Understanding of Global Citizenship among Higher Education Teachers: Implications for Graduate Attributes
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 08 November 2021

Understanding of Global Citizenship among Higher Education Teachers: Implications for Graduate Attributes

Pham Thi Thuy Trang

Van Lang University, Vietnam

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.04.384

Pages: 200-210

Keywords: Global Citizenship, Global Citizenship Education, Teacher Training, Graduate Attributes, Educational Outcomes

Abstract

Global Citizenship (GC) has recently claimed its position as desired graduates’ attribute in many Higher Education (HE) institutions in different non-Western contexts. However, ambiguity and complexity still linger over what GC means contextually and how this understanding may shape educational outcomes. Taking cognizance of this, a study was carried out to investigate the understanding of GC among Vietnamese HE teachers as major agents in Global Citizenship Education (GCE), in order to discuss their implications for graduate attributes. This study adopted purposeful sampling strategy to conduct in-depth interviews among 14 teachers from 4 different faculties of a private university in Southern Vietnam. Emergent themes were then compared with GC conceptions theorized in the literature. Data analysis revealed a three-fold dimensions in teachers’ perception: (1) GC understanding was ambiguous and divergent and uniquely nuanced by personal and contextual factors, (2) triple helix of GC conceptions were intricately entwined in GCE rationales, and (3) GC notion was framed with juxtapositions of conceptions. The findings highlighted an implementation gap in GCE which might subvert the intended educational aim, especially in the context of unavailable official documents to guide GCE. In this way, the paper contributes to the ongoing discussion regarding GCE implementation, and indicates a need to have clearer instructional GCE-related policies and more comprehensive teacher trainings.

References

  1. Anderson, A. (2019). Advancing Global Citizenship Education Through Global Competence and Critical Literacy: Innovative Practices for Inclusive Childhood Education. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244019826000.

  2. Andreotti, V. (2006). Soft versus critical global citizenship education. In Development education in policy and practice(pp. 21-31). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

  3. Andreotti, V. (2015a). Critical and transnational literacies in international development and global citizenship education. Sisyphus - Journal of Education, 2(3), 32-50.

  4. Andreotti, V. (2015b). Global citizenship education otherwise: pedagogical and theoretical insights. In Decolonizing global citizenship education (pp. 221-229). Brill Sense.

  5. Arvanitakis, J., & Hornsby, D. (2016). Universities, the citizen scholar and the future of higher education. Springer.

  6. Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality.

  7. Borkovic, S., Nicolacopoulos, T., Horey, D., & Fortune, T. (2020). Students positioned as global citizens in Australian and New Zealand universities: A discourse analysis. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(6), 1106-1121.

  8. Bruce, J., North, C., & FitzPatrick, J. (2019). Preservice teachers’ views of global citizenship and implications for global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 17(2), 161-176.

  9. Campbell, C. J., & Walta, C. (2015). Maximising intercultural learning in short term international placements: Findings associated with orientation programs, guided reflection and immersion. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online),40(10), 1-15.

  10. Cho, H. S. (2016). The Gaps between Values and Practices of Global Citizenship Education: A Critical Analysis of Global Citizenship Education in South Korea.

  11. Çolak, K., Kabapınar, Y., & Öztürk, C. (2019). Social Studies Courses Teachers' Views on Global Citizenship and Global Citizenship Education. Egitim ve Bilim, 44(197).

  12. Cotton, D. R. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational research, 48(2), 223-241.

  13. Cotton, D. R., Morrison, D., Magne, P., Payne, S., & Heffernan, T. (2019). Global Citizenship and Cross-Cultural Competency: Student and Expert Understandings of Internationalization Terminology. Journal of Studies in International Education,23(3), 346-364.

  14. Dill, J. S. (2013). The longings and limits of global citizenship education: The moral pedagogy of schooling in a cosmopolitan age. Routledge.

  15. Dreamson, N. (2018). Culturally inclusive global citizenship education: Metaphysical and non-western approaches. Multicultural Education Review, 10(2), 75-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2018.1460896

  16. Dvir, Y., Shields, R., & Yemini, M. (2018). Three faces of global citizenship education: IB Schools’ self-representations in four local contexts. British Journal of Educational Studies, 66(4), 455-475.

  17. Evans, M., Ingram, L. A., MacDonald, A., & Weber, N. (2009). Mapping the “global dimension” of citizenship education in Canada: The complex interplay of theory, practice and context. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 17-34.

  18. Fendler, L., & Popkewitz, T. S. (1999). Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics. Routledge.

  19. Goren, H., Maxwell, C., & Yemini, M. (2019). Israeli teachers make sense of global citizenship education in a divided society-religion, marginalisation and economic globalisation. Comparative Education, 55(2), 243-263.

  20. Goren, H., & Yemini, M. (2016). Global citizenship education in context: Teacher perceptions at an international school and a local Israeli school. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(5), 832-853.

  21. Goren, H., & Yemini, M. (2017). The global citizenship education gap: Teacher perceptions of the relationship between global citizenship education and students’ socio-economic status. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 9-22.

  22. Horey, D., Fortune, T., Nicolacopoulos, T., Kashima, E., & Mathisen, B. (2018). Global citizenship and higher education: A scoping review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(5), 472-492.

  23. Hou, Y. (2020). Comparative Global Citizenship Education: A Critical Literature Analysis. Beijing International Review of Education, 2(4), 537-552.

  24. Jones, E., & Killick, D. (2013). Graduate attributes and the internationalized curriculum: Embedding a global outlook in disciplinary learning outcomes. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(2), 165-182.

  25. Kim, G. (2015). Global citizenship in the South Korean school geography curriculum: A post-structural perspective [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield].

  26. Kirk, S. H., Newstead, C., Gann, R., & Rounsaville, C. (2018). Empowerment and ownership in effective internationalisation of the higher education curriculum. Higher Education.

  27. Morais, D. B., & Ogden, A. C. (2011). Initial development and validation of the global citizenship scale. Journal of Studies in International Education,15(5), 445-466.

  28. Nguyen, L. A. (2017, February 8). Vietnam as a pioneer country in GCE. Global commons, 9-14.

  29. OECD. (2018). Preparing Our Youth for an Inclusive and Sustainable World: the OECD PISA Global Competence Framework. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/Handbook-PISA-2018-Global-Competence.pdf

  30. Oliver, B., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2018). Graduate attributes for 2020 and beyond: Recommendations for Australian higher education providers. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 821-836.

  31. Oxley, L., & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301-325.

  32. Pais, A., & Costa, M. (2020). An ideology critique of global citizenship education. Critical Studies in Education, 61(1), 1-16.

  33. Pashby, K., Costa, M., Stein, S., & Andreotti, V. (2020). A meta-review of typologies of global citizenship education. Comparative Education, 56(2), 144-164.

  34. Rapoport, A. (2010). We cannot teach what we don’t know: Indiana teachers talk about global citizenship education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 5(3), 179-190.

  35. Reilly, J., & Niens, U. (2014). Global citizenship as education for peacebuilding in a divided society: Structural and contextual constraints on the development of critical dialogic discourse in schools. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44(1), 53-76.

  36. Rizvi, F. (2009). Towards cosmopolitan learning. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 30(3), 253-268.

  37. Shultz, L. (2007). Educating for global citizenship: Conflicting agendas and understandings. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(3).

  38. Stein, S. (2015). Mapping global citizenship. Journal of College and Character, 16(4), 242-252.

  39. Thornberg, R., & Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, 5, 153-169.

  40. Truong-White, H., & Ho, T. N. (2020). Global Citizenship Education in Teacher Education in Asia: A Case Study From Vietnam. In Global Citizenship Education in Teacher Education (pp. 179-200). Routledge.

  41. Truong-White, H., & McLean, L. (2015). Digital Storytelling for Transformative Global Citizenship Education. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 38(2), n2.

  42. UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education: topics and learning objectives. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002329/232993e.pdf

  43. Veugelers, W. (2011). The moral and the political in global citizenship: Appreciating differences in education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3-4), 473-485.

  44. Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches: London. England: Continuum.

  45. Wright, C. (2012). Postcolonial cosmopolitanisms: towards a global citizenship education based on ‘divisive universalism’. In Postcolonial perspectives on global citizenship education (pp. 59-79). Routledge.

bottom of page