The Language Proficiency and Process Skills of Filipino High School Teachers

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

Published: 20 September 2019

The Language Proficiency and Process Skills of Filipino High School Teachers

Abigail Alviz

Centro Escolar University

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.93

Pages: 615-628

Keywords: Language Proficiency, Process Skills, High School Teachers

Abstract

This study employed the Test of English Proficiency for Teachers-Process Skills Test (TEPT-PST) results of Grades 7-10 Science and Math public high school teachers in the Philippines. Qualitative and quantitative designs were applied, along with secondary data, to analyze the subtests in the teacher assessment consisting of Structure, Written Expression, Reading Comprehension, and Process Skills. Findings show that teachers are proficient in reading comprehension items but find difficulty in expressing themselves in written form. Analyses of the competencies show that assessed teachers performed poorly in using articles and noun forms, decoding meaning from a word, and inferring. Lastly, the implications in the teaching-learning process were discussed to provide recommendations based on the evidences.

References

  1. Archer, J. (1998). The link to higher scores. Education Week, 18(5), 10-21.
  2. Bacher-Hicks, A., Chin, M., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2015). Validating Components of Teacher Effectiveness: A Random Assignment Study of Value-Added, Observation, and Survey Scores. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.
  3. Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416-440.
  4. Department of Education-Bureau of Education Assesment. Report Card: Teacher’s English Proficiency Test and Process Skills Test for Grade 1 to Grade 10. (2018).
  5. Department of Education. National Education Testing and Research Center. (2002). Teacher Effectiveness Indicators.
  6. Briscoe, F., Arriaza, G., & Henze, R. C. (2009). The power of talk: How words change our lives. Corwin Press.
  7. Cummins, J. (1984). Language proficiency and academic achievement revisited: A response. DOCUMENT RESUME ED 240 882 FL 014 259 AUTHOR Rivera, Charlene, Ed. TITLE Language Proficiency and Academic Achievement. Multilingual Matters 10., 400, 90.
  8. Department of Education Memorandum No. 127 s. 2016. Administration of Test of English Proficiency for Teachers and Process Skills Test in Science and Mathematics for Grades 7 and 8 Public School Teachers.
  9. Fong-Yee, D., & Normore, A. H. (2013). The impact of quality teachers on student achievement.
  10. Andrew, M. D., Cobb, C. D., & Giampietro, P. J. (2005). Verbal ability and teacher effectiveness. Journal of teacher education, 56(4), 343-354.
  11. Glazerman, S., & Protik, A. (2015). Validating value-added measures of teacher performance. Unpublished manuscript.
  12. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of educational research, 66(3), 361-396.
  13. Hanushek, E. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data. The American Economic Review, 61(2), 280-288.
  14. Haycock, K. (1998). Good Teaching Matters: How Well-Qualified Teachers Can Close the Gap.
  15. Thinking k-16, 3(2), n2.
  16. Heck, R. H. (2009). Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: Investigating a multilevel cross-classified model. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(2), 227-249.
  17. Herman, J. L., & Golan, S. (1993). The effects of standardized testing on teaching and schools. Educational measurement: Issues and practice, 12(4), 20-25.
  18. Kane, R. G., & Francis, A. (2013). Preparing teachers for professional learning: is there a future for teacher education in new teacher induction?. Teacher Development, 17(3), 362-379.
  19. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2002). The promise and pitfalls of using imprecise school accountability measures. Journal of Economic perspectives, 16(4), 91-114.
  20. Pascual, N. T. (2014). Impact of Mathematics and Science Instructional Practices, Curriculum and Academic Achievement to the Career Choice of Laboratory School Graduates of University of
  21. Rizal System-Morong. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 15(1), 397-415.
  22. Racca, R. M. A. B., & Lasaten, R. (2016). English language proficiency and academic performance of Philippine science high school students. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 2(2), 44-49.
  23. Rahman, F., Jumani, N. B., Akhter, Y., Chisthi, S. U. H., & Ajmal, M. (2011). Relationship between training of teachers and effectiveness teaching. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4).
  24. Rotherham, A. J., & Mead, S. (2003). Teacher quality: Beyond no child left behind. A response to Kaplan and Owings (2002). NASSP Bulletin, 87(635), 65-76.
  25. Rowan, B., Chiang, F. S., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement. Sociology of Education, 256-284.
  26. Sehgal, P., Nambudiri, R., & Mishra, S. K. (2017). Teacher effectiveness through self-efficacy, collaboration and principal leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(4), 505-517.
  27. Strauss, R. P., & Sawyer, E. A. (1986). Some new evidence on teacher and student competencies. Economics of Education Review, 5(1), 41-48.
  28. UNESCO, G. (2015). Education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. EFA Global Monitoring Report, 500.
  29. Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational research, 73(1), 89-122.
  30. Yusof, F. M., & Halim, H. (2014). Understanding teacher communication skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 471-476.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle