Education Quarterly Reviews
Published: 01 June 2021
Applying Universal Design for Learning to Center for English as a Second Language
Karwan Kakabra Kakamad, Zana Hasan Babakr, Pakstan Faiq Mohamedami
Download Full-Text Pdf
Keywords: ESL, UDL, English Language Learning
This paper investigated the possibility of applying Universal Design for English Language Learning. Throughout the paper, both quantitative and qualitative methods were used for data collection. The students were first asked to critique the ESL program using a methodology created by Paulo Freire to ascertain how much freedom students have in creating their learning environments and establishing their own learning goals and objectives. The results showed that the majority of students rated the ESL program very low regarding their ability to influence the program's curriculum materials or learning outcomes. Moreover, the research shows that the majority of students did not believe they were adequately prepared for graduate-level studies in the University upon completion of the ESL program. As a result of these findings, several recommendations are made about creating more opportunities for individual students to use UDL principles to control their learning environments and establish their own learning goals and objectives.
Berquist, E. (2014). Crosswalk between Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and the Danielson Framework for Teaching (FfT) Retrieved from: http://www.udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/FFT_UDL_Crosswalk_HYPERLINK "http://www.udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/FFT_UDL_Crosswalk_20141115.pdf"20141115HYPERLINK "http://www.udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/FFT_UDL_Crosswalk_20141115.pdf".pdf
Britt, M., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485-522
Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., & Yardley, L. E. (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. American Psychological Association.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education : An introduction to the philosophy of education. (n.d.).
Decoste(2014).Universal design of learning http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/hiat-tech/tp://
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continum.
Krashen, S. (1998). Total physical response.
Meo, G. (2008). Curriculum planning for all learners: Applying universal design for learning (UDL) to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth,52(2), 21-30.
Rose, D.H & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. ASCD, 4.cfm"http://www.cast.org/teachingeverystudent/ideas/tes/chapterHYPERLINK "http://www.cast.org/teachingeverystudent/ideas/tes/chapter4.cfm"4HYPERLINK "http://www.cast.org/teachingeverystudent/ideas/tes/chapter4.cfm".cfm
Strobel, W., Arthanat, S., Bauer, S., & Flagg, J. (2007). Universal Design for Learning: Critical Need Areas for People with Learning Disabilities. Assistive technology outcomes and benefits, 4(1), 81-98.