Effective Leadership in Decision Making and Mediation in the Relationship Between Educators and Parents: A Case Study of Primary Schools in Western Macedonia, Greece
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 20 May 2023

Effective Leadership in Decision Making and Mediation in the Relationship Between Educators and Parents: A Case Study of Primary Schools in Western Macedonia, Greece

Charisopoulou Marina

School Counselor in Primary Education of Kozani District Unit

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.06.02.746

Pages: 150-161

Keywords: Effective Leadership, Decision Making, Mediation, Teachers, Parents

Abstract

The quality of leadership exercised within the educational unit is paramount to developing an effective school and enhancing student achievement. The purpose of this paper is to investigate effective leadership in decision-making and mediation in the relationship between teachers and parents in a specific region in Greece. The method of quantitative research with sampling was chosen. The research instrument used was a specially designed questionnaire whose questions were based on other research with similar thematic content. Data entry, processing and analysis were performed using the statistical program IBMStatisticsSPSSversion 21. As for its results, there are two important characteristics that a principal must possess for the effectiveness of his/her interventions in the role of mediator. These characteristics included the participation of parents and teachers in problem solving and the individual briefing and action of the director in order to effectively mediate in the restoration of relationships. What emerged from the factor analysis conducted to highlight the main characteristics that a principal should have in the role of mediator was cooperation, organization, the use of body language, practical applications, character potential, ethics, training and information. Among others, the paper concluded that the principals who take on the role of mediator perceive that their role has a positive response and is efficient for both parents and teachers. On the contrary, deputy principals and teachers who are receivers of the role and not actors, perceive that the response is not positive and the role of the principal does not promote efficiency.

References

  1. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8thedn.). NewJersey: Pearson.

  2. Henkin A.B., & Holliman S.L., (2009). Urban teacher commitment: Exploring associations with organizational conflicts, support for innovation and participation, Urban Education, 44(2): 160 – 180.

  3. Misla V., (2012). Conflict Management and School Leadership, J Communication, 3(1): 25 – 34.

  4. Davies L., (2021). The Edge of Chaos: Explorations in Education and Conflict, Third International Handbook of Globalisation, Education & Policy Reseach, 339 – 351.

  5. Kruger J., & Michalek R., (2011). Parents’ and Teachers’ Cooperation: Mutual Expectations and Attributions from a Parents’ Point of View, International Journal about Parents in Education, 5(2): 1-11.

  6. Sheridan S., Witte A., Holmes S., Coutts M., Dent A., Kunz G., & Wu C., (2017). A randomized trial examining the effects of Conjoint Behavioral Consultation in rural schools: Student outcomes and the mediating role of the teacher–parent relationship, Journal of School Psychology, (61): 33 – 53.

  7. Sani S., (2015). The Role of Intercultural Mediation in the Integration of Foreign Students, Procedia – Social & Behavioral Sciences, (191): 2582 – 2584.

  8. Σταμάτης, Π. (2005). Παιδαγωγική μη λεκτική επικοινωνία. Αθήνα: Ατραπός. (Stamatis, P. (2005). Pedagogical non-verbal communication. Athens: Atrapos)

  9. Πασιαρδής, Π.(2004). Εκπαιδευτική ηγεσία: Από την περίοδο της ευμενούς αδιαφορίας στη σύγχρονη εποχή. Αθήνα, Μεταίχμιο. (Pasiardis, P. (2004). Educational Leadership: From the Period of Favorably Indifference to the Modern Era. Athens: Metaichmio.)

  10. Σαΐτης, Χ. Α. (2002). Ο Διευθυντής στο Σύγχρονο Σχολείο. Αθήνα: Έκδοση Ιδίου. (Saitis, Ch. Α. (2002). The Principal in the Modern School. Athens: Personal Publication.)

  11. Σαΐτης, Χ. Α. (2001). Η Λειτουργία του Σχολείου μέσα από τις Αποφάσεις του Συλλόγου Διδασκόντων. Αθήνα: Ατραπός. (Saitis, Ch. Α. (2001). The Operation of School through the Decisions of the Teachers' Association. Athens: Atrapos.)

  12. Στραβάκου, Π. (2003). Ο διευθυντής της σχολικής μονάδας πρωτοβάθμιας και δευτεροβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης. Θεσσαλονίκη: Αφοί Κυριακίδη.( Stravakou, P. (2003). The principal of the primary and secondary school unit. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis Bros.)

  13. Νόβα-Καλτσούνη, Χ.( 2004). Συνεργασία σχολείου οικογένειας: δυνατότητες και περιορισμοί, Επιστήμες Αγωγής, 4, 21-33. (Nova-Kaltsouni, C. (2004). School-family cooperation: potentials and limitations, Education Sciences, 4, 21-33.)

  14. Ματσαγγούρας, Η. & Βέρδης, Α. (2003). Γονείς εταίροι στην εκπαίδευση: απόψεις Ελλήνων γονέων υπό τη σύγχρονη προβληματική, Επιστημονικό Βήμα, 2, 5-23. (Matsangouras, I. & Verdi, A. (2003). Parents partners in education: views of Greek parents under the contemporary reasoning, Scientific Rostrum, 2, 5-23.)

  15. Θάνος, Θ. Β. (2017). Σχολική Διαμεσολάβηση. Θεωρία, Εφαρμογή, Αξιολόγηση. Θεσσαλονίκη: Κυριακίδης. (Thanos, T. B. (2017). School Mediation. Theory, Implementation, Evaluation. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis.)

  16. Martin, O. (2008). Η ανάλυση Ποσοτικών Δεδομένων. Αθήνα: Εκδόσεις Τόπος. (Martin, O. (2008). The Analysis of Quantitative Data. Athens: Topos Publications.)

  17. Davies L., (2021). The Edge of Chaos: Explorations in Education and Conflict, Third International Handbook of Globalisation, Education & Policy Reseach, 339 – 351.

  18. Τριαντάρη, Σ. (2020c). Ηγεσία – Θεωρίες Ηγεσίας: Από τον αριστοτελικό Ρήτορα στον σύγχρονο Ηγέτη, Εκδόσεις: Κ. & Μ. ΣΤΑΜΟΥΛΗ, Θεσσαλονίκη. (Triantari, S. (2020c). Leadership - Theories of Leadership: From the Aristotelian Rhetor to the modern Leader, Publications: K. & M. STAMOULI, Thessaloniki.)

  19. Τριαντάρη, Σ. (2020b). Ηθική και Κοινωνική Φιλοσοφία της Επικοινωνίας: Στρατηγικές και Τεχνικές της Επικοινωνίας, Εκδόσεις: Κ & Μ Σταμούλη, Θεσσαλονίκη. (Triantari, S. (2020b). Ethics and Social Philosophy of Communication: Strategies and Techniques of Communication, Publishers: K & M Stamouli, Thessaloniki.)

  20. Τζώτζου, Μ. & Αναστασόπουλος, Μ. (2013). Νέο Σχολείο: Μορφές Επικοινωνίας και ο Επικοινωνιακός Ρόλος του Διευθυντή της Σχολικής Μονάδας. 16οΔιεθνές Συνέδριο – Πάτρα, 239-251. (Tzotzou, M. & Anastasopoulos, M. (2013): Forms of Communication and the Communicative Role of the School Unit Principal. 16th International Conference - Patras, 239-251.)

bottom of page