Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 25 May 2022

Validity Analysis of Development of Socrates-Based Linear Aljebra E-Modules

Dwi Rahmawati, Ira Vahlia, Mustika, Tina Yunarti, Nurhanurawati

Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro (Indonesia), Universitas Lampung (Indonesia)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.02.495

Pages: 357-364

Keywords: E-Modules, Socrates, Validity

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the validity level of Socrates-based linear algebra e-module, both material validity and design. This is a research and development (R&D) with ADDIE procedure: analysis, design, develop, implement, and evaluate. The participants were 30 students and 2 lecturers who supervised linear algebra courses in the mathematics education study program of Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro. Data collection techniques uses questionnaires provided to material and design validators. Data analysis uses quantitative descriptive. The results showed that the validity rate xof Socrates-based linear algebra e-modules on material aspects was 81.33% with highly valid categories and on design aspects 88% with highly valid categories. Based on the results of the study obtained the conclusion that the e-module algebra linear based on Socrates is declared very valid. Furthermore, further research can be conducted related to the use of Socrates-based linear algebra e-modules in learning to find out effectiveness of using e-modules.

References

  1. Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 68–72.

  2. Anwar, R. B., & Rahmawati, D. (2017). The use of mathematical module based on constructivism approach as media to implant the concept of algebra operation. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 579–583.

  3. Ariyanto, A., Priyayi, D. F., & Dewi, L. (2018). Penggunaan media pembelajaran biologi di sekolah menengah atas (sma) swasta salatiga [The use of biological learning media in private senior high school of Salatiga]. BIOEDUKASI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 9(1), 1–13.

  4. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer Science & Business Media.

  5. Ceyhan, M. A. (2022). Examination of Information and Communication Technologies Competencies of Teacher Candidates Studying at the Faculty of Sport Sciences. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(1), 506-515

  6. Ekayanti, A. (2017). PENGEMBANGAN MODUL IRISAN KERUCUT BERBANTUAN GEOGEBRA [Development of Geogebra Assistant Cones Module]. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 308–314.

  7. Ernawati, & A Muhajir Nasir. (2018). Efektivitas Metode Pembelajaran Socrates Kontekstual Berbasis Gaya Kognitif terhadap Hasil Belajar Statistik Dasar [The effectiveness of contextual socratic learning method based on cognitive style on basic statistics learning outcomes]. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 31–44.

  8. Gazali, R. Y. (2016). Pengembangan bahan ajar matematika untuk siswa SMP berdasarkan teori belajar ausubel [Development of mathematics teaching materials for junior high school students based on ausubel learning theory]. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 183–184.

  9. Johnson, J. D., & Williams, C. (2020). Mobile Learning Features Preferred: An Examination of Students in the United Arab Emirates. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15, em0596.

  10. Lestari, E., & As’ari, A. R. (2013). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Soal Cerita Matematika Kontekstual Berbahasa Inggris Untuk Siswa Kelas X [Development of contextual math story problem learning module in English for Class X students]. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

  11. Maskur, R., Nofrizal, N., & Syazali, M. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Macromedia Flash [Development of mathematics learning media with macromedia flash]. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 177–186.

  12. Nafsiah, I. N., & Rizal, F. (n.d.). VALIDITAS PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PEMBELAJARAN PROJECT BASED LEARNING PADA MATA KULIAH MANAJEMEN PROYEK DI PENDIDIKAN TEKNIK BANGUNAN FT-UNP [Validity of project based learning module development in project management course in building engineering education FT-UNP]. Educational Building Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan Dan Sipil, 5(1JUNI), 26–31.

  13. Nisrokha, N. (2015). Teknik Mengembangkan Modul Mata Kuliah Sejarah Pendidikan Islam [Techniques for developing Islamic education history course modules]. Madaniyah, 5(2), 296–308.

  14. Oktaviana, I., Sumitro, S. B., & Lestari, U. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Penelitian Karakterisasi Protein Membran Sperma pada Matakuliah Bioteknologi [Development of teaching materials on research on characterization of sperm membrane proteins in biotechnology course]. Florea: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 2(2).

  15. Perwitasari, S., & Wahjoedi, W. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik Berbasis Kontekstual [Development of contextual-based thematic teching materials]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(3), 278–285.

  16. Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The Effectiveness of STEM-Based on Gender Differences: The Impact of Physics Concept Understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753–761.

  17. Sari, N. K., & Anantyarta, P. (2018). Pengembangan Petunjuk Praktikum Histologi Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi [Development of histology practicum instructions for biology education study program]. BIOMA: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 3(2).

  18. Sipayung, T. N., & Simanjuntak, S. D. (2017). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dengan Menggunakan Modul [The effectiveness of cooperative learning using modules]. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 393–398.

  19. Sukiminiandari, Y. P., Budi, A. S., & Supriyati, Y. (2015). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran fisika denganpendekatan saintifik [Development of physics learning module with scientific approach]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (e-Journal), 4, SNF2015-II.

  20. Vahlia, I., Rahmawati, D., Mustika, M., Yunarti, T., & Nurhanurawati, N. (2021). ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR ALJABAR LINEAR BAGI MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA [Analysis of needs for the development of linear algebra teaching materials for mathematics education students]. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 1182–1189.

  21. Yunarti, T. (2016). Metode Socrates Dalam Pembelajaran Berpikir Kritis [Socrates medthod in critical thinking study]. Graha Ilmu.