Redundancy and Economy as a Dialectical Manifestation of Language Units
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 18 March 2023

Redundancy and Economy as a Dialectical Manifestation of Language Units

Isayeva Safura Ilgar Gizi

Western Caspian University

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.06.01.726

Pages: 529-536

Keywords: Economy, Redundancy, Language System, Tendency, Speech

Abstract

This article deals with the principles of redundancy and economy as a dialectical manifestation of language units. In language, the principles of excess and economy form a dialectical unity. The ratio of economy and redundancy depends on the morphological structure of the language, the functioning of its elements, the analyzed level, the duality of language units, etc. What appears as surplus from one point of view is perceived as economy from another; often those that are redundant in content are considered economical in expression. In order to correctly assess the role and place of the principle of economy in the development and functioning of the language, it is necessary to investigate what the essence of this principle is, its source and the means of its implementation in the language. The study investigated that the principle of economy is universal, that is, it acts as one of the main reasons for changes in all languages. The study concluded that the principles of economy and redundancy help to reveal the essence of the most important processes of language activity. It is necessary to see the manifestation of economy not only where the language "shrinks", but also where it "expands".

References

  1. Abdullayev, K.M. (1998). Theoretical problems of Azerbaijani language syntax / K.M.Abdullayev. - Baku: Maarif, 281 p.

  2. Baudouin de Courtenay, I.A. (1963). Selected works on general linguistics. M.,

  3. Davydov, V.A.2. Space and fundamental science: state and prospects [Electronic resource] / V.A. Davydov, Yu.N. Makarov // Earth and Universe. - 2010. - No. 2. - Access mode: http://earth-and-universe.narod.ru

  4. Filippova, I.N. (2011). Classification of verbal redundancy // Vestnik MGOU. Series "Linguistics". No. 1 - P. 150-156.

  5. Grudeva, E.V (2008). Text redundancy, reduction and ellipsis. Abstract diss. ... doc. philol. Sciences. SPb., 342 p.

  6. Gleason G. (2008). Introduction to descriptive linguistics. М,

  7. Hunnicutt Sh. (2016). Intelligibility Versus Redundancy- Conditions of Dependency, Sage journals, Language and Speech, Vol.28, Issue 1.

  8. Hoffmann T. (2017). Construction Grammars. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 45 p.

  9. Hasanova, K.N. (2021). Manifestation of economy in prose texts at the phonomorphological level. // K.N. Hasanova. Linguistic problems. International scientific journal. - Baku, No. 2, - p. 138-144.

  10. Martinet A. (1987). Principles of economy in phonetic changes. / A. Martinet, - Moscow, 1960, -263 p.

  11. Maslov, Yu.S. (1987). Introduction to linguistics. M.,

  12. Mechkovskaya, N. B. (2003). Common linguistics: Structural and social typology.

  13. Paul G. (1960). Principles of language history. M.

  14. Passy, P.P. (1906). Petite Phonetique Comparee (Classic Reprint): Des Principales Langues Europeennes, Harvard University, 132 p.

  15. Pierce, Ch.S. (2001). Criticism and semiotics. Novosibirsk: Iteya, 110 p.

  16. Susov, I.P. (2001). Activity, consciousness, discourse and language system // -Kaliningrad: Language communication: processes and units. – 1988, – p. 7-13.

  17. Susov, I.P., (2006). Introduction to language knowledge. М.

  18. Serebrennikov, B.A. (1974). Probabilistic substantiations in comparative studies. / B.A. Serebrennikov, Moscow.

  19. Shannon K. (1963). Theory of communication in secret systems / / Shannon K. Works on the theory of information and cybernetics. M.

  20. Shannon, C. E. (1951). Prediction and Entropy of Printed English / / The Bell System Technical Journal Vol.30. №1.

  21. Trubetzkoy, N.S. (1969). Principles of Phonology. The Center for Research in Languages, 352 p.

  22. Uldall, X. И. (1960). Basics of glossematics / / New in linguistics. M., Issue 1.

  23. Yusifov, M.I. (1976). Economy in language system (on Azerbaijani language materials) dissertation submitted for the degree of philologist.e.nam. / M.I. Yusifov, -Baku, 169p.

  24. Zinder, L.R. (1979). General phonetics. M.,

  25. Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge,

  26. Zhukova, L.K., Kotov B.S. (2006). Some aspects of acronyms in computer terminology. In Culture of the peoples of the Black Sea region, 76, p. 42-46.

bottom of page