Multiple Mediation of Self-Esteem, Perception of Social Self-efficacy, and Social Anxiety in the Relationship Between Peer Support and Autonomy in Adolescents
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 11 October 2021

Multiple Mediation of Self-Esteem, Perception of Social Self-efficacy, and Social Anxiety in the Relationship Between Peer Support and Autonomy in Adolescents

Sinem E. Akbay, Mehtap Aktaş

The University of Mersin, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.04.367

Pages: 1-10

Keywords: Peer Support, Self-Esteem, Autonomy in Adolescents, Social Anxiety in Adolescents, Perception of Social Self-Efficacy

Abstract

The aim of this study is in the relationship between peer support and autonomy in adolescents; The aim of this study is to examine the mediating role of social self-efficacy perception, self-esteem and social anxiety variables in adolescents. The study group of the research consists of 462 high school students (237 women and 225 men). Of the students in the study group, 26% (120 people) were in the 9th grade, 28.6% (132 people) were in the 10th grade, 28.1% (130 people) were in the 11th grade and 16.5% ( 76 people) are studying in the 12th grade. Data collection tools used in the study; Adolescent Social Anxiety Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Short Form), Social Self-Efficacy Perception Scale, Peer Support Scale, Adolescent Autonomy Scale were used. The data were analyzed with Regression-based method and Bootstrap methods. According to the findings obtained from the study, it was observed that as peer support increases in adolescents, individuals' self-esteem and social self-efficacy perceptions increase, and as a result, their autonomy levels increase. In addition, it is seen that the increase in peer support in adolescents decreases the social anxiety of the individuals and thus the level of autonomy increases. In addition, it was found that the established model explained 41% of autonomy in adolescents.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.

  3. Beck, A. T. (2005). Bilişsel Terapi ve Duygusal Bozukluklar. (Çev. A. Türkcan ). Litera Yayıncılık: İstanbul.

  4. Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. (1985). Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective. New York: Basic Books.

  5. Black, K., and McCartney, K. (1997). Adolescent females’ security with parents predicts the quality of peer interactions. Social Development, 6, 91-110.

  6. Blos, P. (1967). The second individuation process of adolescence. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 22, 162-186.

  7. Bolger, K. E., Patterson, C. J., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1998). Peer relationships and self-esteem among children who have been maltreated. Child Development, 69, 1171-1197.

  8. Bryan, J. L., Quist, M. C., Young, C. M., Steers, M. N. & Lu, Q. (2015). General Needs Satisfaction As A Mediator Of The Relationship Between Ambivalence Over Emotional Expression And Perceived Social Support. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156(1), 115-121.

  9. Brown, B. B., & Lohr, M. J. (1987). Peer-group affiliation and adolescent self-esteem: An integration of ego identity and symbolic-interaction theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 47-55.

  10. Calsyn, R. J., Winter, J. P. & Burger, G.K. (2005). The relationship between social anxiety and social support in adolescent: A test of completing causal models. Adolescence, 15 (40), 103-113.

  11. Curtis, S. (1992). Promoting health through a developmental analysis of adolescent risk behavior. Journal of School Health, 62(9), 417-420.

  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

  13. Erath, S. A., Flanagan, K. S. & Bierman, K.L. (2007). Social anxiety and peer relations in early adolescence:Behavioral and cognitive factors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 405-416.

  14. Eriş, Y., & İkiz, F. E. (2013). Ergenlerin benlik saygısı ve sosyal kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki ve kişisel değişkenlerin etkileri. Turkish Studies, 8(6), 179-193.

  15. Friedlander, L. J., Reid, G. J., Shupak, N., and Cribbie, R. (2007). Social support, self-esteem,and stress as predictors of adjustment to university among first-year undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 259-274.

  16. Furman, W., Simon, V., Shaffer, L., & Bouchey, H. (2002). Adolescents’ working models and styles for relationships with parents, friends, and romantic partners. Child Development, 73, 241-255.

  17. Giedd, J.N. (2015). The amazing teen brain. Scientific American, 312, 32-37.

  18. Greenfield, P. M., Keller, H., Fuligni, A., & Maynard, A. (2003). Cultural pathways through universal development. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 461-490.

  19. Hazan, C., & Zeifman, D. (1999). Pair bonds as attachments: Evaluating the evidence. In J. Cassidy, and P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (pp. 336-354). New York: Guildford Press.

  20. Hortaçsu, N. (2003). Çocuklukta İlişkiler. Ankara: İmge Yayınları.

  21. İkiz, F. E., & Savi Çakar, F. (2010). The Relationship between multiple intelligences and academic achievements of second grade students. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3, 83-92.

  22. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). Özerk-ilişkisel benlik: Yeni bir sentez. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 11, 36-44.

  23. Ladd, G. W. (1999). Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle childhood. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 333-359.

  24. Lan, X. Y., & Wang, W. C. (2019). Direct and interactive effects of peer support and resilience on psychosocial adjustment in emerging adults with early left-behind experiences. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 277-288.

  25. Leary, M. R. ve Kowalski, R. M. (1995). Social Anxiety. The Guilford Press, New York.

  26. Lerner, R. M., & Castellino, D. (2002). Contemporary developmental theory and adolescence: A developmental systems and applied developmental science. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(6S), 122-135.

  27. Lüle, A. R., (2002). Lise Mezunu Olup Üniversiteye Hazırlanan Ergenlerin Özerklik Düzeyleri İle Kaygı Düzeyleri Arasında İlişkinin İncelenmesi. (Unpublished Master Thesis), İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

  28. Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L. (2001). Peer support: A theoretical perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25(2), 134-141.

  29. Mehtalia, K. & Vankar, G. K. (2004). Social anxiety in adolescents. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 46(3), 221-227.

  30. Noom, M. (1999). Adolescent Autonomy: Characteristics and Correlates. Delft: Eburen Publishers.

  31. Noom, M., Dekovic, M., & Meeus, W. (1999). Autonomy, attachment and psychosocial adjustment during adolescence: a double-edged sword?. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 771-783.

  32. Noom, M., Dekovic, M., & Meeus, W. (2001). Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(5), 577-595.

  33. Özdemir, Y., & Çok, F. (2011). Ergenlikte Özerklik Gelişimi. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(36), 152-164.

  34. Öztürk, M.O. (2004). Ruh Sağlığı Bozuklukları. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitapevi, s.98-99.

  35. Patterson, C. M. & Ritts, V. (1997). Social and Communicate Anxiety: A Review and Meta Analysis. Communication Yearbook 20.

  36. Rohner, R. P., & Rohner, E. C. (1980). Antecedents and con-sequences of parental rejection: A theory of emotional abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 4, 189-19

  37. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  38. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti and D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (Vol. 1, pp. 795-849). New York: Wiley.

  39. Steffenhagen, R. A. (1990). Self-Esteem Therapy.Praeger Publishers. New York.

  40. Steinberg, L., & Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841-851.

  41. Şad, E.D. (2007). Akranları Tarafından Reddedilen ve Kabul Edilen İlköğretim II. Kademe Öğrencilerinin Özsaygı, Sosyal Beceri, Davranış Problemleri ve Okul Başarılarının Karşılaştırılması. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

  42. Taysi, E. (2000). Benlik Saygısı, Aile ve Arkadaşlardan Sağlanan Sosyal Destek: Üniversite Öğrencileriyle Yapılan Bir Çalışma.(Unpublished Master Thesis). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

  43. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. & Collins, W. A. (2003). Autonomy development during adolescence. In G. R. Adams and M. Berzonsky (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescence (pp. 175-204). Oxford: Blackwell.

  44. Heppner, P. P., Wampold, B. E. ve Kivlighan, D. M., Jr. (2013). Psikolojik Danışmada Araştırma Yöntemleri (D. M. Siyez, Çev.) (1. bs.). Ankara: Mentis Yayıncılık.

  45. Aydın, A. ve Tekinsav-Sütçü, S. (2007). Ergenler için sosyal kaygı ölçeğinin (ESKÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin incelenmesi. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 14(2), 79-89.

  46. Fraenkel, J. R. ve Wallen, N. E. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

  47. Erkuş, A. (2009). Davranış Bilimleri için Bilimsel Araştırma Süreci. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

  48. Musaağaoğlu, C. (2004). Ergenlik sürecinde özerkliğin gelişlimi ile algılanan ana-baba tutumları arasındaki ilişkiler.(Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

  49. Çalışkan T, Çınar S. (2012). Akran Desteği: Geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması. Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2(1): 1-7.

  50. Palancı, M. (2004). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Kaygı Problemlerini Açıklama ve Gidermeye Yönelik Gerçeklik Terapisi Oryantasyonlu Bir Yardım Programının Geliştirilmesi. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

bottom of page