A Ghanaian Study on Multiple Intelligences of Pre-Service Science Teachers in Selected Colleges of Education
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 18 January 2022

A Ghanaian Study on Multiple Intelligences of Pre-Service Science Teachers in Selected Colleges of Education

George Brains Budu, Judith Kafui Kemetse, Kwaku Darko Amponsah

Peki College of Education (Ghana), E. P. College of Education (Ghana), University of Ghana (Ghana)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.01.414

Pages: 15-27

Keywords: Academic Performance, Intelligent Quotient (IQ), Multiple Intelligence (MI), Multiple Intelligence Strategy, Pre-Service Science Teachers

Abstract

The Multiple Intelligence (MI) Theory has been recognised for its significance in education. This study aimed to provide a detailed examination of each intelligence and illustrate how different MIs work. The current study seeks to discover and link pre-service science teachers' numerous intellectual domains and learning style profiles. The survey method was used for the study, which included 150 pre-service science teachers. The “multiple intelligence domains inventory for educators” was utilised to collect data for the study. According to the findings, the use of MIs in science teaching is rarely mentioned, with the features of each intelligence in the context of the various science teaching methodologies. Further, the results indicated that the intelligences mentioned by Gardner could be found in the pre-service teachers in beginning their teaching. Logical-Mathematics was highly advanced among pre-service science teachers with the musical intelligence being the lowest. Gender differences were also found to exist between males and females in only two of the eight MIs, specifically, Logical-Mathematics and Visual-Spatial, which was also significant.

References

  1. Agarwal, S. (2017). A comparative study of multiple intelligence among male and female students of class XI. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education & Technology (IJARET), 4(1), 82-85.

  2. Al-Faoury, H. O. &Smadi, M. O. (2015). The effect of an integrative skills program on developing Jordanian university students’ select multiple intelligences. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(1), 38. DOI: 10.17507/tpls.0501.05.

  3. Amponsah, K. D. (2020). South African twelfth grade students’ conceptions regarding electrochemistry. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(3), 363-369.

  4. Amponsah, K. D., Boateng, F. K., & Mohammed, S. M. (2021). Pre-Service science teachers’ conceptual understandings of electrochemistry at the university of Ghana. African Journal of Chemical Education (AJCE) 11(2), 129-147

  5. Amponsah, K. D., Bukari, Z., Asano, R., Boateng, F. K., & Darkwa, S. A. (2021). Impact of Multiple Intelligence (MI) on Science Process Skills (SPS) among Senior High School Students. Social Science learning Education Journal 6(8), 533-545.

  6. Amponsah, K. D., Kotoka, J. K., Beccles, C., & Dlamini, S. N. (2018). Effectiveness of  Collaboration on Low and High Achieving School Students’ Comprehension of Electrochemistry in South Africa. European Journal of STEM Education, `3(2), 1-15.

  7. Amponsah, K. D. & Ochonogor, C. E. (2018). Facilitating Conceptual Change in Students' Comprehension of Electrochemistry Concepts through Collaborative Teaching Strategy. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(6): 596-601.

  8. Amponsah, K. D. & Ochonogor, C. E. (2016a). Gender differences in constructivist approach to high school learners’ comprehension of electrochemistry concepts. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 4, 220-231. Retrieved October 12, 2021 from  http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/334051

  9. Amponsah, K. D. & Ochonogor, C. E. (2016b). Impact of a constructivist approach to learning on high achieving students’ comprehension of electrochemistry concepts. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 4, 210-221. Retrieved October 12, 2021 from http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/334053.

  10. Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.

  11. Cheng, H. Y., Hou, Y. J., Hou, Y. A., & Chung, W. Y. (2010). Gender differences in multiple intelligences, learning behavior and English performance: a case study in Taiwan. International Journal of the Humanities, 8(2).

  12. Education, UNICEF Ghana. (2015). Retrieved October 12, 2021 from https://www.unicef.org/ghana/education#

  13. Emendu, N. B, & Udogu, M. (2013). Effect of Multiple Intelligences Teaching Strategies on Student’s Achievement and Retention in Chemistry. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 2, 30-34.

  14. Fitzgibbons, L. (2019, July 10). What is spatial intelligence? Definition from WhatIs.com. WhatIs.com. https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/spatial-intelligence

  15. Gardner, H. E. (2000). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Hachette UK.

  16. Gardner, H. (2011a). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Hachette Uk.

  17. Gardner, H. (2013). Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences- educational Leadership http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept97/vol55/num01/Integrating-Learning-Styles-and-Multiple Intelligences.aspx

  18. Ihudiebube-Splendor, C. N., & Chikeme, P. C. (2020). A descriptive cross-sectional study: Practical and feasible design in investigating health care–seeking behaviors of undergraduates.In SAGE Research Methods Cases. Retrieved October 12, 2021 from https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781529742862

  19. Kaur, M. (2014). Gender differences in Multiple Intelligences with respect to grade level. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 8(2), 117-120.

  20. Kelly, M. (n.d.). Spatial intelligence and its importance in education. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/spatial-intelligence-profile-8096

  21. King, E. M. (2011, January). Education is fundamental to development and growth: Keynote address at education world forum. In The World Bank, QE2 Conference Center, London.

  22. Linguistic intelligence and its benefits. (n.d.). Mind movies blog. https://www.mindmovies.com/blogroll/linguistic-intelligence-and-its-benefits

  23. Logsdon, A. (2021, July 26). What makes logical-mathematical learners unique. https://www.verywellfamily.com/mathematical-logical-learners-2162782

  24. Loori, Ali. (2005). Multiple intelligences: A comparative study between the preferences of males and females. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 33, 77-88. 10.2224/sbp.2005.33.1.77.

  25. Marenus, M. (2020, June 9). Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences.  https://www.simplypsychology.org/multiple- intelligences.html

  26. MentalUP Educational Games. (2019, December 12). Logical mathematical intelligence:  Examples, activities and careers | MentalUP. MentalUP.co. https://www.mentalup.co/blog/logical-mathematical-intelligence

  27. Morgan, H. (2014). Maximizing student success with differentiated learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(1), 34-38.

  28. Mpho, O. M. (2018). Teacher centered dominated approaches: Their implications for todays inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 10(2), 11-21.

  29. Multiple Intelligences (Howard Gardner)- InstructionalDesign.org http://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/multiple-intelligences/

  30. Ponsford, K. & Lapadat, J. (2001). Academically capable students who are failing in high school: perceptions about achievement. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 35, 137-156.

  31. Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of multiple intelligences-based teaching strategy in enhancing the multiple intelligences and Science Process Skills of junior high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 122-135.https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.404

  32. Xu, J. (2020). Identifying Students’ Self-Perceived Multiple Intelligence Preferences: The Case of Students from Heilongjiang International University, China. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 11.

  33. Yalmanci, S. G., Gozum, A. C. (2013). The effects of multiple intelligence theory-based  teaching on students’ achievement and retention of knowledge (Example of the enzymes subject). International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(3), 27-36.

  34. Zainudin, E. F. (2012). Malaysian teachers’ and students’ perceptions of students’ Multiple Intelligence profiles in Malaysian secondary schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).

  35. Zare-ee, A., Mohd Don, Z., Knowles, G., & Tohidian, I. (2015). Gender differences in self-estimates of multiple intelligences among learners of English. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 2(4), 249-264.

bottom of page