top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
open access

Published: 30 April 2021

“Competence Areas” as a New Notion Instead of Teacher Competencies

Bilge Bağci Ayranci, Ahmet Başkan

Aydın Adnan Menderes University (Turkey), Hitit University (Turkey)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 1-14

Keywords: Competence Areas, Teacher Competence, Curriculum, Turkish Lesson


The concept of "teacher competence" has been used as a defining concept in explaining the competence levels of teachers in different fields since the early 2000s. However, with the publication of the 2019 Turkish course curriculum, it was seen that this concept was not included in the program, but instead "competence areas" were explained in detail. In this context, the study aimed to evaluate the 2019 Turkish Lesson Curriculum in terms of teacher competencies. Before the publication of the curriculum 2019, primary teaching competencies in the literature were investigated and listed, and the Turkish lesson curriculum was then evaluated considering those teacher competencies. In the 2019 Turkish Lesson Curriculum, unlike other programs, the scope and content of competency areas were defined in detail. Thus, the analysis of competency areas by teacher competence contributes to the literature. In the literature, teacher competencies were associated with various skills such as "digital competence," "learning to learn," "social and civic competencies" and "the sense of initiative and entrepreneurship." The 2019 Turkish Lesson Curriculum was assessed considering those skills. Accordingly, in the Turkish Lesson Curriculum 2019, the most critical competence area is the "digital competence" dimension. We can see the reflections of digital competence in the definition of skills and educational text types. The precondition for fostering digital competence in students is that teachers have digital competence. Thus, it is suggested to redefine and determine teaching competencies, knowledge, and skills related to "digital competence.”


  1. Aksoy, V. & Diken, İ. H. (2009). Analysis of counseling teachers' self-efficacy perceptions regarding psychological counseling and guidance in special education, Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 709-719.

  2. Aktağ, I., & Walter, J. (2005). Teacher candidates' professional competence. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 3(4), 127-132.

  3. Aliyev, R., & Öğülmüş, S. (2015). Investigation of foreign students’ intercultural interaction perception in Turkey. Education and Society in the 21st Century, The Journal of Education Sciences and Social Researches, 4(12).

  4. Altunçekiç, A., Yaman, S. & Koray, Ö. (2005). A Study on pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and problem-solving skills (Kastamonu city example), 13(1), Kastamonu Journal of Education, 93-102.

  5. Arı, E., Yılmaz, V. (2015). Hopelessness levels of teacher candidates attending KPSS preparation course, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(4), 905-931.

  6. Aslan, N., & Cansever, B. A. (2007). A cross-cultural comparison of parent-child interaction in participating in social activities at school. Ege Journal of Education, 8(1), 113-130.

  7. Aydınlı, S. (2015). The constructivist paradigm in design education: Learning to learn’. Journal of Design & Theory, 11(20), 1-18.

  8. Azar, A. (2010). Self-efficacy beliefs of secondary school science and mathematics teacher candidates, ZKÜ Journal of Social Sciences, 6(12), 35–252.

  9. Bağcı, B. (2007). 4th-grade Turkish language students’ professional competence, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Gazi University, The Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

  10. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

  11. Buldu, M. (2014). A system level proposal on teacher competency assessment and teacher professional development, Milli Eğitim, 44(204), 114-134.

  12. Can, E. (2019). Professional development of teachers: Obstacles and suggestions. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(4), 1618-1650.

  13. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Sage.

  14. Çermik, H. Şahin, A., Doğan, B. (2017). Classroom teacher candidates' perceptions of professional choice: A longitudinal analysis, Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 32(3): 643-658.

  15. Çetinkaya, R. (2007). Turkish teacher candidates' professional competence perceptions and attitudes, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Selcuk University, The Institute of Social Sciences, Konya.

  16. Commission. (2008). Teacher Special Field Competencies. MoNE Publications.

  17. Coşkun, K., Metin, M., Birşiçi, S., Yılmaz, G. K. (2010). Professional competence of classroom teachers with different professional experiences, The international conference on new trends in education and their implications, 11-13 November, ISBN: 978 605 364 104 9.

  18. Demirel, M. (2009). Lifelong learning and technology. 9th. International Educational Technology Conference (IETC).6-8 May 2009. Hacettepe University, Ankara.

  19. Dilekmen, M. (2008). Effective teaching for effective education. Atatürk University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 12(2), 213-221.

  20. Dönmez, C., Uslu, S. (2013). Social studies teacher candidates' attitudes towards teaching profession, Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 42-63.

  21. European Commission (2007). Key competencies for lifelong learnıng European reference framework.

  22. Geçgel, H., Kana, F. ve Eren, D. (2020). The analysis of digital competence in Turkish education. The Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 8(3), 886-904.

  23. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal.

  24. Göçer, A. (2018). An examination of Turkish teachers’ field competencies by assessment and evaluation components and performance indicators. BEÜ SBE Journal, 7(1), 194-210.

  25. Göktaş, Z. (2017). Physical education and sports teacher candidates’ attitudes towards the teaching profession, The International Journal of Social Research, 10, 51, 1290-1295.

  26. Gündoğdu, K., Aytaçlı, B., Aydoğan, R., Yıldırım, C. (2015). Content analysis of articles on teacher competencies. Adnan Menderes University the Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, December, 2015, 6(2), 30-43.

  27. (Date of Access: 12.01.2021), 73-84.

  28. Karacaoğlu, Ö. C. (2008). Teachers' competence perceptions. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 5(1), 70-97.

  29. Karadağ, E. (2007). The teacher competence scale based on constructivist learning: Validity and reliability analysis. The Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 7(1), 153-175.

  30. Karadağ, R. (2012). Turkish teacher candidates' attitudes towards the teaching profession and the reasons for choosing the teaching profession, e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 7(2).

  31. Karakelle, S. (2005) A review of teachers' definitions of effective teachers by effective teaching dimensions, Education and Science, 30(135), 1-10.

  32. Karasar, N. (2007). Scientific Research Method, 17th Edition, Nobel Publications.

  33. Kiraz, E. (2003). The development of practitioner teacher competency scale. The Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(4).

  34. Kızıltepe, Z. (2002). Competent and effective teacher. Education and Science, 27(126).

  35. Kocasaraç, H. (2003). Teacher competencies regarding the use of computers in education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 77-85.

  36. Maltepe, S. (2011). Turkish teacher candidates’ opinions about special field competencies. Education Sciences, 6(2), 1868-1877.

  37. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis, 1(1), 1-17.

  38. O’leary, Z. (2017). The essential guide to doing research. Sage Publications Ltd.

  39. Özbek, R., Kahyaoğlu, M., Özgen, N. (2007). An assessment of teacher candidates’ views on the teaching profession, The Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 221-232.

  40. Özkan, M., & Arslantaş, H. İ. (2013). A scaling study of effective teacher characteristics: The use of sorting method. Trakya University, Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 311-330.

  41. Özlük, Y. Ö. (2010). A research on turkish teachers' special field competencies: Kırıkkale case (Master's Thesis, Kırıkkale University).

  42. Pan, V., & Akay, C. (2015). An analysis of entrepreneurship levels of education faculty students. Education Sciences, 10(2), 125-138.

  43. Payne, G., & Payne, J. (2004). Key concepts in social research. Sage Publications.

  44. Salminen, A., Kauppinen, K., & Lehtovaara, M. (1997). Towards a methodology for document analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(7), 644-655.

  45. Şahin, A. (2011). Effective teacher behaviors and teaching perceptions. The Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty of Ahi Evran University, 12(1), 239-259.

  46. Şahin, İ. (2011). Prospective teachers' views on teacher employment and professional future, Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 1167-1184.

  47. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Teo, T. (2015). Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 88, 202-214.

  48. Şen, H. Ş., & Erişen, Y. (2002). Useful teaching practices of instructors in teacher training institutions. Gazi University, The Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 22(1).

  49. Şengül, K. (2012). Turkish teachers’ special field competencies: A case study. (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Fırat University, The Institute of Educational Sciences, Elazığ.

  50. Şimşek, A., Büyükkıdık, S. (2015). An analysis of retired teachers' views on life satisfaction. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, The Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(6), 19-41.

  51. Şişman, M. (2009). Teacher competencies: A modern discourse and rhetoric. The Journal of İnönü University Education Faculty, 10(3), 63-82.

  52. Sünbül, A. M. (1996). Teacher qualifications and their roles in teaching. The Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 2(4), 597-608.

  53. Temizyürek, F., & Aksoy, T. (2016). A Study on Turkish teachers' special field competencies. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, (38), 103-117.

  54. The Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2019). Turkish Lesson Curriculum (Primary and secondary school 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades). Ankara: National Education Press.

  55. Yenilmez, K. and Ata, A. (2013). "Analysis of Theses on Using Technology in Mathematics Education," Abstracts of 7th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium (ICITS), 119-120, Atatürk University, 6-8 June 2013, Erzurum, Turkey.

  56. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. 7. Edition, Seçkin Publishing.

  57. Yılmaz, A. S. (2014). Entrepreneurship education as a social change agent. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 6(1), 297-310.

  58. Yılmaz, İ. (2010). Turkish teacher candidates’ perceptions of special field and self-efficacy. (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Erzurum: Atatürk University, The Institute of Social Sciences.

bottom of page