Designing Number-Based Word Synonyms (NBWS) Game as a Learning Technique
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 29 March 2019

Designing Number-Based Word Synonyms (NBWS) Game as a Learning Technique

Riyanto

Bengkulu University, Indonesia

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.02.01.56

​

​

Abstract

Mathematics and Indonesian Language are subjects that are considered difficult by students in Indonesia. In addition, students are also considered less creative. One way to solve this problem is to apply the game in learning. For this reason, a game that can solve the problem needs to be designed. The game that is hypothesized to improve math, language, and creativity is Number-Based Word Synonyms (NBWS). The purpose of this paper is to present the design NBWS game, which consists of ten levels.

References

  1. AECT Task Force. (1994). The definition of educational technology. Washington, DC: AECT.

  2. Anthony, E.M. (1963). Approach, method, and technique. ELT Journal, XVII(2), 63-67.

  3. Barth, J. L. (1990). Methods of instruction in social studies education. Maryland: University Press of America.

  4. Clawson, M. (2002). Play of language: Minority children in an early childhood setting. In  J. L. Roopnarine (Ed.), Conceptual, social-cognitive, and contextual issues in the fields of play (pp. 93-116). Westport, CT: Ablex.

  5. Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., & Weissberg, R. P. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educator. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  6. Gerlach, V. S., & Elly, D. P. (1980). Teaching and media: A Systematic approach (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

  7. Ginnis, P. (2008). Trik dan taktik mengajar: Strategi meningkatkan pengajaran di kelas. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

  8. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russel, J. D. (1993).  Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

  9. Holmes, R., & Geiger, C. (2002). The relationship between creativity and cognitive abilities in preschoolers. In J. L. Roopnarine (Ed.), Conceptual, social-cognitive, and contextual issues in the fields of play (pp. 127-148). Westport, CT: Ablex.

  10. Indonesia-PISA. (2015). Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/ 174691483501965340.

  11. Info Ebtanas. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.websamba.com/infoebtanas.

  12. Jensen, E. (1999). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  13. Jensen, E. (2000). Moving with the brain in mind. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 34-37.

  14. Kompas. (2017, Agustus 16). Akses mutu tak seiring: Lingkungan pembelajaran belum berorientasi kualitas. Kompas, p. 4.

  15. Lieberman, J. N. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. New York: Academic Press.

  16. McCune, L., & Zanes, M. (2001). Learning, attention, and play. In S. Golbeck (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on early childhood education (pp. 92-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  17. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011: International Results in Mathematics. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Student Center.  Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/international-results.

  18. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015: International Results in Mathematics. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Student Center. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results.

  19. NCED. (2004). Highlights From the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003. December 2004.

  20. Rakyat Bengkulu. (2017, Mei 15). Nilai UN belasan ribu peserta UN SM Bengkulu di bawah standar. Rakyat Bengkulu, p.  4.

  21. Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wetzel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming,  23(3), 261-276.

  22. Rangking Indonesia dalam PISA. (2013). Retrieved from Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.

  23. Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microwords, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(2), 43-58.

  24. Riyanto. (2010). Keindahan Matematika. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  25. Sapari, A.  (2000, September 20).  Pembelajaran yang menyenangkan.  Kompas, p. 6.

  26. Suara Pembaharuan. (2017, Mei 6).  Nilai UN belasan ribu peserta UN SM Bengkulu di bawah standar. Suara Pembaharuan, p. 6.

  27. Tabri, M. (2017). Hasil UN 2017 turun 12 persen.  Retrieved from http://metrojambi.com/ edisi-rabu-3-mei-2017 

bottom of page