Influence of Masonry Infill Panels Mechanical and Physical Properties on the Seismic Performance of RC Frame
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Engineering and Technology Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2622-9374

Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.21 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.06 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.12 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.27 PM.png
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 10 May 2022

Influence of Masonry Infill Panels Mechanical and Physical Properties on the Seismic Performance of RC Frame

Horatiu-Alin Mociran

Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.5281/zenodo.6531449

Pages: 9-16

Keywords: Infill Panel, RC Frame, Mechanical Property, Diagonal Strut, Time History analysis

Abstract

The paper investigates numerically the influence of masonry infills properties on the seismic response of RC frame structures. A five-story plane RC frame with infill panels (benchmark), part of a residential building, situated in Piatra Neamț, was considered for this aim. The benchmark was designed according to the current design practice and based on current Romanian seismic design codes, thus the infills were modelled as uniformly distributed gravitational loads on beams. Two more cases of the same structure were examined: case 1, with infill panels made of hollowed ceramic blocks and case 2, with infills made of AAC. In both cases, infills panels were modelled through diagonal struts. Comparative nonlinear time history analyses of the structures were performed. In both cases, compared to benchmark, the results show that peak inter-story drift ratios, peak bending moments of columns and beams were reduced significantly, peak axial forces of columns had a small variations and base shears were slightly increased.

References

  1. Alwashali, H., Sen, D., Jin, K., & Maeda, M. (2019). Experimental investigation of influences of several parameters on seismic capacity of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame. Engineering Structures, 189, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.020

  2. Dautaj, A.D., Kadiri, Q., & Kabashi, N. (2018). Experimental study on the contribution of masonry infill in the behavior of RC frame under seismic loading. Engineering Structures, 165, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.013

  3. Dolce, M., & Goreti, A. (2015). Building damage assessment after the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13, 2241-2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9723-4

  4. Gaudio, C.D., Ricci, P., Verderame, G.M., & Manfredi, M. (2016). Observed and predicted earthquake damage scenarios: the case study of Pettino (L’Aquila) after the 6th April 2009 event. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14, 2463-2678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9919-2

  5. Fiore, A., Netti, A., & Monaco, P. (2012). The influence of masonry infill on the seismic behaviour of RC frame buildings. Engineering Structures, 44, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.023

  6. Mociran, H.A., & Cobîrzan, N. (2021a). Assessment of seismic performance of RC frame structure with masonry infill panels partially uncoupled from the surrounding frame members. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1138 (012029), doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1138/1/012029

  7. Mociran, H.A., & Cobîrzan, N. (2021b). Pushover analysis of R.C. framed structures with infill panels made of masonry having various properties. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1138 (012030) doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1138/1/012030

  8. Pallares, F.J., Davia, A., Hassan, W.M., & Pallares, L. (2021). Experimental and analytical assessment of the influence of masonry façade infills on seismic behavior of RC frame buildings. Engineering Structures, 235, 112031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112031

  9. Penelis, G.G, & Penelis, G.G. (2014). Concrete buildings in seismic regions. CRC Press.

  10. Peng, Q., Zhou, X., & Yang, C. (2018). Influence of connection and constructional details on masonry infilled RC frames under cyclic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 108, 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.02.009

  11. Perrone, D., Leone, M., & Aielo, M.A. (2017). Non-linear behaviour of masonry infilled RC frames: Influence of masonry mechanical properties. Engineering Structures, 150, 875-891.

  12. Romanian Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration. (2013). Seismic design code. Part I: Design rules for buildings(P100-1/2013).

  13. Romanian Standards Association. (2006). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings (SR EN 1992-1-1).

  14. Santos, S.P. (Eds.). (2007). Enclosure masonry wall systems worldwide. CRC Press.

  15. SAP 2000 educational version.

  16. SeismoMatch educational version.

  17. Trapani, F.D., Bolis, V., Basone, F., & Preti, M. (2020). Seismic reliability and loss assessment of RC frame structures with traditional and innovative masonry infills. Engineering Structures, 208, 110306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110306

bottom of page