Influence of Demonstration Methods and Student’s Activity on Learning Outcomes
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 12 April 2021

Influence of Demonstration Methods and Student’s Activity on Learning Outcomes

Purdiyanto, Rambat Nur Sasongko, Muhammad Kristiawan, Ahmad Walid, Raden Gamal Tamrin Kusumah

Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Garuda Putih Jambi (Indonesia), Universitas Bengkulu (Indonesia), Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu (Indonesia)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.200

Pages: 91-99

Keywords: Demonstration Method, Student Activity and Learning Outcomes

Abstract

This research is motivated by the fact in the field that the fourth-grade students' mathematics learning outcomes are still low in Public Elementery School 16 Bengkulu City. This is presumably, the lack of application of demonstration methods and student activeness towards student learning outcomes. On this basis, this study is focused on discussing mathematics learning using demonstration methods. The problem of this research is the low student learning outcomes and the students' lack of understanding of the broad and perimeter material. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of demonstration methods and student activeness on mathematics learning outcomes of fourth-grade students of SD Negeri 16 Bengkulu City. This type of research is a quantitative study with an experimental method approach. Data collection techniques using observation, tests and documentation. The data analysis technique used the t test. The result of this research is the demonstration method and student activeness have a significant effect. So it can be concluded that the higher the student's activity, the higher the learning outcomes and the demonstration method as well as the learning outcomes, which means that the working hypothesis (Ha) in this study is accepted, that is, there are differences in student activeness in the control and experimental classes.

References

  1. Ahmad, M., & Nasution, D. P. (2018). Analisis Kualitatif Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Yang Diberi Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik [Qualitative Analysis of Students' Mathematical Communication Ability Given Realistic Mathematics Learning]. Jurnal Gantang, 3(2), 83–95.

  2. Amalia, N., Darma, Y., & Wahyudi, W. (2020). Pengembangan Pop Up Book SMP berbasis Ideal Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis [Development of Junior High School Pop Up Book based on Ideal Problem Solving to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving Ability]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan MIPA dan Teknologi II, 1(1), 389–398.

  3. Andiyana, M. A., Maya, R., & Hidayat, W. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Bangun Ruang [Analysis of Junior High School Students' Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability on Building Space Material]. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(3), 239–248.

  4. Ardiyani, S. M. (2018). Realistic Mathematics Education in Cooperative Learning Viewed from Learning Activity. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 301–310.

  5. Chen, S., Yang, S. J. H., & Hsiao, C. (2016). Exploring Student Perceptions, Learning Outcome and Gender Differences in a Flipped Mathematics Course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1096–1112.

  6. Dan, P., Modul, K., Berasaskan, P., Bagi, P., Matematik, M. P., Laku, T., Positif, P., Tingkah, D., Sosial, L., Chin, L. C., & Zakaria, E. (2014). Development and Validation of the Game-Based Learning Module to Enhance Mathematics Achievement, Positive Learning Behaviours and Pro Social Behaviours. J. Sci. Math. Lett. UPSI.

  7. De Witte, K., Haelermans, C., & Rogge, N. (2015). The Effectiveness of a Computer-Assisted Math Learning Program. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(4), 314–329.

  8. Dewi, E. R. (2018). Metode Pembelajaran Modern dan Konvensional Pada Sekolah Menengah Atas [Modern and Conventional Learning Methods in Senior High Schools]. Pembelajar: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, Dan Pembelajaran. https://doi.org/10.26858/pembelajar.v2i1.5442

  9. Djafar, S., Nadar, N., Arwan, A., & Elihami, E. (2019). Increasing the Mathematics Learning through the Development of Vocational Mathematics Modules of STKIP Muhammadiyah Enrekang. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(1), 69–79.

  10. Hamzah, A. (2016). Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika [Planning and Learning Mathematics Strategy].

  11. Hermawan, I. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed Method) [Educational Research Methodology (Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method)]. Hidayatul Quran.

  12. Lestari, D., Komarudin, K., Mujib, M., & Mardiyah, M. (2020). Mathematical Module Based on Islamic Values as a Development of Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL). Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v6i3.1098

  13. Lia, N., Musaddat, S., & Jaelani, A. K. (2020). Pengaruh Metode Struktur Analitik Sintetik (SAS) Terhadap Keterampilan Membaca Permulaan Peserta Didik Kelas 1 SDN 1 Gerung Selatan Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020 [The Effect of Synthetic Analytical Structural (SAS) Methods on the Beginning Reading Skills of Class 1 Students of SDN 1 Gerung Selatan for the Academic Year 2019/2020]. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(2).

  14. Lin, M.-H., & Chen, H. (2017). A Study of the Effects of Digital Learning on Learning Motivation and Learning Outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564.

  15. Matulnaimah, A. I. M. (2018). Kreativitas Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Aqidah Akhlak Di MTs Assyafi’iyah Gondang Tulungagung Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018 [Teacher Creativity in Learning Aqidah Akhlak at MTs Assyafi'iyah Gondang Tulungagung Academic Year 2017/2018].

  16. Mertler, C. A. (2017). Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators. In Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483396484

  17. Peters, R. S. (2015). Ethics and Education (Routledge Revivals). Routledge.

  18. Privitera, G. J. (2016). Survey and Correlational Research Designs. Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences.

  19. Risdianto, E. (2019). Analisis Pendidikan Indonesia Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 [Analysis of Indonesian Education in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0]. April, 0–16.

  20. Riyanto, S., & Hatmawan, A. A. (2020). Metode Riset Penelitian Kuantitatif Penelitian Di Bidang Manajemen, Teknik, Pendidikan Dan Eksperimen [Research Methods Research Quantitative Research in the fields of management, engineering, education and experiments]. Deepublish.

  21. Saregar, A., Giyoto, G., Ariyani, F., Pawe, T. I., Pricilia, A., & Astriawan, D. (2019). How to Design Physics Posters Learning Media with Islamic Values in Developing Learning Motivation and Student Character? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012093

  22. Sari, I. K., & Yunianta, T. N. H. (2017). Efforts to Improve Math Learning Result of Fourth Grade Students Through Contextual Model Teaching And Learning With Cuisenaire Rods Media. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2017.v7.i2.p143-152

  23. Satria, I., & Kusumah, R. G. T. (2019). Analisis Keterkaitan Motivasi Dan Apersepsi Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS [Analysis of the Relationship between Motivation and Perception of Social Studies Learning Outcomes]. Indonesian Journal of Social Science Education (IJSSE), 1(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.29300/IJSSE.V1I1.2587

  24. Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Agoestanto, A. (2017). Batasan Prasyarat Uji Normalitas Dan Uji Homogenitas Pada Model Regresi Linear [Limitation of Prerequisite Normality Test and Homogeneity Test in Linear Regression Model]. Unnes Journal of Mathematics, 6(2), 168–177.

  25. Usmadi, U. (2020). Pengujian Persyaratan Analisis (Uji Homogenitas Dan Uji Normalitas) [Testing Requirements Analysis (Homogeneity Test and Normality Test)]. Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(1).

  26. Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif [Test the Validity and Reliability of Quantitative Research Instruments]. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1).

bottom of page