Business Lobbying: A Systematic Literature Review
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 17 March 2024

Business Lobbying: A Systematic Literature Review

Bruno Perman Fernandes, Murillo Dias

Université of Bordeaux (France), Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.07.01.568

Pages: 181-193

Keywords: Business Lobbying, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

In this article, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) on Business Lobbying. Our objective was to map the evolution of the main theories over the past 124 years, by comparing them with COVID-19 literature from recent years. We extracted a total of 1,988 publication records from Google Scholar and Scopus using keyword searching, resulting in 3,174,947 citations. Based on these records, we performed a bibliometric analysis. A careful content analysis revealed that the scholarly research revolves mainly around three themes: (a) business lobby, (b) process, and (c) regional studies. The number of citations on business lobbying has multiplied seven-fold during the past 50 years and might double in the coming decades. Our article also suggests recommendations for future studies.

References

  1. Baumgartner, FR, & Leech, BL (2001). Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. The Journal of Politics, journals.uchicago.edu, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00106

  2. Baye, MR, Kovenock, D, & Vries, CG De (1993). Rigging the lobbying process: an application of the all-pay auction. The american economic review, JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117512

  3. Bernhagen, P, & Mitchell, NJ (2009). The determinants of direct corporate lobbying in the European Union. European Union Politics, journals.sagepub.com, https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116509103366

  4. Bertrand, M, Bombardini, M, & Trebbi, F (2014). Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. American Economic Review, aeaweb.org, https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.104.12.3885

  5. Beyers, J (2004). Voice and access: Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics, journals.sagepub.com, https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116504042442

  6. Bouwen, P (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research, Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00157.x

  7. Cheng, H., Clymer, J. W., Chen, B. P. H., Sadeghirad, B., Ferko, N. C., Cameron, C. G., & Hinoul, P. (2018). Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Surgical Research, 229, 134-144.

  8. Coen, D (1997). The evolution of the large firm as a political actor in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, Taylor &Francis, https://doi.org/10.1080/135017697344253

  9. Coen, D (1998). The European business interest and the nation state: large-firm lobbying in the European Union and member states. Journal of Public Policy, cambridge.org, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-public-policy/article/european-business-interest-and-the-nation-state-largefirm-lobbying-in-the-european-union-and-member-states/5EF7C4BDDD482630261803F9E54C79CF

  10. Coen, D (2007). Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy, Taylor &Francis, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701243731

  11. Coen, D, & Richardson, J (2009). Lobbying the European Union: institutions, actors, and issues., books.google.com, https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NBlXzej9stkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=business+lobbying&ots=ouog2kbTtn&sig=TAhtUeU_cLGjuxF4Vu5lBRi8X3k

  12. Cohen, L., & Malloy, C. J. (2014). Friends in high places. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(3), 63–91.

  13. Cycles and Microeconomics. International Journal of Applied Science, 7(1), 18-33; https://doi.org. 10.5281/zenodo.10566368

  14. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D. (2009) Producing a systematic review. In: The Sage handbook of organisational research methods(pp. 671–689). Sage.

  15. Denzin, N.K. (2001). Interpretive Interactionism (2nd Ed.) Sage.

  16. Dias, M., Lafraia, J.,Schmitz, T. & Vieira, P. (2023). Systematic Literature Review on Negotiation & Conflict Management. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 1(3), 20-31; https://doi.org.10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(3).03

  17. Dias, M., Pereira, L., Vieira, P., Barbosa, L., Quintão, H., Lafraia, J. (2023) Mediation & Dispute Board Resolution: A Systematic Literature Review. GPH-International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research,6(5), https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7952719

  18. Dias, M., Vieira, P., Pereira, L., Quintão, H., Lafraia, J. (2023) Leadership Theories: A Systematic Review Based on Bibliometric and Content Analysis. GPH-International Journal of Business Management, 6(5), 1-16; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7937272

  19. Dias, M., Vivanco, L., Teixeira, E. (2024) A Systematic Literature Review on Business Cycles and Microeconomics. International Journal of Applied Science, 7(1), 18-33; https://doi.org. 10.5281/zenodo.10566368

  20. Dias, M., Pereira, L; Vieira, P., Pan, Juliana (2022) From Plato to e-Leaders: The Evolution of Leadership Theories and Styles. Economics and Business Quarterly Reviews, 5 (2), 133-146, https://doi.org/ 10.31014/aior.1992.05.02.420

  21. Doner, RF, & Schneider, BR (2000). Business associations and economic development: Why some associations contribute more than others. Business and politics, cambridge.org, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-and-politics/article/business-associations-and-economic-development-why-some-associations-contribute-more-than-others/80BFA7537971DEE48B0143A253103BB4

  22. Drope, JM, & Hansen, WL (2006). Does firm size matter? Analyzing business lobbying in the United States. Business and Politics, cambridge.org, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-and-politics/article/does-firm-size-matter-analyzing-business-lobbying-in-the-united-states/E42D18249C89D6AE473AE1C210447A05

  23. Dür, A (2008). Measuring interest group influence in the EU: A note on methodology. European Union Politics, journals.sagepub.com, https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116508095151

  24. Frye, T. (2002). Capture or exchange? Business lobbying in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 54(7), 1017-1036.

  25. Goyal, K., Kumar, S. (2020) Financial literacy: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Consum.Stud. 45(1), 80–105

  26. Gullberg, A. T. (2008). Lobbying friends and foes in climate policy: The case of business and environmental interest groups in the European Union. Energy Policy, 36(8), 2964-2972.

  27. Hall, RL, & Deardorff, AV (2006). Lobbying as legislative subsidy. American Political Science Review, cambridge.org, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/lobbying-as-legislative-subsidy/AE4B5D8AB9C2487BB78C2A51BB53E03F

  28. Harmon, N., Fisman, R., & Kamenica, E. (2018). Peer effects in legislative voting [The Institute for Economic Development Working Paper Series dp-304]. Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston, MA.

  29. Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Research the Research Imagination. Sage, 2nd Edition.

  30. Liggett, TM (1999). Stochastic interacting systems: contact, voter and exclusion processes., books.google.com, https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=z-UJcQxwv4EC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=business+lobbying&ots=SkVnPHDOvE&sig=_PzafYjWf14Y6Pqn6D_0VpfUuB8

  31. Lowery, D. (2007). Why do organized interests Lobby? A multi-goal, multi-context theory of lobbying. Polity, 39(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300077

  32. Mahoney, C (2007). Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy, cambridge.org, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-public-policy/article/lobbying-success-in-the-united-states-and-the-european-union/B824B88B08895B8B316A37647F3CF6B3

  33. Mitra, D (1999). Endogenous lobby formation and endogenous protection: a long-run model of trade policy determination. American Economic Review, aeaweb.org, https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.89.5.1116

  34. Perman, Bruno (2024) Factors Influencing Business Lobbying: The Case of Brazil [Doctoral dissertation, Université de Bordeaux].

  35. Prashar, A., Sunder M.V. (2020) A bibliometric and content analysis of sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 245, 118665.

  36. Santos, M. L., Mancuso, W. P., Baird, M. F., & Resende, C. A. D. S. (2017). Lobbying no Brasil: profissionalização, estratégias e influência.

  37. Singh, S., Walia, N. (2020) Momentum investing: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Manag. Rev. Q. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11301- 020- 00205-6

  38. Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. John Wiley.

  39. Utting, P (2005). Corporate responsibility and the movement of business. Development in practice, Taylor &Francis, https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520500075797

  40. Victor, J. N., & Ringe, N. (2009). The social utility of informal institutions: caucuses as networks in the 110th U.S. House of Representatives. American Politics Research, 37(5), 742–766.

  41. Woll, C. (2008). Firm interests: How governments shape business lobbying on global trade. Cornell University Press.

  42. Zahoor, N., Al-Tabbaa, O.: Inter-organisational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: a systematic review and future research directions. Scand. J. Manag. 36(2), 101109 (2020)

bottom of page