Accounting Application over the Edgeworth Box to Assess Banking Activity in Southeast Asia Countries
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 15 February 2019

Accounting Application over the Edgeworth Box to Assess Banking Activity in Southeast Asia Countries

Miguel Ángel Pérez Benedito

Universidad de Valencia

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.02.01.65

Abstract

The manuscript considers that accounting information of financial statements is synthetic information of the process of decision-making, and the Edgeworth box is a laboratory to assess banking activity. The effects of decision-making process are explained by economic-financial models according to the principle of double entry. This model enables getting an accounting equilibrium equation with four variables which have economic and financial significance and can be represented in an Edgeworth bo by several transformations. The banking positions in the Edgeworth box visually explain levels of financial risk and their respective economic covertures according to the evolution of macroeconomic variables in Southeast Asian countries.

References

  1. Asian Developed Bank (ADB) (2018). Toward Optimal Provision of Regional Public Goods in Asiaand The Pacific Conference Highlights. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617 /TCS189599-2

  2. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2017). Banking on the Future of Asia And the Pacific. 50 Years of the Asian Development Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617 /TCS178907.

  3. Beenson, M. & Diex, T. (2018). Responding to crises: Europe and Southeast Asia. Asia Europe Journal. Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-018- 0505-x.

  4. Bank for lnternational Settlement (BIS) (2011). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Base/111: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. https://www. Bis.org/pub l/bcbs189. pdf

  5. Bank for lnternational Settlement (BIS) (2014). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Base/111 leverage ratio framework and disclosure requirements. www.bis.org.

  6. Bank for lnternational Settlement (BIS) (2017). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Base/111: Finalizing post-crisis reforms. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d344.pdf

  7. Bank for lnternational Settlement (BIS) (2018). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel 111 Monitoring Report. October 2018. http://www.bis.org/bcbs/qis/.

  8. Eurostat. European Commission (2013). European system of accounts ESA 2010. https:/f ec.europa.eu. http://dx.doi.org/10.2 785/16644.

  9. Financia! Stability Board (FSB) (2018). Global Shadow Banking Monitoring Report 2017. http://www. fs b .org/wp-conte nt/ u ploads/POS0318-1. pdf.

  10. lnternational Monetary Fund (IMF) (2018a). Regional economic outlook. Asia Pacific: good times, uncertain times, a time to prepare. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2018/05/ 08/NA050918-As ia-a nd-Pacific-Good-Ti mes-Unce rta in-Ti mes-A-Ti me-to-Prepare

  11. lnternational Monetary Fund. (IMF) (2018b). World Economic Outlook: Challenges to Steady Growth. Washington, DC, October. https://www.bookstore.imf.org/.

  12. Jacob, W. J., Neubauer, D., & Ye, H. (2018). Financing trends in Southeast Asia and Oceania: Meeting the demands of regional higher education growth. International Journal of Educational Development. 58. 47-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.11.001.

  13. Kranke, M., & Yarrow, D. (2018): The Global Governance of Systemic Risk: How Measurement Practices Tame Macroprudential Politics, New Political Economy, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13563467.2018.1545754

  14. OECD (2018), Economic Outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2018: Fostering Growth Through Digitalisation, OECD Publishing, Paris, http: j/dx.doi.org/9789264286184-en.

  15. Pérez-Benedito, M. A. (2015). The Accounting Analysis of Banking Company: The Case of CAM. Modern Economy, 2015, 6, 179-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/me.2015.62015.

  16. Rethel, L. (2019). Governed Interdependence, Communities of Practice and the Production of Capital Market Knowledge in Southeast Asia. New Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13563467. 2018.1563059.

  17. Rethel, L., & Thurbon, E. (2019). Introduction: Finance, Development and the State in East Asia. New Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1562435.

  18. Rüland, J. (2018). Coping with crisis: Southeast Asian regionalism and the ideational constraints of reform. Asia Europe Journal. 16:155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-018-0503-z.

  19. United Nations Statistic Division. ONU. (2019). System of National Accounts 2008-2008 SNA. https://unstats. un. org/unsd/nationa/account/sna2008.

  20. World Bank (WB) (2018). East Asia and Pacific economic update October 2018 Navigating Uncertainty. http:/ /dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1366-5

bottom of page