Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 10 August 2022

Teachers' Ability in Writing Mathematical Literacy Module Based on Local Context

Agus Susanta, Irwan Koto, Edi Susanto

University of Bengkulu, Indonesia

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.03.536

Pages: 173-179

Keywords: Teachers’ Ability, Module, Mathematics Literacy, Local Context, Descriptive Research

Abstract

One problem in elementary schools in facilitating students' literacy skills is the limitation of teaching materials. This study aims to explore the ability of elementary school teachers to write mathematical literacy modules based on the Bengkulu context. This research is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. Subjects consisted of two groups taken from 40 postgraduate students of elementary school teachers’ education FKIP UNIB. Data were collected using ability tests, document analysis, and interviews. The results showed that: (1) there were differences in students' abilities to understand teaching materials before and after developing the module. (2) the fresh graduate students are better at choosing local context problems, designing modules, and displaying modules. (3) students from elementary school teachers tend to be better at developing indicators, presenting material, and examples of reinforcement. (4) the literacy mathematics module-based local context has met the criteria valid in terms of construction, material, language, and readability.

References

  1. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Revisi) (Research Procedure: A Practical Approach (Revised). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

  2. Arvyaty, A., Salim, S., & Maryanti, E. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa Dengan Pendekatan Metacognitive Guidance (The Development of Teaching Materials to Improve Students' Mathematical Literacy Ability With Metacognitive Guidance Approach). In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA 2017 (Vol. 2), pp 19-29

  3. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches: The fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  4. Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. (2017). Implementasi Kecakapan Abad 21 dalam Penyusunan RPP (The Implementation of 21st Century Skills in the Preparation of Lesson plan). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

  5. Fajriyah, E. (2018). Peran Etnomatematika Terkait Konsep Matematika Dalam Mendukung Literasi (The Role of Ethnomathematics Related to Mathematical Concepts in Supporting Literacy). Jurnal Prisma 1, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, Pp 114–119.

  6. Graff, H. J. (2006). Literacy. Microsoft® Encarta® [DVD] Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.

  7. Haji, S., Yumiati, & Zamzaili. (2018). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyesaikan Soal-Soal PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) di SMP Kota Bengkulu (Analysis of Student Difficulties in Completing PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) Questions at Bengkulu City Middle School). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, pp 20-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jpmr.v3i2.7522

  8. Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford University Press.

  9. Kharizmi, M. (2015). Kesulitan Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi (The Difficulties of Elementary School Students in Improving Literacy Ability). Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2 (2).pp 11-21

  10. Masjaya, M., & Wardono, W. (2018). Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika dalam Meningkatkan SDM (The Importance of Mathematical Literacy Ability to Grow Mathematical Connection Ability in Improving Human Resources). In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1 (2), pp. 568-574.

  11. Mendikbud. (2014). Lampiran I Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 58, Tahun 2014, tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah(Appendix I Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 58 of 2014 concerning the 2013 Curriculum for Junior High Schools/Madrasah Tsanawiyah)

  12. Ming, K. (2012). 10 Content-Area Literacy Strategies for Art, Mathematics, Music, and Physical Education. The Clearing House, 85: 213-220.

  13. Nur, A., & Palopo, S. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif dan Gender (Profile of Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability Viewed from Differences in Cognitive Style and Gender). Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreaktif-Inovatif, 9(2), pp.139–148.DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i2.15067

  14. OECD. (2009). Learning Mathematics for Life: A Perspective from PISA. OECD Publishing.

  15. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing.

  16. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015; PISA Results in Focus. PISA- OECD Publishing.

  17. Prastowo, A. (2011). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif (Creative Guide to Making Innovative Teaching Materials). Yogyakarta: Diva Press

  18. Purnomo, S., & Dafik. (2015). Analisis Respon Siswa Terhadap Soal PISA Konten Shape and Space dengan Rasch Model (The Analysis of Student Responses to PISA Questions in Shape and Space Content with Rasch Model). Jurnal Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2015 (Universitas Jember, 2015).

  19. Puspitasari, Agustin, Setiawani, S., & Nurcholif, D. S. (2015). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas X MIPA 5 SMA Negeri 1 Ambulu Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika (The Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Ability of 10 th grade Students Mathematics and Natural Sciences 5 State Senior High School 1 Ambulu Based on Mathematical Ability). Artikel Ilmiah, 1–6.

  20. Salim, D. (2019). Keterampilan matematika di Abad 21(Mathematical Skills in the 21st Century). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 5(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET. 2014.7155689

  21. Sasongko, T. P. M., Dafik, & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2016). Pengembangan Paket Soal Model PISA Konten Space and Shape untuk Mengetahui Level Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP (The Development of Package Model of PISA Content Space and Shape in Purpose to Know the Mathematics Literacy Level of Junior High School Student). Jurnal Edukasi, 3(1), 27–32.DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v3i1.4317 

  22. Satgas. (2018). Strategi Literasi Dalam Pembelajaran di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Literacy Strategy in Learning in Junior High School). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

  23. Setiawan, H., Dafik, & Lestari. (2014). Soal Matematika dalam PISA Kaitannya dengan Literasi Matematika dan Keterampilan Tingkat Tinggi (Mathematics Problems in PISA Relation to Mathematical Literacy and Higher Level Skills). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, Universitas Jember, Pp 244-251.

  24. Stacey, K. (2010). Mathematical and Scientific Literacy Around The World. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, pp 1-16.

  25. Sungkono. (2009). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar (The Development of Teaching Materials). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

  26. Wardhani, S., & R. (2011). Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS (Assessment Instruments for Middle School Mathematics Learning Outcome: Learning from PISA and TIMSS).