Inadequate Grammatical Proficiency of B. Ed. English Majors: Claims and Confessions
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 17 December 2022

Inadequate Grammatical Proficiency of B. Ed. English Majors: Claims and Confessions

Kamal Kumar Poudel, Rudra Bahadur Thapa

Tribhuvan University (Nepal)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.671

Pages: 382-392

Keywords: Curriculum, English Majors, Performance, Proficiency

Abstract

Subjective critiques can often be heard about the quality of English language teaching and learning in higher education in Nepal — both as being deteriorated and upgraded. This study stemming from the major finding of a previous one — low grammatical proficiency of B. Ed. English majors studying at a community campus in Nepal — was an attempt, as a case study, to explore the reasons perceived by the English majors themselves and their teachers as the participants. Focus group discussions were conducted separately with the different groups of participants. Discussed thematically in this article, the major reasons for this as perceived by the participants were the decreased sense of responsibility and misconceptions about the essence of the practical examinations, inappropriate instructional techniques — specifically excessive lectures — and students’ poor English-base and absenteeism as a tendency. Likewise, some other reasons were students’ insufficient exposure to English, their hesitation to produce English and a lack of professional development opportunities for the teachers. Low grammatical competence of the students and less favorable learning environment were also identified as being attributable to the problem. Finally we suggest that some common efforts of the students, the teachers and the institution are required to improve the situation.

References

  1. Abou-El-Kheir, A., & MacLeod, P. (2019). The struggle for policy borrowing and continuous reform in English language teaching in the Gulf Corporation Council (GCC) countries. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 32-46). Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-21

  2. Aji, R. H. (2020). Dampak Covid-19 Pada Pendidian di Indonesia : Sekolah, Keterampilan dan Proses Pembelajaran [The impact of Covid-19 on education in Indonesia: schools, skills and learning processes]. SALAM : Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 7(5), 395-402. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i5.15314

  3. Alharbi, J. M. (2021). Vocabulary knowledge among English majors in Saudi Arabia University. Technium, 24, 769-784. doi:https://www.techniumscience.com

  4. Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2012). A student perspective on low English proficiency in Oman. International Education Studies, 5(6), 263-271. doi:10.5539/ies.v5n6p263

  5. Alsammari, H. (2022). Integrating the low proficiency of Saudi EFL learnears. Arab World English Journal, 129-144. doi:10.24093/awej/vol13no1.9

  6. Alsubaie, M. A. (2022). Distance education and the social literacy of elementary school students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(7), 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09811

  7. Amrullah, e. a. (2022). Student-Student Interaction in Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study. Education Quarterly Reviews, 180-191.

  8. Argaheni, N. B. (2020). Sistematik Review:Dampak Perkuliahan Daring Saat Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Mahasiswa Indonesia [Systematic review: the impact of online lectures during the covid-19 pandemic on Indonesian students]. Placentum : Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan dan Aplikasinya, 8(2), 99-108. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/placentum/article/download/43008/28002

  9. Bo, W. V., Fu, M., & Lim, W. Y. (2022). Revisiting English language proficiency and its impact on the academic performance of domestic university students in Singapore. Language Testing, 39(2).

  10. BPS. (2017). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia Triwulan III-2017 [Development of Indonesian economy in the third quarter], No. 101/11/Th.XX, 6 November 2017.Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik RI.

  11. CDC. (2076 [2019]). Secondary Education Curriculum (for Grade 11 and 12) English (optional). Government of Nepal, Ministry of Education, Curriculum Development Center.

  12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

  13. Cummins, J., López-Gopar, M. E., & Sughrua, W. M. (2019). English language teaching in North American schools. In Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 10-26). Springer. doi:. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2

  14. Dongi, M. H. (2022). A study on factors affecting English-majored students'difficulties in their speaking performance. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(1), 121-123.

  15. Duff, P. A., & Anderson, T. (2015). Case study research. In J. D. Brown, & C. Combe (Eds.), The Cambridge gude to research in language teaching and learning (pp. 112-119). Cambridge University Press.

  16. Fauzi, M. A. (2022). E-learning in higher education institutions during COVID-19 pandemic: current and future trends through bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 8(5), 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09433

  17. Gao, X. (2019). The global scope of English langaue teaching: Section introduction. In Second handbook of English language teaching(pp. 3-7). Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2

  18. Ghenghesh, P. (2015). The relationship between English language proficiency and academic performance of university students - Should academic institutions really be concerned? International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(2), 91-97. doi:https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.91

  19. Hadi, S. (1989). Metode Research II. Jogjakarta: Andi Ofset, cet. XIX.

  20. Hall, G. (2016). Introduction: English language teaching in the contemporary world. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of Emglish language teaching. Routledge.

  21. Jaya, H. P., Petrus, I., & Pitaloka, N. L. (2022). Speaking performance and problems faced by English major students at a university in South Sumetra. Indonesian EFL Journal, 8(1), 105-112. doi:https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v8i1.5603

  22. Kebudayaan, K. P. (2020, September 12). kemdikbud.go.id. Retrieved from Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/09/kemendikbud-resmikan-kebijakan-bantuan-kuota-data-internet-2020

  23. Kebudayaan, K. P. (2021, Januari 15). kemdikbud.go.id. Retrieved from Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan: https://kuota-belajar.kemdikbud.go.id/

  24. Langoday, A. H. (2021). Laporan PPL di SD Inpres Manunai [PPL report of SD Inpres Manunai].Maumere: FKIP Universitas Nusa Nipa.

  25. Livana, e. (2020). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Bagi Masyarakat Desa [Impact of Covid-19 pandemic towards village society]. Indonesian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 37-48. Retrieved from http://jurnal.globalhealthsciencegroup.com/index.php/IJNHS/article/view/225/165

  26. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2022). Second language research: Methodology and design (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

  27. Nugraheni, R. A. (2020). Dampak Covid-19 Terhadap Terhadap Proses Pembelajaran Daring di Sekolah Dasar [the impact of covid-19 on the online learning process in elementary schools]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IAHN Tampung Penyang Palangka Raya (pp. 11-20). Palangkaraya: IAHN Tampung Penyang Palangka Raya.

  28. PackAfrica. (2017, 11 15). Business Matching Program (BMP). Retrieved from PackAfrica. Org: http://www.packafrica.org/business-matching-program-bmp

  29. Philipson, R. (2012). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.

  30. Piliang, Y. A. (2001). Sebuah Dunia Yang Menakutkan : Mesin-Mesin Kekerasan Dalam Jagat Raya Chaos [A terrifying world: violent machines in the chaos universe].Bandung: Mizan.

  31. Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, I. S. (2022). Overcoming the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: A Science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy perspective. Health Policy and Technology, 11(3), 111-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100650

  32. Prapphal, K. (2014). English proficiency of Thai learners and directions of teaching and learning in Thailand. Journal of Studies in the English Langauge.

  33. Puryono, E. M. (2021). Unprepared management decreases education performance in kindergartens during Covid-19 pandemic. Heliyon. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07138

  34. Ria Puspita Sari, e. (2021). Dampak Pembelajaran Daring Bagi Siswa SD Selama Covid-19 [The impact of online learning for elementary school students during covid-19]. Prima Magistra : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikam, 9-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v2i1.732

  35. Rizal, J. G. (2020, August 04). kompas.com. Retrieved from Kompas: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/08/04/151000465/mengenal-apa-itu-resesi-ekonomi-dampak-dan-penyebabnya-?page=all.

  36. Safitri, e. (2020). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Penerapan Pembelajaran Daring di SD [The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the implementation of online learning in elementary schools]. LAPK UNNES, 1-10. Retrieved from https://kkn.unnes.ac.id/lapkknunnes/32004_3519012001_6_Desa%20_20200927_155423.pdf

  37. Salman, Z. M., & Hazem, A. H. (2022). The impact of grammatical competence on1st year university English students' written performance. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 11455-11466. doi:https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5479

  38. Sarip, e. (2020). Dampak Covid-19 Terhadap Perekonomian Masyarakat dan Pembangunan Desa [The impact of covid-10 on the community economy and village development]. Al-Mustashfa : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Islam, 12-25. Retrieved from https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/al-mustashfa/article/view/6732/3120

  39. Shalihah, N. F. (2020, December 03). kompas.com.Retrieved from Kompas: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/12/03/063000665/kilas-balik-9-bulan-pandemi-covid-19-dan-dampaknya-bagi-indonesia?page=all.

  40. Shehzad A. Naroo, P. B. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on global contact lens education. Journal of Optometry, 60-68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.11.002

  41. SMIDEX. (2017, November 15). Business Matching Session. Retrieved from SME Corporation Malaysia (SME Corp. Malaysia) SMIDEX 2017: http://www.smidex.my/node/4

  42. Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian hukum [Introduction to law research].Jakarta: UI Perss.

  43. Suparman, A. e. (2022). The Effect of Using Google Classroom and WhatsApp Applications on Learning Activities. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(1), 237-244. Retrieved from https://www.asianinstituteofresearch.org/

  44. Thapa, R. B. (2022). Grammatical competence of B. Ed. English students: A case of Kanakai Multiple Campus, Surunga. Unpublished mini-research.

  45. Trinh, N. B., & Pham, D. T. (2021). Challenges in speaking classrooms among non-English majors. Vietnam Journal of Education, 5(2), 37-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2021.52

  46. Ur, P. (2012). A course in English language teaching: Practice and theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  47. Virdita, R. (2020, February 12). kontan.co.id.Retrieved from Kontan: https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/apa-itu-resesi-ekonomi-dan-dampaknya-yang-resmi-dialami-indonesia.

  48. Wardiono, K. (2012). Chaos Theory : Sebuah Ancangan Dalam Memahami Hukum [Chaos Theory: an approach to understanding law]. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(2), 136-148.

  49. Wenting Zhu, Q. L. (2022). Implementation and Challenges of Online Education during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A National Survey of Children and Parents in China. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 209-219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.07.004

  50. Yufrinalis, Marianus. (2021). Peluang dan Tantangan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas di SD Inpres Manunai Kota Maumere [Opportunities and challenges of limited face-to-face learning at SD Inpres Manunai, Maumere City]. In A. Wijayanto, Akademisi Dalam Penuangan Gagasan, Strategi, dan Tantangan Dalam Pelaksanaan PTMT (pp. 175-182). Tulungagung: Akademia Pustaka.

  51. Zalik Nuryana, W. X. (2022). Students mental health during COVID-19: Comprehensive government and parental involvement in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Psychiatri. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103197

bottom of page