Theories-based Inclusive Education Practices

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

Published: 17 June 2019

Theories-based Inclusive Education Practices

Zaid Al-Shammari, Paula E. Faulkner, Chris Forlin

Kuwait University, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University

pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

10.31014/aior.1993.02.02.73

Pages: 408-414

Keywords: Inclusive Education, Behaviourism, Cognitivism, Constructivism

Abstract

This review paper examines the theories of behaviourism, cognitivism, and constructivism that are considered to underpin the theory and practice of inclusive education. We argue that education practices related to the inclusion of students with special educational needs can be derived from each of the three theoretical perspectives. By adopting an eclectic approach to the use of theory-driven inclusive education, we suggest that inclusive education practices best serve the needs of all students, including those with special needs.

References

  1. Abramson, C. I. (2013). Problems of teaching the behaviorist perspective in the cognitive revolution. Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 55–71. doi:10.3390/bs3010055.

  2. Akpan, J. P. & Beard, L. A. (2016). Using constructivist teaching strategies to enhance academic outcomes of students with special needs. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 392–398. doi:10.13189/ujer.2016.040211.

  3. Al-Shammari, Z. (2019A). Using evidence-based behaviorism instructional strategies with effect size in inclusive elementary schools in Kuwait. International Journal for Research in Education.

  4. Al-Shammari, Z. (2019B). Using evidence-based cognitive teaching strategies with effect size in inclusion classrooms in Kuwait. Saudi Journal of Special Education, 10.

  5. Al-Shammari, Z., Al-Sharoufi, H., & Yawkey, T. D. (2008). The effectiveness of direct instruction in teaching English subject in the elementary public education school in Kuwait: A case study. Education, 129(3), 80–90. 

  6. Artiles, A. J., Dorn, S., & Christensen, C. (2006). Learning in inclusive education research: Re-mediating theory and methods with a transformative agenda. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 65–108. doi:10.3102/0091732X030001065.

  7. Botha, J. & Kourkoutas, E. (2016). A community of practice as an inclusive model to support children with social, emotional, and behavioural difficulties in school contexts. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(7), 784–799. doi:10.1080/13603116.2015.1111448.

  8. Boyle, J. R. & Rivera, T. Z. (2012). Note-taking techniques for students with disabilities: A systematic review of the research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(3), 131–143. doi:10.1177/0731948711435794.

  9. Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Complex constructivism: A theoretical model of complexity and cognition. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(3),  485–498.

  10. Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. doi:10.1002/piq.21143.

  11. Evgeniou, E. & Loizou, P. (2012). The theoretical base of e-learning and its role in surgical education. Journal of Surgical Education, 69(5), 665–669. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.06.005.

  12. Harold, V. L. & Corcoran, T. (2013). Discourses on behaviour: A role for restorative justice? International Journal on School Disaffection, 10(2), 45–61. doi:10.18546/IJSD.10.2.03.

  13. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.

  14. Hickey, G. (2014). The importance of learning philosophies on technology selection in education. Journal of Learning Design, 7(3), 16–22. doi:10.5204/jld.v7i3.184.

  15. Hornby, G. (2014). Inclusive special education: Evidence-based practices for children with special needs and disabilities. New York: Springer.

  16. Hulgin, K. M. & Drake, B. M. (2011). Inclusive education and the No Child Left Behind Act: Resisting entrenchment. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(4), 389–404. doi:10.1080/13603110903030105.

  17. Lenjani, I. (2016). Constructivism and behaviorism methodologies on special needs education. European Journal of Special Education Research, 1(1), 17–24. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.2769586.

  18. Liu, C. C. & Ju, I. (2010). Evolution of constructivism. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(4), 63–66. doi:10.19030/cier.v3i4.199.

  19. McLeskey, J., Hoppey, D., Williamson, P., & Rentz, T. (2004). Is inclusion an illusion? An examination of national and state trends toward the education of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(2), 109–115.

  20. Mowat, J. G. (2010). Inclusion of pupils perceived as experiencing Social and Emotional Behavioural Difficulties (SEBD): Affordances and constraints. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(6), 631–648. doi:10.1080/13603110802626599.

  21. Nalliah, S. & Idris, N. (2014). Applying the learning theories to medical education: A commentary. International E-Journal of Science, Medicine & Education, 8(1), 50–57.

  22. Petersen, K. B. (2014). Learning theories and skills in online second language teaching and learning: Dilemmas and challenges. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 18(2), 41–51.

  23. Salend, S. J. (2011). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices (seventh edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.

  24. Shi, J. (2013). The application of constructivism: Activities for enlivening comprehensive English class. English language Teaching, 6(2), 63–70. doi:10.5539/elt.v6n2p63

  25. Slavin, R. E. (2009). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (9th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

  26. Steele, M. M. (2005). Teaching students with learning disabilities: Constructivism or behaviorism? Current Issues in Education, 8(10), 1–5.

  27. Subotić, S., & Anđić, B. (2014). The decline in socialization at the transition from class to subject teaching in the inclusion. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, 13(3), 293-309.

  28. Swanson, H. L., Orosco, M. J., & Lussier, C. M. (2014). The effects of mathematics strategy instruction for children with serious problem-solving difficulties. Exceptional Children, 80(2), 149–168. doi:10.1177/001440291408000202.

  29. Tunmer, W., Chapman, J., Greatney, K., & Prochnow, J. (2002). The contribution of educational psychology to intervention research and practice. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49(1), 11–29.

  30. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework on special needs education. Paris: UNESCO.

  31. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2016). General Comment No. 4 - Article 24: Right to Inclusive Education, Retrieved from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/57c977e34.html

  32. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  33. West, C. K., Farmer, J. A., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.

  34. Wittrock, M. C. & Alesandrini, K. (1990). Generation of summaries and analogies and analytic and holistic abilities. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 489–502. doi:10.3102/00028312027003489.

  35. Zhang, X., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J., Miller, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K. T., Lin, T. J. & Latawiec, B. (2016). Improving children’s competence as decision makers: Contrasting effects of collaborative interaction and direct instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 194–223. doi:10.3102/0002831215618663.

About Us

The Asian Institute of Research is an online and open-access platform to publish recent research and articles of scholars worldwide. Founded in 2018 and based in Indonesia, the Institute serves as a platform for academics, educators, scholars, and students from Asia and around the world, to connect with one another. The Institute disseminates research that is proven or predicted to be of significant influence for the general public.

Stay Connected

  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle

Contact Us

Please send all inquiries to the email:

editorial@asianinstituteofresearch.org

Business Address:

5th Floor, Kavling 507, Fajar Graha Pena Tower, Jl. Urip Sumohardjo No.20, Makassar, Indonesia 90234

Copyright © 2018 The Asian Institute of Research. All rights reserved