An Analysis of Social Studies Teachers' Opinions on Distance Education After Covid-19 Pandemic
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 08 February 2023

An Analysis of Social Studies Teachers' Opinions on Distance Education After Covid-19 Pandemic

Murat Tartuk

İstanbul University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.06.01.699

Pages: 198-213

Keywords: Covid-19, Distance Education, Social Studies, Teachers' Opinions

Abstract

Distance education offers an important teaching method in our age thanks to the development and widespread use of digital technologies. Distance education has been used especially during the Covid-19 pandemic in recent years and has significantly shaped education and training activities since then. This study aims to examine the opinions of social studies teachers on distance education. The study addresses the effect of distance education on teaching from various aspects. The study was designed as a case study, one of the qualitative research designs. The data were obtained using a semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher. The study group consisted of 10 social studies teachers working in different provinces of Turkey. According to the results of the study, teachers evaluated distance education as different from face-to-face education in 5 different categories. These are physical, social, time and space, material use and difference in skills training. According to the teachers, classroom management is artificially easier in distance education. They evaluated distance education as unfavorable in terms of communication. Teachers reported that the use of materials is more advantageous in distance education and that these materials are mostly digital materials. These teachers alsobelieve that distance education decreases student success, face-to-face education is the most appropriate method for learning activities, and distance education should be used merely as a supportive element for face-to-face education.

References

  1. Adıgüzel, A. (2020). Salgın sürecinde uzaktan eğitim ve öğrenci başarısını değerlendirmeye ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers' views on distance education and evaluating student success during the epidemic process]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 253-271. doi: 10.37669 / milliegitim.781998

  2. Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the Covıd-19 Pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45-51. http://www.doi.org/10.33902/JPSP. 2020261309

  3. Agnoletto, R., & Queiroz, V. (2020). COVID-19 and the challenges in Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340385425_COVID 19_and_the_challenges_in_Education

  4. Alharthi, M. (2020). Students’ attitudes toward the use of technology in online courses. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 3(1), 14-23.

  5. Arat, T., & Bakan, Ö. (2011). Uzaktan eğitim ve uygulamaları [Distance education and its applications]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 14(1-2), 363-374.

  6. Ardıç, E., & Altun, A. (2017). Dijital çağın öğreneni [The learner of the digital age]. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgilerde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 1, 12-30.

  7. Bakioğlu, B., & Çevik, M. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisi sürecinde fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitime ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of science teachers on distance education during the Covid-19 pandemic]. Electronic Turkish Studies, 15(4), 109-129. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.43502

  8. Başaran, M., Doğan, E., Karaoğlu, E., & Şahin, E. (2020). Koronavirüs (Covıd-19) pandemi sürecinin getirisi olan uzaktan eğitimin etkililiği üzerine bir çalışma [A study on the effectiveness of distance education, which is the result of the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic process]. Acedemia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi (AJER), 5(2), 368-397.

  9. Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions - A literature review. Sage Open, 6(1), 1-11.

  10. Burke, J., & Dempsey, M. (2020). COVID-19 Practice in primaryscholls in Ireland Report. National University of Ireland Maynooth, Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.into.ie/app/uploads/2020/04/Covid-19-Practice-in-Primary-Schools-Report-1.pdf

  11. Creswell, J. W. (2019). Nitel araştırmacılar için 30 temel beceri [30 essential skills for the Qualitative researcher]  (H. Özcan, Translation). Ankara: Anı.

  12. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri – Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni [Qualıtatıve ınquıry – research desıgn – Choosing among five approaches] (M. Bütün, & S. B. Demir, Translation). Ankara: Siyasal.

  13. Demir, F., & Özdaş, F. (2020). Covid-19 sürecindeki uzaktan eğitime ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Examination of teachers' opinions on distance education in the Covid-19 process]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 273-292.

  14. Dinçer, S. (2016). Bilgisayar destekli eğitim ve uzaktan eğitime genel bir bakış [An overview of computer assisted education and distance education]. Adana, Seyhan, Türkiye.

  15. Emin, M. N. (2020). Koronavirüs salgını ve acil durumda eğitim [The coronavirus epidemic and education in an emergency]. Seta Perspektif, 268, 1-4.

  16. Hebebci, M. T., Bertiz, Y., & Alan, S. (2020). Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(4), 267-282.

  17. Holmberg, B. (1995). Theory and practice of distance education (Second edition). London:
    Routledge.

  18. İşman, A. (2011). Uzaktan eğitim [Distance education]. Ankara: Pegem.

  19. Kaya, Z. (2002). Uzaktan eğitim [Distance education]. Ankara: Pegem.

  20. Kırıkçı, A. C., Arıkan, İ., & Çetin, G. (2022). Sosyal bilgiler dersine giren öğretmenlerin uzaktan eğitime yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi [An ınvestıgatıon on the vıews of teachers about dıstance educatıon ın socıal studıes course]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(234), 1683-1708.

  21. Kırık, A. M. (2014). Uzaktan Eğitimin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Türkiye’deki Durumu [Historical development of distance education and the situation in Turkey]. Marmara İletişim Dergisi / Marmara University Journal of Communication, 73-94, 21.

  22. Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2022). Milli Eğitim İstatistikleri Örgün Eğitim [National education statistics formal education]. Retrieved from https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/www/icerik_goruntule.php?KNO=460

  23. Mulenga, E. M., & Marban, J. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the gateway for dijital learning in mathematics education? Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep269.

  24. Özdoğan, A. Ç., & Berkant, H. G. (2020). Covid-19 pandemi dönemindeki uzaktan eğitime ilişkin paydaş görüşlerinin incelenmesi [The examınatıon of stakeholders’ opınıons on dıstance educatıon durıng the covıd-19 epıdemıc]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 13-43.

  25. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  26. Pregowska, A., Masztalerz, K., Garlinska, M., & Osial, M. A. (2021). Worldwide journey through distance education – from the post office to virtual, augmented and mixed realities, and education during the covıd-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030118

  27. Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).

  28. Uçar, H. (2016). Uzaktan eğitimde motivasyon stratejilerinin öğrenenlerin ilgileri, motivasyonları, eylem yeterlikleri ve başarıları üzerine etkisi [The effect of motivational strategies in distance education on learners' interests, motivations, action competencies and achievements] (Doctoral Thesis). Retrieved from the National Thesis Center of the Council of Higher Education. (Thesis No. 432497)

  29. UNESCO. (2022). UNESCO’S education response to COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/education-response/initiatives

  30. Uşun, S. (2006). Uzaktan Eğitim [Distance education]. Ankara: Nobel.

  31. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Editions Seçkin.

  32. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and method(4th. ed). Sage

  33. WHO. (2022). WHO’s Response to Covıd-19, 2022 Mid-Year Report. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-s-response-to-covid-19-2022-mid-year-report

  34. WHO. (2020). WHO director-general's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

  35. Zhong, R. (2022). The Coronavirus Exposes Educati­on’s Digital Divide. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/technology/china-schools-coronavirus.html

bottom of page