Investigating the Relationship between University Students’ Cyberloafing Profiles and Life Goals according to Various Variables
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 15 December 2022

Investigating the Relationship between University Students’ Cyberloafing Profiles and Life Goals according to Various Variables

Hatice Zekavet Kabasakal, Kadir Demir

Dokuz Eylul University (Turkey), İzmir Demokrasi University (Turkey)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.635

Pages: 449-463

Keywords: Cyberloafing, Life Goals, University Students

Abstract

Cyberloafing is a widely recognized concept associated with the Internet, which has a wide usage area today. Cyberloafing is extensively noticed, particularly among young people, and its association with a variety of variables is being researched. In this study, university students' life goals and cyberloafing profiles were analyzed on the basis of gender, age, class, grade point average, relationship status, faculty, foreign language knowledge, daily digital tool usage time, age of first using the internet, and digital devices used. The research's study group was comprised of university students from Izmir's public and private universities. 334 students posted data. The study excluded 31 participants who were found to have missing or incomplete data. The study group included 303 students. As data collection instruments, the cyberloafing scale, life goals scale, and personal information form were employed. According to the data, there is a positive and moderate association between students' levels of cyberloafing and their life goals. Cyberloafing varies according to criteria such as age, gender, faculty, and daily internet usage. Similarly, it was found that life goals changed depending on department, relationship status, and daily internet usage time.

References

  1. Akada, T. & Kabasakal, Z. (2018). An evaluation regarding cyber bullying and university students, SSSjournal,Vol:4, Issue:24, .4977-4993.

  2. Akbulut, Y., Dönmez, O., & Dursun, O. O. (2017). Cyberloafing and social desirability bias among students and employees. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 87-95.

  3. Akbulut, Y., Dursun, Ö.Ö., Dönmez, O., & Şahin, Y.L. (2016). In search of a measure to investigate cyberloafing in educational settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 616-625.

  4. Aydıner, B. B. (2011). The relationship between sub-dimensions of the life goals with general self-efficacy, life-satisfaction and some variables [Unpublished master thesis]. Sakarya University.

  5. Baturay, M. H. & Toker, S. (2015). An investigation of the impact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educational setting angle. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 358-366.

  6. Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and eX̄ternal locus of control. Computers in human behavior, 24(3), 1067-1084.

  7. Blau, G., Yang, Y. ve Ward Cook, K. (2006). Testing a Measure of Cyberloafing. Journal of Allied Health, 35(1), 9-17.

  8. Chou, W. Y. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: Implications for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1249

  9. Çevik, C., Ciğerci, Y., Kılıç, İ., & Uyar, S. (2020). The relationship between smartphone addiction and the meaning and purpose of life in health science students. Psikiyatrik bakımda perspektifler, 56 (3), 705-711

  10. Çelik, N. D. (2016). The relationship between meaning in life and the purpose of life for university students. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 6(1), 133-141.

  11. Dursun, Ö. Ö., Dönmez, O. & Akbulut, Y. (2018). Predictors of cyberloafing among preservice ınformation technology teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 22-41.

  12. Ekinci, N. (2022). An examination of the relation between social media use and relationship satisfaction in university students [Unpublished master thesis]. Dokuz Eylül University.

  13. Emmons, R.A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality. New York, Guilford, s.123- 145.

  14. Gezgin, D., & Sarsar, F. (2020). The views of the students that are studying in the department of CEIT on the situation of cyberloafing: a mixed method study. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 24(1), 243-256.

  15. Gülnar, M. (2020). A study on smartphone cyberloafing of university students in Turkey. Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 92-100.

  16. Gökçearslan, Ş., Uluyol, Ç., & Şahin, S. (2018). Smartphone addiction, cyberloafing, stress and social support in university students: A pathway analysis. Çocuk ve Gençlik Hizmetleri İncelemesi, 91, 47-54.

  17. Heady, B. (2008). Life goals matter to happiness: A revision of set-point theory. Social Indicators Research, 86: 213-231.

  18. İnce, M. ve Gül, H. (2011). The relation of cyber slacking behaviors with various organizational outputs: EX̄ample of Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University. European Journal of Scientific Research,52(4), 507-527.

  19. İlhan, T., & Özbay, Y. (2010). The predictive role of life goals and psychological need satisfaction on subjective well-being. Turkish Psychological Counseling & Guidance Journal, 4(34).

  20. İnternetworldstats (2022) https://internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

  21. Kalaycı, E. (2010). The investigation of relationship between cyberloafing and self-regulated learning strategies among undergraduate students [Unpublished master thesis]. Hacettepe University.

  22. Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., Öztürk, H. T. & Sezer, B. (2015). Cyberloafing as a barrier to the successful integration of information and communication Technologies into teaching and learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 290-298.

  23. Lenhart, A. (2015), “Teens, social media & technology overview 2015”. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.

  24. Levent, A. (2020). Examining the relationship between smartphone addiction and communication skills university students  [Unpublished master thesis]. İstanbul Gelişim University.

  25. Lim, V. K., & Chen, D. J. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work?. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(4), 343-353.

  26. Lyubomirsky S, Sheldon KM, Schkade D (2005) Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Rev Gen Psychol, 9:111-131.

  27. Mahatanankoon, P., Anandarajan, M., ve Igbaria, M. (2004). Development of a measure of personal web usage in the workplace. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour, 7(1), s.93-104.

  28. Myers D, Deiner E (1995) Who is happy. American Psychological Society, 6: 1-19.

  29. Şahin, İ., Zoraloğlu, Y. R., & Firat, N. Ş. (2011). University students’ aims in life, educational goals, expectations from the university and their state of satisfaction. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 3(3), 429-452.

  30. Şenel, S., Günaydin, S., Saritaş, M. T., & Çiğdem, H. (2019). The factors predicting cyberloafing behaviors of undergraduate students. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(1), 95-105.

  31. Ugrin, J. C., Pearson, J. M., & Odom, M. D. (2008). Profiling cyber-slackers in the workplace: Demographic, cultural, and workplace factors. Journal of Internet Commerce, 6(3), 75-89.

  32. We are social (2021). https://wearesocial.com/blog/2021/07/digital-2021-i-dati-di-luglio.

  33. Tan, M., ve Demir, M. (2018). The effects of personality traits of employees on cyberloafing behaviour. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 4(1), 49-60.

  34. Tüik (2021). Hane Halkı Bilişim Teknolojileri (BT) Kullanım Araştırmaları, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/IndeX̄?p=Survey-on-Information-and-Communication-Technology-(ICT)-Usage-in-Households-and-by-Individuals-2021-37437.

  35. Wong PTP, Fry PSE (1998). The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

bottom of page