 Issue 2, 2020. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4304743.
Gervais, D. (2018). Blockchain and smart contracts: the missing link in copyright licensing. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 314. https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/IJLIT_2018.pdf
Gstrein, O., & Beaulieu, A. (2022). How to protect privacy in a datafied society? A presentation of multiple legal and conceptual approaches. Philos. Technol. 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00497-4
Hildén, J. (2021). Mitigating the risk of US surveillance for public sector services in the cloud. Communication Rights in the Age of Digital Disruption, University of Helsinki, Finland. PUBLISHED ON: 30 Sep 2021. DOI: 10.14763/2021.3.1578
Le Grand Continent (VV.AA.). (2022). État, puissance et technologie : le techno-nationalisme à Washington, , https://legrandcontinent.eu/fr/2022/04/21/etat-puissance-et-technologie-le-techno-nationalisme-a-washington/
Title English translation: State, power and technology: techno-nationalism in Washington
Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Harper Collins.
Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. Soho Books.
Maurer, W., & DuPont, Q. (2015). Ledgers and Law in the Blockchain. MIT Press. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6k65w4h3
National Security Strategy report, §Securing Cyberspace, p. 34 https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf
Oracle (VV.AA.). (2022). Permissioned Blockchain https://developer.oracle.com/learn/technical-articles/permissioned-blockchain#:~:text=Permissioned%20blockchains%20are%20blockchains%20that,accessed%20by%20users%20with%20permissions
Rantala, J. (2017). Blockchain as a Medium for Transindividual Collective, quoting K. O'Hara, ‘Smart Contracts – Dumb Idea’. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(2), 97–101. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337634161_Blockchain_as_a_medium_for_transindividual_collective
Richards, N. (2021). Why Privacy Matters (Chapter one). Oxford University Press. Chapter one.
Risse, M. (2023). Political Theory of the Digital Age: Where Artificial Intelligence Might Take Us. Cambridge University Press.
Sklolnikoff, E. (1993). The Elusive Transformation. Princeton University Press.
Solove, D. J. (2020). The Myth of the Privacy Paradox. GW Law Faculty Publications
(VV. AA). (2021). Smart legal contracts Advice to Government, UK, 88.
Werbach, K. (2009). The blockchain and the new architecture of trust. MIT Press
Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2580664 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580664.


bottom of page