Education Quarterly Reviews
ISSN 2621-5799
Published: 30 April 2021
Review on Montessori Educators’ Opinions Concerning the Digital Assessment Tool They Use in Terms of 21st-Century Skills
Fatma Merve Şimşek, Mehmet Nur Tuğluk
Yildiz Technical University, Turkey
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.247
Pages: 291-306
Keywords: Montessori Education, Digitalization, Digital Assessment Tools, 21st-Century Assessment, Early Childhood, Phenomenology
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the opinions of Montessori educators on the digital assessment tool they use in terms of 21st-century teacher skills. The study sample covered 14 Montessori educators working in early childhood classes in public and private preschool educational institutions, located in Barcelona and Istanbul, where the Montessori educational approach is applied. In the study, the experiences of the Montessori educators with the digital assessment tool they use as the assessment tool were examined in terms of the identified 21st-century teacher skills. To this end, the research was designed with a phenomenological approach in the qualitative research method. The data were obtained through the personal information form and structured interview questions prepared for the digital assessment tool used by the Montessori educators. In the analysis of this data, the phenomenological study of Moustakas (1994) was introduced through the steps of the analysis. The perspectives of the Montessori educators concerning digital assessment, their application experiences regarding the digital assessment tool, and their views on their experiences were discussed in terms of utilization of the digital tool applications, as well as to use and evaluate information, their skills regarding collaborative work and communication, and finally their communication skills with the parents, which are among the 21st-century teacher skills. It was concluded that different factors influenced the opinions of the Montessori educators, where there were positive and negative expressions within the scope of these skills regarding the digital assessment tool.
References
Büyükgöncü, N. (2013). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında uygulanan bireyi tanıma tekniklerinin öğretmen görüşü açısından değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri.
Carr, M. (2001). Assessment in early childhood settings: Learning stories. Sage.
Cilesiz, S. (2011). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: Current state, promise, and future directions for research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (Fourth edition). SAGE.
Durakoğlu, A. (2010). Maria Montessori’ye göre çocuğun doğası ve eğitimi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Feld, J. K., & Bergan, K. S. (2002). Assessment Tools in the 21st Century--Considering Options for Assessment. Child Care Information Exchange, 146, 62-66.
Featherstone, S. (2013). Catching them at it!: Assessment in the early years. A&C Black.
Gutek, G. L. (2004). The Montessori method: the origins of an educational innovation: including an abridged and annotated edition of Maria Montessori's The Montessori method. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Heritage, M. (2018). Assessment for learning as support for student self-regulation. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 51-63.
Isaacs, B. (2007). Bringing the Montessori approach to your early years practice. Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10228441
Isaacs, B. (2010). Bringing the Montessori approach to your early years practice (2nd ed). Routledge.
Isaacs, B. (2018). Understanding the Montessori approach: Early years education in practice (Second edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Kramer, R. (2017). Maria Montessori: a biography. Diversion Books.
Lacina, J. (2006). Technology in the classroom: Virtual record keeping: should teachers keep online grade books?. Childhood Education, 82(4), 252-254.
Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2010). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice (Vol. 28). John Wiley & Sons.
Marion, M. (1981). Guidance of young children. Mosby.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Sage publications.
Migliorino, N. J., & Jeffrey, M. (2004). Educator attitudes toward electronic grading software. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 193-212.
Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. [12.12.2020]. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı. Ankara: MEB.
Miretzky, D. (2004). The communication requirements of democratic schools: Parent-teacher perspectives on their relationships. Teachers College Record, 106(4), 814-851
McAfee, O. D., & Leong, D. J. (1997). Assessing and guiding young children's development and learning. Allyn & Bacon, A Viacom Company, 160 Gould St., Needham Heights, MA 02194; Internet: www. abacon. com.
Montessori, M. (1991). The Advanced Montessori method: scientific pedagogy as applied to the education of children from seven to eleven years. Clio.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications..
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). (2009). Aistear: The early childhood curriculum framework
Neumann Michelle M, Jason L. Anthony, Noe Erazo, David L. Neumann. 2019. Assessment and Technology: Mapping Future Directions in the Early Childhood Classroom. In Fronteries in Education. c. 4:116.
Özçelik-Demirel, Ayşe, Kübra, Eke. 2019. Eğitimde ve Endüstride 21. Yüzyıl Becerileri. ed. Ayşe Özçelik-Demirel, Mehmet Nur Tuğluk. Ankara: Pegem Yayınevi:137-159
Poyraz, H., & Dere, H. (2003). Principles and methods of preschool education. Ankara: Anı Publications.
Seril, L. A. (2015). Communicating Effectively with Parents in the Montessori Environment.
Slentz, K. L. (2008). A guide to assessment in early childhood: Infancy to age eight. Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Washington.
Taşgın, A. (2019). Eğitimde ve Endüstride 21. Yüzyıl Becerileri. ed. Ayşe Özçelik-Demirel, Mehmet Nur Tuğluk. Ankara: Pegem Yayınevi:137-159
Transparent Clasroom. [11.11.2020]. Tutorials. Transparent Clasroom. https://www.transparentclassroom.com/tutorials?locale=en.
Tuğluk, M. N., & Özkan, B. (2019). MEB 2013 Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programının 21. yüzyıl becerileri açısından analizi. Temel Eğitim, 1(4), 29-38.
Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (Second Edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Voogt, Jockey,Natelia, Pareja Roblin. 2010. 21st-century skills. Discussion Paper. Zoetermeer: The Netherlands: Kennisnet. c. p.23 3:2000.
Wentworth, R. A. L. (1999). Montessori for the New Millennium. “Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.” Alıntı: Wentworth, Roland A. Lubienski. “Montessori for the New Millennium.” Apple Books.
Wortham, S. C. (2014). Assessment in early childhood education. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9781292056074.
Yüksel, P., & Yıldırım, S. (2015). Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish online journal of qualitative inquiry, 6(1), 1-20.