Has the Experience of Online Study under COVID-19 Improved Outcomes of Study in Universities?
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 14 September 2023

Has the Experience of Online Study under COVID-19 Improved Outcomes of Study in Universities?

Yutaka Kurihara

Aichi University, Japan

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.06.03.775

Pages: 210-217

Keywords: COVID-19, Face-to-Face, Flipped Classroom, Online, Outcome

Abstract

This article examines the learning outcomes of after COVID-19 in universities. Now, almost all students experienced online learning instead of face-to-face during the pandemic period. The students surveyed after COVID-19 are now taking face-to-face classes after a year or two of online-based learning experience. This study compares their learning outcomes to those of students who previously only had face-to-face classes. Owing to the statistical analyses, some points are clear. Final results after COVID-19 clearly show that student outcomes dropped. Attendance and quiz scores also drop slightly and lead to reduced scores in the final results. It can be inferred that students have lost their attitude to take on challenges without giving up as a whole. Moreover, report scores dropped significantly. The rate of decline is larger than attendance and quiz scores. The reports in the surveyed classes do not rely on a shallow understanding or investigation, so the decreasing may be serious. Losing opportunities to attend and participate in classes reduce self-management ability and opportunities for communication. Online classes do not provide sufficient opportunities to be exposed to different ideas, objectively reexamine their own ideas, and create new ideas of their own. These skills may have suffered serious decline. Ultimately, it all comes down to encouraging students to be spontaneous. Even if the results are not so good, teaching too much should not be a hindrance to voluntary learning. One way to solve this seems to be a flipped classroom.

References

  1. Assunção, F. M., Alexandra, B., Veiga, S. A. M., Diana, P., Paulo, P. (2021). Portuguese higher education students’ adaption to online teaching and learning in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Personal and contextual factors. Higher Education, 83(6), 1389-1408.

  2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00748-x

  3. Atef, A., & Hani, J. (2022). Education leaders’ perception on the effectiveness of online learning during the COVID-19 crises in UAE universities. Nurture, 16(2), 54-64.

  4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55951/nurture.v16i2.127

  5. Boca, G. D. (2021). Factors influencing students’ behavior and attitude towards online education during COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(13), 7469.

  6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137469

  7. Budur, T., Demir, A., & Cura, F. (2021). University readiness to online education during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 8(1), 180-200.

  8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v8i1p180

  9. Davenport, C. E. (2018). Evolution in student perceptions of a flipped classroom in a computer programming course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(4), 30-35

  10. Garrison, D., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.

  11. Hasan, G. (2022). The quality of assessment during Covid-19 online education in the eyes of students: Tishk International University Case. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Students, 9(2), 124-140.

  12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v9i2p124

  13. Khaldoun, M. H., AL-Bashaireh, A. M., Zahran, Z., AL-Daghestani, A., & AL-Habashneh, H. (2021). University students’ interaction, internet self-efficiency, self-regulation and satisfaction with online education during pandemic crises of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2). The International Journal of Educational Management, 35(3), 713-725.

  14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2020-0513

  15. Kavakoğlu, A. A., Özer, D. G., Débora, D.-C., & Ömer, B. (2022). Architectural design communication (ADC) in online education during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison of Turkish and Spanish universities. Open House International, 47(2), 361-384.

  16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1018/OHI-07-2021-0144

  17. Kumar, G. D., & Kumar, G. P. (2021). Transition to online higher education during COVID-19 pandemic: Turmoil and way forward to developing country of South Asia-Nepal. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(1), 93-111.

  18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2020-0051.

  19. Stoian, C., Farcaşiu, M. A., Gabrie-Mugurel, D. (2022). Transition from online to face-face education after COVID-19: The benefits of online education from students’ perspective. Sustainability, 14(19), 12812

  20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912812

  21. van Wyk, M. M. (2018). Economics student teachers’ views on the usefulness of a flipped classroom pedagogical approach for an open distance e-learning environment. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(4), 255-265.

  22. DOI. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-07-2017-0068

bottom of page