Bibliometric Analysis of Peer to Peer Lending Fintech Trends
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 08 October 2022

Bibliometric Analysis of Peer to Peer Lending Fintech Trends

Sita Nurhayati, Alni Rahmawati, Arni Surwanti

Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.05.04.454

Pages: 1-7

Keywords: Peer to Peer lending, Fintech, Bibliometric, VOSviewer

Abstract

This study aims to determine the development map of research related to "peer-to-peer lending." This research was conducted in December 2021-January 2022 by searching the Scopus database. The researcher uses the keywords “fintech,” “peer-to-peer lending,” crowdfunding” through Scopus and also Sci-hub to get some documents that are not free. In this study, bibliometric analysis uses software called VOSviewer to analyze the results. Based on the search results, the researchers obtained 27 scientific work search results which were then exported in CSV format and processed using VOSviewer. Based on the results of the analysis, this study shows that the keywords (co-occurrence) are divided into 4 clusters with a total of 29 topics. Through network visualization, It is shown that the relationship between nodes (edges) is shown by a line between nodes. The more lines of relationship between nodes, the closer the relationship between documents. Meanwhile, the density visualization shows that if the color visualized is yellow then the topic has been studied a lot and if it is green then the topic is still rarely studied.

References

  1. Abbasi, K., Alam, A., Brohi, N. A., Brohi, I. A., & Nasim, S. (2021). P2P lending Fintechs and SMEs’ access to finance. Economics Letters, 204, 109890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109890

  2. Ahelegbey, D. F., Giudici, P., & Hadji-Misheva, B. (2019). Factorial Network Models to Improve P2P Credit Risk Management. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2019.00008

  3. Awrey, D. (2013). Toward a supply-side theory of financial innovation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(2), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.03.011

  4. Bartoli, F., Ferri, G., Murro, P., & Rotondi, Z. (2013). SME financing and the choice of lending technology in Italy: Complementarity or substitutability? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(12), 5476–5485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.08.007

  5. Bastani, K., Asgari, E., & Namavari, H. (2019). Wide and deep learning for peer-to-peer lending. Expert Systems with Applications, 134, 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.042

  6. Bollaert, H., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021). Fintech and access to finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68(March), 101941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101941

  7. Chen, K. (2018). Financial innovation and technology firms: A smart new world with machines. International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, 25, 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571038620180000025012

  8. Cumming, D. J., Martinez-Salgueiro, A., Reardon, R. S., & Sewaid, A. (2021). COVID-19 bust, policy response, and rebound: equity crowdfunding and P2P versus banks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09899-6

  9. Darmansyah, Fianto, B. A., Hendratmi, A., & Aziz, P. F. (2020). Factors determining behavioral intentions to use Islamic financial technology: Three competing models. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(4), 794–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2019-0252

  10. Dorfleitner, G., Priberny, C., Schuster, S., Stoiber, J., Weber, M., de Castro, I., & Kammler, J. (2016). Description-text related soft information in peer-to-peer lending - Evidence from two leading European platforms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 64, 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.009

  11. Dospinescu, O., Dospinescu, N., & Agheorghiesei, D. T. (2021). Fintech services and factors determining the expected benefits of users: Evidence in romania for millennials and generation Z. E a M: Ekonomie a Management, 24(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-2-007

  12. Duarte, J., Siegel, S., & Young, L. (2012). Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Review of Financial Studies, 25(8), 2455–2483. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs071

  13. Giudici, P., Hochreiter, R., Osterrieder, J., Papenbrock, J., & Schwendner, P. (2019). Editorial: AI and Financial Technology. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2019.00025

  14. Han, A. S. (2021). Chinese fintech companies and their “going out” strategies. Journal of Internet and Digital Economics, 1(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/jide-07-2021-0003

  15. Hidajat, T. (2020). Unethical practices peer-to-peer lending in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2019-0028

  16. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0. In Acatech(Issue April). https://en.acatech.de/publication/recommendations-for-implementing-the-strategic-initiative-industrie-4-0-final-report-of-the-industrie-4-0-working-group/

  17. Leng, S. Y., Talib, A., & Gunardi, A. (2018). Financial Technologies: A Note on Mobile Payment. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 22(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v22i1.1993

  18. Lu, B., Hao, S., Pinedo, M., & Xu, Y. (2021). Frontiers in service science: Fintech operations-an overview of recent developments and future research directions. Service Science, 13(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1287/SERV.2021.0270

  19. Lunyakov, O. V., & Lunyakova, N. A. (2018). The development of credit channels in the transition to the digital economy: Demand modelling. Finance: Theory and Practice, 22(5), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-5-76-89

  20. Martínez-Climent, C., Zorio-Grima, A., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2018). Financial return crowdfunding: literature review and bibliometric analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0511-x

  21. Nasir, A., Shaukat, K., Khan, K. I., Hameed, I. A., Alam, T. M., & Luo, S. (2021). Trends and directions of financial technology (Fintech) in society and environment: A bibliometric study. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110353

  22. Nigmonov, A., Shams, S., & Alam, K. (2021). FinTech and macroeconomics: Dataset from the US peer-to-peer lending platform. Data in Brief, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107666

  23. Ruiqiong, G., & Junwen, F. (2019). An Overview Study on P2P Lending. Journal of Research in Business and Management, 7(2), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.3968/4801

  24. Saiedi, E., Mohammadi, A., Broström, A., & Shafi, K. (2020). Distrust in Banks and Fintech Participation: The Case of Peer-to-Peer Lending. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720958020

  25. Stern, C., Makinen, M., & Qian, Z. (2017). FinTechs in China – with a special focus on peer to peer lending. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 10(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCEFTS-06-2017-0015

  26. Suryanto, S., Rusdin, R., & Dai, R. M. (2020). Fintech as a catalyst for growth of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in Indonesia. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 1–12. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Fintech-as-a-Catalyst-for-Growth-of-Micro%2C-Small-in-Suryanto-Rusdin/ad92002a120fc275e7775120f928bb817473f91b

  27. Tao, Q., Dong, Y., & Lin, Z. (2017). Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9751-5

  28. Wang, Q., Xiong, X., & Zheng, Z. (2021). Platform Characteristics and Online Peer-to-Peer Lending: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 38(February), 101511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101511

  29. Xiang, D., Zhang, Y., & Worthington, A. C. (2021). Determinants of the use of fintech finance among chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(6), 1590–1604. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2989136

  30. Yvonne, M. (2020). Scopus Indexing: Why all the Fuss?IAFOR J. Educ. https://iafor.org/scopus-indexing-why-all-the-fuss/

bottom of page