Gender and Socio-Economic Background Aspect of Inclusion: A Perspective from Turkey
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 30 November 2022

Gender and Socio-Economic Background Aspect of Inclusion: A Perspective from Turkey

Fatma Kesik

Hasan Ali Yucel Faculty of Education, Istanbul University

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.592

Pages: 297-309

Keywords: Gender, Socio-Economic Background, Inclusion, Inclusive Education

Abstract

This study aims to identify the opinions of teachers about the inclusive education policies and practices regarding the gender and socio-economic backgrounds of students. Phenomenology, as a qualitative research method was used in this study and eighteen teachers selected by criterion sampling technique constituted the sample of this study. The data of the study were collected with semi-structured interview forms and analyzed with content analysis method. As a result of the study, it was identified that although there have been tremendous improvements in ensuring the access of female students and students from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds in the education system, it is revealed that educational inequalities and injustices continue to exist and several female students and students from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds are excluded from education system due to several reasons in Turkey. In that regard, it is suggested that the policies and practices towards inclusive education should shift towards an improvement in education system with the aim of increasing inclusion, justice, equity and diversity in all spheres of educational life.

References

  1. Acarlar, F. (2013). Kaynaştırma modeli ve özel gereksinimli küçük çocukların özellikleri. [Inclusion model and characteristics of young children with special needs] In B. Sucuoğlu & H. Bakkaloğlu (Eds.), Okul öncesinde kaynaştırma (pp. 21-74). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  2. Acedo, C., Ferrer, F., & Pamies, J. (2009). Inclusive education: Open debates and the road ahead Prospects (2009) 39, 227–238.

  3. Adıgüzel, A. (2013). Kız çocuklarının okullaşma engelleri ve çözüm önerileri: Şanlıurfa Örneği.[Schooling of girl children barriers and suggestions for solution a case study of Şanlıurfa] EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 17 (56), 325-344.

  4. Ainscow, M, Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion.London: Routledge.

  5. Altan, S. (2021). Herkes için kapsayıcı eğitim. [Inclusive education for all] Eleştirel Pedagoji, 60, 27-31.

  6. Arduin, S. (2015). A review of the values that underpin the structure of an education system and its approach to disability and inclusion. Oxford Review of Education 41 (1): 105–121.

  7. Armstrong, D., Armstrong, A.C., & Spandagou, I. (2011). Inclusion: by choice or by chance? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15 (1), 29-39

  8. Arnesen, A-L., & Lundahl, L. (2006). Still social and democratic? inclusive education policies in the Nordic Welfare States. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50 (3), 285–300.

  9. Ataç, E. (2017). Reading educational inequalities in Turkey: Statistics and geographic distributions. Education and Science, 42(192), 59-86.

  10. Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). A survey into mainstream teachers' attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 191-211.

  11. Bayrakdar, İ., & Karataş, İ.H. (2016). Eğitime ilişkin sosyal politikalar konusunda okul müdürlerinin görüşleri: Göynük ilçesi örneği, [School Principals’ Opinions on Social Policies Related to Education: Case of Göynük District] Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 71-88.

  12. Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2016). Who are the most disadvantaged? Factors associated with the achievement of students with low socio-economic backgrounds. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16, 691-710.

  13. Beltekin, N. & Radmard, S. (2015). Okul çağındaki çocukların işçileşmesini etkileyen faktörler. [Factors that affecting join labor force of children in school age] YYÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 12 (1), 145-163.

  14. Bloom, B.D., & Crabtree, B.F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education 40(4), 314-321.

  15. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. CSIE.

  16. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006) Conducting in-depth interview: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International Tool Series,Monitoring and Evaluation-2.

  17. Cin, F. M. (2017). Gender justice, education and equality: Creating capabilities for girls’ and women’s development. Cham, Switzerland: Springer

  18. Coombs-Richardson, R., & Mead, J. (2001). Supporting general educators' inclusive practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 383.

  19. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014) Basics of qualitative research. 3rd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks.

  20. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

  21. Çal, F. Ö., & Karaboğa, A. B. (2017). Kız öğrencilerin ortaöğretime devamlarının önündeki engeller. [Girls’ barriers to access secondary education] Journal of Human Sciences, 14 (2), 1298-1326.

  22. Çayır, K. (2015) Citizenship, nationality and minorities in Turkey's textbooks: from politics of non-recognition to ‘difference multiculturalism’, Comparative Education, 51(4), 519-536

  23. Çelik, R. (2017). Adalet, kapsayıcılık ve eğitimde hakkaniyetli fırsat eşitliği,[ Justice, inclusiveness and fair equality of opportunity in education] Fe Dergi 9 (2), 17-29.

  24. Çolak, İ.(2020). Kadınların okulu terk etme nedenleri ve kız çocuklarının eğitimine ilişkin görüşleri [The reasons of women's school leaving and views on the education of girls] (Unpublished MA Thesis) Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat .

  25. Demirel Kaya, E. (2019). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığının temel eğitim kademesindeki dezavantajlı öğrencilere yönelik kapsayıcı eğitim politika ve uygulamaları. [Inclusive education policies and practices of the Ministry of National Education for disadvantaged students in the primary education level (2002-2018) ] (Unpublished MA thesis) Gazi University, Ankara.

  26. Dudley-Marling, C., & M.-B. Burns. 2014. “Two Perspectives on Inclusion in the United States.” Global Education Review 1: 14–31.

  27. Eğitim-Sen. (2018). 2018 yıl sonu eğitimde cinsiyetçilik raporu.[ 2018 year-end report on sexism in education] Retrieved from http://egitimsen.org.tr/2018-yil-sonu-egitimde-cinsiyetcilik-raporu/

  28. Ergün, M., & Arık, B. M. (2020). Eğitim izleme raporu 2020: Öğrenciler ve eğitime erişim. Eğitim Reformu Girişimi [Students and access to education. Education monitoring report 2020, Education Reform Initiative] Retrieved from https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/egitim-izleme-raporu-2020-ogrenciler-ve-egitime-erisim/

  29. Ergün, M. (2017). Politicizing the de-policitized: the representation of disability in Turkey’s textbooks. (Unpublished MA Thesis), Bilgi University, İstanbul.

  30. ERI [Education Reform Initiative] (2016). A situation analysis of inclusive education in secondary schools in Turkey.İstanbul: İmak Ofset Basım Yayın

  31. ERI. (2017). Bir arada yaşamı ve geleceği kapsayıcı eğitimle inşa etmek.[ To build life together and the future with inclusive education.] Retrieved from https://indd.adobe.com/view/6066c857-843a-4d49-b7e9-77f635a950cf

  32. ERI (2019). Öğrenciler ve eğitime erişim.Eğitim izleme raporu. [Students and access to education. Education monitoring report 2020, Education Reform Initiative] Retrieved from https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/yayin/egitim-izleme-raporu-2019-ogrenciler-ve-egitime-erisim/

  33. Erkılıç, M., & Durak, S. (2013). Tolerable and inclusive learning spaces: An evaluation of policies and specifications for physical environments that promote inclusion in Turkish primary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17, 462–479.

  34. Florian, L., & Rouse, M. (2009). The inclusive practice project in Scotland: Teacher education for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (2009), 594–601

  35. Go Prince (2017). Inclusive education in early childhood: Developing good practices. Retrieved from https://www.goprince.eu/

  36. Gökşen, F., Cemalcılar Z. & Gürlesel, C.F. (2005). Türkiye’de ilköğretim okullarında okulu terk ve izlenmesi ile önlenmesine yönelik politikalar. [Policies towards the following and prevention of school leaving in primary schools in Turkey]. Retrieved from http://www.acev.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/turkiyede_ilkogretim_okullarinda__okulu_terk_ve_izlenmesi_ile_onlenmesine_yonelik_politikalar.pdf

  37. Guðjónsdóttir, H., & Óskarsdóttir, E. (2016). Inclusive education, pedagogy and practice. In Science Education towards Inclusion,Silvija Markic and Simone Abels (Eds). (pp: 7–22). New York: Nova Publishers.

  38. Gumus, S., & Gumus, E. (2013). Achieving gender parity in primary school education in Turkey via the campaign called “Haydi Kızlar Okula”(Girls, Let’s Go to School). Education and Science, 38(167), 17–26.

  39. Haug, P. (2017) Understanding inclusive education: ideals and reality. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 19(3), 206-217

  40. İnce, B. (2012). Citizenship education in Turkey: Inclusive or exclusive, Oxford Review of Education, 38 (2),  115-131.

  41. Karaman, B. & Özçalık, M. (2007). Türkiye’de gelir dağılımı eşitsizliğinin bir sonucu: Çocuk işgücü.[ A result of income distribution inequality in Turkey: Child labour ] Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 14(1), 25-41.

  42. KOÇKAM [Koç Üniversitesi Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Kadın Çalışmaları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, The Center for Gender Studies at Koç University  ] (2019). 2018 verileriyle Türkiye’de toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği. [Social gender equality with 2018 data in Turkey] Retrieved from https://kockam.ku.edu.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/KOCKAM_Rapor_DIGITALCOPY-1.pdf

  43. Koçyiğit, E. & Şimşek, H. (2019). Kapsayıcı eğitim bağlamında Türkiye’de ortaöğretim programlarında çokkültürlülüğün izleri. [Traces of multiculturalism in the secondary education curriculums in

  44. Turkey within the context of inclusive education] Kuram ve Uygulamada Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 3(2) 75-90.

  45. Köseoğlu, A., Üçkardeşler, E. & Dinçer M. A. (2014). Devam Oranlarının Artırılması Teknik Destek Projesi: Şanlıurfa-Mardin-Van-Muş illerinde devamsızlık durum analizi. [Technical Assistance Project for Increasing Attendance Rates: Analysis of absenteeism in Şanlıurfa-Mardin-Van-Muş provinces ] MEB, Ankara.

  46. Kutay, V. (2018). Inclusive education in Turkey. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 2(2), 144-162.

  47. Mavi Kalem. (2019). Suriyeli çocukların eğitimi araştırma raporu.[Education of Syrian children research report]Retrieved from http://www.mavikalem.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Suriyeli-%C3%87ocuklar%C4%B1n-E%C4%9Fitimi-Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rma-Raporu.pdf

  48. McCleary-Sills, Hanmer, Parsons & Klugman (2015) Child marriage: a critical barrier to girls’ schooling and gender equality in education, The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 13(3), 69-80, DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2015.1075755

  49. MoNE (2008) Kaynaştırma yoluyla eğitim uygulamaları genelgesi [Educational practices through inclusion]. Ankara: Ministry of National Education. Retrieved from https://orgm. meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2015_10/08101631_ kaynatrmayoluylaeitimuygulamasgenelgesi.pdf.

  50. MoNE (2018). Millî eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim 2017-2018. [National education statistics: Formal education 2017-2018] Ankara: MEB.

  51. MoNE (2022). Millî eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim 2021-2022 [National education statistics: Formal education 2021-2022] Ankara: MEB.

  52. Nartgün, Ş. S., & Dilekçi, Ü. (2016). Eğitimi destekleme ve yetiştirme kurslarına ilişkin öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşleri. [Student and teacher views on educational support and training courses] Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 22(4), 537-564

  53. OECD (2012), Equity and quality in education: supporting disadvantaged students and schools, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en

  54. Özbaş, M. (2015). Personal and familial properties of street children – street children: the forgotten or not remembered ones. Journal of Education and Learning 4 (1), 97-107.

  55. Özbaş, M. (2018). Dezavantajlı sosyolojik tabakalarda zorunlu eğitim sürecini etkileyen değişkenler.[ The variables affecting the compulsory education process in disadvantageous sociologic classes] Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(4), 1143-1154

  56. Özcan, K., Balyer, A. & Yıldız, A. (2018). Ekonomik olarak dezavantajlı bölgelerde görev yapan ortaokul müdürlerinin liderlik davranışları.[ Leadership behaviors of school principals who work in economically disadvantaged regions] Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 14(2): 532-547.

  57. Perry, L., & McConey, A. (2010). School socio-economic composition and student outcomes in Australia: Implications for educational policy Australian Journal of Education, 54 (1), 72–85.

  58. Peters, S.J. (2003). Inclusive education: Achieving education for all by including those with disabilities and special education needs. Prepared for the disability group The World Bank. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/614161468325299263/text/266900WP0English0Inclusive0Education.txt

  59. Polat, O. (2008). Türkiye’de çocuk haklarının durumu.[ The state of the rights of the child in Turkey] Toplum ve Demokrasi, 2 (2), 149-157.

  60. Polat, F. (2011). Inclusion in education: A step towards social justice. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 51–58.

  61. Raguindin, P. Z. J., Ping, L. Y., Duereh, F., & Lising, R. L. S. (2020). Inclusive practices of in-service teachers: A quantitative exploration of a Southeast Asian context. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 787-797. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.787

  62. Rose, P., Beeby, J. & Parker, D. (1995). Academic rigour in the lived experience of researchers using phenomenological methods in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 21(6), 1123-1129. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2648.1995.21061123.x

  63. Sal, Ö. (2015). Zorunlu göç ve kentleşme: Siirt örneği.[ Forced migration and urbanization, Siirt case] (Unpublished MA Thesis) Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla

  64. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 246–255.

  65. Sarı, T., F. Nayir, and Ü Kahraman. (2020). A study on inclusive education in Turkey. Journal of Education and Future 18: 69–82.

  66. Siyez, D.M. & Beycioğlu, K. (2020). Gender equality in education from kindergarten to higher education: policies and practices In Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education , (pp.1687-1710), Springer:UK

  67. Stubbs, S. (2008). Inclusive education. Where there are few resources. The Atlas Alliance: Norway

  68. Şahin, İ. (2006). İlköğretim müfredat laboratuvar okullarının okul geliştirme süreci açısından incelenmesi [A study of curriculum laboratory schools in terms of school improvement] (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir.

  69. Şahin, H. (2019). Türkiye’de eğitimde fırsat eşit(siz)liği ve bireylerin eğitim kararları: Ardahan ve Karabük örneği  [(In)equality of opportunity in education in Turkey and education decisions of individuals: The case of Ardahan and Karabük] (Unpublished PhD Thesis), İstanbul University, İstanbul

  70. Şimşek, Ü. (2019). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin kapsayıcı eğitime yönelik tutum ve özyeterlikleri ile sınıf içi uygulamalara ilişkin görüşlerinin karşılaştırılması. [Comparison of social studies teachers' attitudes and self-efficacy towards inclusive education and their views on classroom practices ] (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.

  71. Şimşek, H., Dağıstan, A., Şahin, C., Koçyiğit, E., Dağıstan Yalçınkaya G., Kart, M. & Dağdelen, S. (2019). Kapsayıcı eğitim bağlamında Türkiye’de temel eğitim programlarında çokkültürlülüğün izleri. [The traces of multiculturalism in the primary education programs in Turkey within the context of inclusive education] Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 177-197

  72. Teherani A, Martimianakis T, Stenfors-Hayes T, Wadhwa A, & Varpio L. (2015).  Choosing a qualitative research approach. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 7(4), 669–70.

  73. Taylor, S., & Sidhu, R. K. (2012). Supporting refugee students in schools: What constitutes inclusive education? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(1), 39-56.

  74. UNESCO (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. France: UNESCO.

  75. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). (2019.. New Methodology Shows that 258 Million Children, Adolescents and Youth Are Out of School. Montreal: UNESCO UIS. Fact Sheet No. 56 http://uis. unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/new-methodoloqy-shows-258-million-childrenadolescents- and-youth-are-out-school.pdf.

  76. Unterhalter, E. (2010). Partnership, participation and power for gender equality in education. UNGEI E4 Conference, Dakar Senegal. Retrieved from http://www.e4conference.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/SituationAnalysis_EN.pdf

  77. Veland, J., Midthassel, U.V., & Idsoe, T. (2009) Perceived socio-economic status and social inclusion in school: interactions of disadvantages, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53 (6), 515-531.

  78. Vislie, L. (2003). From integration to inclusion: Focusing global trends and changes in the western European societies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18, 17–35

  79. Waitoller, F. R., & Artiles, A. J. (2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education a critical review and notes for a research program. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 319-356,

  80. Westwood, P.(2013). Inclusive and adaptive teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom. New York: Routledge.

  81. Yaşar, M.M. (2014). Sosyo-ekonomik açıdan eğitimde fırsat eşitliği: Giresun örneği [Equality of opportunity in education from a socio-economic perspective: The case of Giresun] (Unpublished MA Thesis) Giresun University, Giresun.

  82. Yaşar, M.R. & Amaç, Z. (2018). Experiences of pre-service teachers about educating disadvantaged students: Challenges and opportunities. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(2), 611-634.

  83. Yavuz, M., Özkaral, T., & Yıldız, D. (2016). Kız öğrencilerin örgün eğitimlerini sürdürmeme nedenleri. [The factors that cause female students to quit their formal education] 21. Yüzyılda Eğitim ve Toplum, 5 (14), 261-273.

  84. Yıldırım, M.C., Beltekin, N. & Oral, T.T. (2018). Kızların okula erişim ve devam oranlarının arttırılması: İkna süreci.[Increasing school attedance and schooling rates for girls: Persuasion process] e-Şarkiyat İlmi Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(2), 783-804.

  85. Yıldız, S. & Karakaş D.G.( 2019). Türkiye’de eğitim eşitsizliğinin farklı yüzleri.[ Various Facets of Educational Inequality in Turkey] Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 271-292.

  86. Yılmaz, K. & Altınkurt, Y. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının Türk eğitim sisteminin sorunlarına ilişkin görüşleri. [Prospective teachers’ views about the problems of Turkish educational system] Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8 (1), 942-973.

  87. Yılmaz, T. (2014). Eğitim ekonomi ilişkine eleştirel bir yaklaşım. [A critical approach to the relationship between education and economics] (Unpublished MA Thesis). Adnan Menderes University, Aydın.

bottom of page