Learning Takes Flight: Empowering Growth through Dialogic Teaching in Individual Badminton Lessons
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 15 September 2023

Learning Takes Flight: Empowering Growth through Dialogic Teaching in Individual Badminton Lessons

Pauline P. L. Chin

Meragang Sixth Form College

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.06.03.777

Pages: 224-236

Keywords: Dialogic Teaching, Metacognitive, Qualitative Inquiry, Teacher-Student Relationship

Abstract

In the dynamic landscape of education, characterised by the need for resilience, the convergence of dialogic teaching and the passion for badminton presents a pathway to profound learning experiences. This article explores the intersection of these two realms, highlighting the invaluable insights and synergies they contribute within a robust educational framework. This qualitative investigation involves two experienced teachers and three Year 12 student athletes actively engaged in dialogic-based lessons. The data collection process encompasses recorded observations and interviews with the teachers and students and uses thematic analysis techniques to analyse the gathered information comprehensively. The findings reveal that dialogic teaching catalyses student engagement and growth, opens dialogues that stimulate metacognitive processes, promotes personal growth and respectful exchange of ideas, and extends the value of transferable skills beyond the court. The role of the teacher emerges as pivotal in shaping interactional behaviour and establishing an environment conducive to skill and knowledge acquisition. Through scaffolded dialogic interactions, students are guided towards critical thinking, enabling them to develop a more thorough understanding of the subject and refine their skills. The insights gained contribute to creating transformative learning experiences by promoting dialogue, resilience, and transferable skills, empowering students to excel in both badminton and their learning outcomes, preparing them for future challenges and fostering their holistic development.

References

  1. Alexander, R. J. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040143

  2. Alexandre, O., Sylvain, H., Joséphine, B., Corinne, F., & Lazhar, L. (2020). Influence of traditional sporting games on the development of creative skills in team sports. The case of football. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611803

  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can ‘‘thematic analysis’’ offer health and well-being researchers? International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. 9, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152

  4. Brinkworth, M. E., McIntyre, J., Juraschek, A. D., & Gehlbach, H. (2018). Teacher-student relationships: The positives and negatives of assessing both perspectives. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 55,24 - 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.09.002

  5. Bruner, J. S. (1997). Celebrating divergence: Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 40(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1159/000278705

  6. Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning Styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology. 24 (4). 419 – 444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000228834

  7. Cui, R. & Teo, P. (2021). Dialogic education for classroom teaching: a critical review. Language and Education, 35 (3), 187-203, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1837859

  8. Damsa, C. & Jornet, A. (2021). The unit of analysis in learning research: Approaches for imagining a transformative agenda. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 31. Part B. 100407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100407

  9. Díez-Palomar, J., Chan, M. C. E., David Clarke, D., & Padrós, M. (2021). How does dialogical talk promote student learning during small group work? An exploratory study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 30. Part A. 100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100540

  10. Evans, D., Butterworth, R., & Urquhart Law, G. (2019). Understanding associations between perceptions of student behaviour, conflict representations in the teacher-student relationship and teachers’ emotional experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education. 82. 55 – 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.008

  11. Fitzgibbon, L., & Murayama, K. (2022). Counterfactual curiosity: motivated thinking about what might have been. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 377 (1866), 20210340. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0340

  12. Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research. 97. 200 – 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.014

  13. Harvey, S., Pill, S., Hastie, P., & Wallhead, T. (2020). Physical education teachers’ perceptions of the successes, constraints, and possibilities associated with implementing the sport education model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 25 (5). 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1752650

  14. Hu, X., Suresh, N. L., Xue, C., & Rymer, W. Z. (2015). Extracting extensor digitorum communis activation patterns using high-density surface electromyography. Frontiers in Physiology. 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00279

  15. Karrass, C. L. (2013). In business as in life – you don’t get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate. Stanford Street Press.

  16. Koca, F. (2016). Motivation to learn and teacher-student relationship. Journal of International Education and Leadership. 6 (2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1135209

  17. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher. 17(2). 13–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017002013

  18. Padrós, M. (2020). Implications for social impact of dialogic teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00140

  19. Palmgren-Neuvonen, L., Littleton, K., & Hirvonen, N. (2021). Dialogic spaces in divergent and convergent collaborative learning tasks. Information and Learning Sciences. 122 (5). 409-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-02-2020-0043

  20. Saleh, A, Yuxin, C, Hmelo-Silver, C. E, Glazewski, K. D, Mott, B. W, & Lester, J. C. (2020). Coordinating scaffolds for collaborative inquiry in a game-based learning environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.  57. 1490 – 1518. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21656

  21. Teo, P. (2019). Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 21. 170 – 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.009

  22. Zhang, F. (2022). Fostering students’ well-being: The mediating role of teacher interpersonal behaviour and student-teacher relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796728

  23. Zhou, S., Chen, S., Wang, S., Zhao, Q., Zhou, Z., & Lu, C. (2017). Temporal and spatial patterns of neural activity associated with information selection in open-ended creativity. Neuroscience. PMID 29247775. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Neuroscience.2017.12.006

bottom of page