top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
open access

Published: 30 April 2021

Experiences of Turkish Middle School Science Teachers’ First Science Fair Projects Coordination

Arzu Kucuk

Ministry of National Education, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 497-512

Keywords: Science Fair Project, Science Education, Informal Learning, Project-Based Learning, Teachers’ Experiences


This study aimed to reveal the experiences of science teachers conducting a science fair project for the first time. The research used quantitative data based on an online assessment survey for science fair projects. There are twenty-one questions (one of them is open-ended, the others are Likert type) developed by the researcher. The questionnaire was shared with science teachers on the science fair, 4006 science fairs, Tübitak science fairs themed social media pages between June and October 2018. 244 coordinator science teachers marked the survey. The data obtained from the questionnaire was presented in a tabular form by deducting % and frequencies. On the other hand, the last open-ended questions were analyzed by using content analysis. Based on these results, science teachers, who carried out the fair coordinator for the first time and to be able to do it again have some expectations of practicing positive experiences such as the students should gain scientific skills, the fair should be carried out in cooperation, the responsibilities were shared in a balanced way in the school, the school administrators should both support and help the process, the advisors should take ownership of the job, be appreciated by stakeholders with awards, etc. However, this first experience posed a sufficiently unexpected result at least for some of them.


  1. AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.

  3. Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education (7 ed.). Canada: Thomson Wadsworth.

  4. Atalmış, E. H., Selçuk, G., & Ataç, A. (2018). Manager, coordinator and student views about TUBITAK 4006 projects. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 19(3), 1999-2020. doi: 10.29299/kefad.2018.19.03.006

  5. Avcı, E., & Özenir Su, Ö. (2018). Evaluation of science fair process from project coordinator teachers’ point of view. Elementary Education Online, 17(3), 1672-1690. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466417

  6. Balcı, E. (2019). Assessment of TUBITAK 4006 science fair: Polatlı sample(Unpublished master thesis). Bolu: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University.

  7. Barbour, R. S. (2014). Mixing qualitative methods: Quality Assurance or qualitative quagmire? Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 352-361.

  8. Benzer, S., & Evrensel, E. (2019). Students’ views about TUBİTAK 4006 science fair. Journal of Steam Education, 2(2), 28-38.

  9. Bozdemir, E. (2018). Assessment of the effectiveness of the projects made at TUBİTAK science fairs on the students  (Unpublished master thesis). Çanakkale: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

  10. Bulunuz, M., Tapan-Broutin, M. S., & Bulunuz, N. (2016). Pre-service teacher scientific behavior: a comparative study of paired science project assignments. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research(62), 195-218. doi:10.14689/ejer.2016.62.12

  11. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  12. Council, N. R. (2012). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press.

  13. Cresswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). Sage.

  14. Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337–357.

  15. Çavuş, R., Balçın, M. D., & Yılmaz, M. M. (2018). The impact of science fair activities on secondary school students' science skills and problem-solving skills perceptions. Inonu University Journal of the Graduate School of Education, 5(10), 1-17. doi:10.29129/indulge.395132

  16. Çiğdemoğlu, C., Tekeli, A., & Köseoğlu, F. (2019). The impacts of a teacher who received mentorship support from a teacher professional development program for informal learning on students' reflections-a case study. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(5), 2311-2330. doi:10.24106/ kefdergi.3521

  17. Çolakoğlu, M. H. (2018). The contribution of TUBİTAK 4006 science fairs towards education and training. Journal of STEAM Education, 1(1), 48-63.

  18. DeClue, M. E., Johnson, K., Hendrickson, H., & Keck, P. (2000). Stimulate high school science fair participation by connecting with a nearby college. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(5), 608.

  19. Dede, A. (2019). Evaluation of 4006 TUBİTAK science fairs for science teachers (Unpublished master thesis). Rize: Recep Tayyip Erdogan University.

  20. Doğan, S. (2020). Do Tubitak-4006 science fairs achieve its objectives? the viewpoints of school administrators and teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 26-41. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.3

  21. Ebbel, E. (2010). Learning science from scientists. NSTA Reports, 21(8), 10-11.

  22. Fadel, C., & Trilling, B. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  23. Haysom, J. (2013). Science fair warm-up “Learning the practice of scientists-Teachers Guide. Virginia: NSTA Press.

  24. Jaworski, B. A. (2013). The effects of science fairs on students’ knowledge of scientific inquiry and interest in science (Unpublished master thesis). Montana: Montana State University.

  25. Kahraman, Ü. (2019). TUBİTAK 4006 science fair has an effect on scientist image of students (Unpublished master thesis). Ağrı: Agrı Ibrahim Çecen University.

  26. Kaya, E., & Yıldırım, A. (2014). Science Anxiety among failing students. Elementary Education Online, 13(2), 518-525.

  27. Kececi, G. (2017). The aims and learning attainments of secondary and high school students attending science festivals: A case study. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(23), 1146-1153.

  28. Keçeci, G., Kırbağ- Zengin, F., & Alan, B. (2018). Comparing the science festival attitudes of students participating as observers in school science fairs. Acta Didactica Napocensia(11), 175-183.

  29. Keskin, D. (2019). The effect of science fairs on science process skills, motivation and anxiety levels of secondary school students (Unpublished master thesis).Denizli: Pamukkale University.

  30. Küçük, A., & Yıldırım, N. (2019). Nature education and nature schools. In A. İ. Sen (Eds.), Out-of-School Learning Environments (pp. 246-272). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  31. Küçük, A., & Yıldırım, N. (2020). The effect of out-of-school learning activities on 5th grade students’ science, technology, society and environment views. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 9(1), 37-63.

  32. Küçük, M. (2006).  A study toward teaching the nature of science for seventh grade primary students (Unpublished PhD thesis).Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik University.

  33. Küçük, M., & Küçük, A. (2017). A study on the project self-efficacy of TUBİTAK 4006- science fair project coordinators. IV. International Eurasian Educational Research Congress. Antalya.

  34. Lu, C.-C. (2013). Explore Elementary teachers' professional knowledge of guiding science fair product by using different ınstruction model. US-China Education Review A, 3(2), 92-99.

  35. Maarschalk, J. (1988). Scientific literacy and informal science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(2), 135– 146.

  36. McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 10-16.

  37. MEB. (2008). Teacher competencies; general and special field competencies for teaching profession. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Genel Müdürlüğü.

  38. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A Guide to design and ımplementation(4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

  39. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. Thousands of Oaks: Sage Publications.

  40. Ndlovu, M. (2013). Science fair learners' evaluation of theır experience of scientific investigations in the classroom and during their project work. 6th International Conference on Education, Research and Innovation, Seville.

  41. Okuyucu, M. A. (2019). Teacher and student opinions concerning 4006-TUBITAK science fair. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 5(2), 202-218.

  42. Olive, S. M. (2017). The value of science fair and the factors that have led to the decline in Ohio science fair competition (Unpublished ph.d. thesis). Ohio: Youngstown State Unıversity.

  43. Özdemir, B. B., & Babaoğlan, B. (2019). The scientific process skills of the 6th grade students of TUBITAK 4006 science fairs and their relationship with the attitudes towards science course. Journal of Research in Informal Environments, 4(1), 22-36.

  44. Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92, 868-908.

  45. Schmidt, K. M., & Kelter, P. (2017). Science fairs: A qualitative study of their impact on student science inquiry learning and attitudes toward the stem. Science Educator, 25(2), 126-132.

  46. Selçuk, G., Atalmış, E. H., & Ataç, A. (2020). 4006 TUBITAK science fairs effectiveness according to teachers and students: Validity and reliability study. Kahramanmaras Sütcü Imam Uviversity Journal of Social Sciences, 17(2), 750-774. doi:10.33437/ksusbd.770025

  47. Sontay, G., Anar, F., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2019). Opinions of secondary school students attending 4006-TUBİTAK science fair about science fair. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 3(5), 16-28.

  48. Soyuçok, H. (2018). Views of different participants in studies about science projects prepared in scope of tubitak 4006 scientific fairs (Unpublished master thesis). Ağrı: Agrı Ibrahim Çecen University.

  49. Şahin, E., & Önder-Çelikkanlı, N. (2014). The impacts of a secondary school science exhibition on the students in charge. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(2), 71-97. doi: 10.17522/nefefmed.57100

  50. Tortop, H. S. (2013). Science teachers' views about the science fair at the primary education level. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 56-64.

  51. Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods. West Sussex: Wiley-Black Well.

  52. Tucker, M., Darling-Hammond, L., & Jackson, J. (2013). Note to congress: Fewer, better tests can boost student achievement. Education Week, 33(7), 24.

  53. Tur, S. (2020). Teachers' views on TUBİTAK 4006 projects (Denizli Pamukkale sample) (Unpublished master thesis project). Denizli: Pamukkale University.

  54. Türkmen, H. (2019). The Impact of science fairs on adults' scientific perceptions & scientific epistemological beliefs. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(3), 22-32.

  55. Wilson, J. D., Cordry, S., & Unline, C. (2004). Science fairs: Promoting positive attitudes towards science from student participation. College Student Journal, 38(1), 112-116.

  56. Wren, K. (2015). Rush Holt wants everyone to think like a scientist. Science, 1430-1431.

  57. Yasar, S., & Baker, D. (2003). The impact of involvement in a science fair on seventh-grade students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (Philadelphia, PA, March 23- 26, 2003) .

  58. Yavuz, S., Büyükekşi, C., & Işık-Büyükekşi, S. (2014). The effect of science festival on scientific beliefs. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 168-174.

  59. Yıldırım, H. İ. (2018). The effect of science fairs on the 6th grade students’ problem solving skills. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2), 390-409. doi: 10.24315/trkefd.364050

  60. Yıldırım, H. İ. (2020). The views of students participating in science fairs with their projects and advisory teachers on science fair. e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 28-51. doi:10.30900/kafkasegt.677181

  61. Yıldırım, H. İ., & Şensoy, Ö. (2016). The effect of science fairs on the 6th grade students’ attitude towards the science course. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 14(1), 23-40.

bottom of page