Conceptualizing E-commerce Strategy as a Tool for Internationalization Performance
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 25 November 2023

Conceptualizing E-commerce Strategy as a Tool for Internationalization Performance

Joy D.M. Alokpo, James M. Kilika

Kenyatta University, Kenya

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.06.04.544

Pages: 140-159

Keywords: E-commerce Strategy, Firm’s Dynamic Capabilities, Internationalization Performance

Abstract

We are currently living in an extremely volatile business environment emanating from accelerated changes in technology. This condition compels firms’ Top managements to strategically think so as to adapt to such environmental shifts. In consequence, strategies built towards their internationalization goal are essential for their subsistence. They include e-commerce strategies and relevant dynamic capabilities. Being thus enlightened, the study endeavors to conceptualize E-commerce strategy as a tool for Internationalization Performance. However, a stumbling block was identified. It pertained to the lack of clear and exhaustive definitions of the main constructs, and to the scantiness and inadequacy of theories essential to their underpinning. The study also includes a comprehensive conceptual review touching the subjects of E-commerce strategy, Firm’s Dynamic Capabilities, and Internationalization Performance and furthermore included relevant empirical studies. The major constructs were grounded on theories like UTAUT, the theory of flow, the institutional theory, the resourced-based view and the Uppsala model. As a result of this extensive study, a case for a new theoretical framework was presented, designed and thoroughly explained. Future studies should concentrate on offering thorough definitions of e-commerce strategy and internationalization performance. Additionally, it is vital such research be conducted in a variety of contexts.

References

  1. Augier, M., Teece, D.J. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. Management International Review. 47(2):175–192.

  2. Barkley, D. L., Markley, D. M., & Lamie, D. R. (2007). E-Commerce as a Business Strategy: Lessons Learned from Case Studies of Rural and Small Town Businesses. UCED Working Papers (pp 112895).

  3. Barnes-Vieyra, P., & Claycomb, C. (2001). Business-to-business E-commerce: models and managerial decisions. Business Horizons. doi:10.1016/s0007- 6813(01)80030-6

  4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108

  5. Breznik, L., & Lahovnik, M. (2015). Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage: Findings from case study. Management, 21(Special Issue):167-185.

  6. Bush, V.D., Vorhies, D.W. and Orr, L.M. (2011) .Improving customer-focused marketing capabilities and firm financial performance via marketing exploration and exploitation. Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 39(5):.736–756.

  7. BusinessDictionary. (2019). Business Dictionary. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from www.BusinessDictionary.com: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/performance.html

  8. BusinessDictionary. (2019). What is technological environment? definition and meaning. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from Business Dictionary: http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/technological-environment.html

  9. Business Sweden. (2017). International sustainable Business sustainability Report for The Financial Year 2017.

  10. Capron , L., Dussauge, P., & Mitchell , W. (1998). Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988-1992.Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199807)19:7<631::aid-smj963>3.0.co;2-9.

  11. Cavusgil, S., & Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy – performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58:1-21.

  12. Chetty, S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2004). A Strategic Approach to Internationalization: A Traditional Versus a “Born-Global” Approach. Journal of International Marketing. doi:10.1509/jimk.12.1.57.25651

  13. Clark, K., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industries. Harvard Buiness School Press.

  14. Corbitt, B. (2000). Developing intraorganizational electronic commerce strategy: an ethnographic study. Journal of Information Technology, 15(2):119-130.

  15. Delios, A., & Beamish , P. W. (2001). Survival and Profitability: The Roles of Experience and Intangible Assets in Foreign Subsidiary Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5):1028-1038.

  16. Dima, S. C. (2010).From International Trade to Firm Internationalization. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3.

  17. Dougherty, D. (1992). A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131007

  18. Evans, J. R., & King, , E. V. (1999). Business-to-business marketing and the world wide web: Planning, managing, and assessing websites. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(4):343–358.

  19. FAHY, J. (2022). A resource-based analysis  of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment. International Business Review,  11:57-78.

  20. Fensterseifer, J. E. (2009). St (FAHY, 2022)strategic Resources  and Sustainability of Competitive Advantages in Industrial Clusters: Towards a  General Analytical Framework. Encontro  Da ANPAD, 19-23.

  21. Fruhling, A. L., & Digman, L. A. (2000). The impact of electronic commerce on business-level strategies. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 1(1).

  22. Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. G. (2001). A Resource Perspective of Global Dynamic Capabilities. 32(3):597–606.

  23. Griffith, D., & Palmer, W. J. (1999). Leveraging the web for corporate success. Business Horizons, 42(1): 3-10.

  24. Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal.doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199905)20:5<397::aid-smj35>3.0.co;2-k.

  25. User SurveysiSurvevs-1998. GVU's WWW User Surveys. Retrieved September 28, 2023, from https://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/User_Survey_Home.html

  26. Hansen, T. M. (1999, March). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 82-111.

  27. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, I. R. (1997). Technology Brokering And Innovation In A Product Development Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 716-749.

  28. Helfat, C., & Raubitschek, S. R. (2000). Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 961-979.

  29. Helfat, E. C. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of r&d. Strategic Management Journal.doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199705)18:5<339::aid-smj883>3.0.co;2-7

  30. Helfat, E. C., & Peteraf, A. M. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path. . Strategic Organization. doi:10.1177/1476127008100133

  31. Helfat, E. C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, A. M., & Singh, G. S. (2007). ) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Maiden. MA: Blackwell.

  32. Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, (15): 63-84.

  33. Henderson, J., Dooley, F., & Akridge, J. (2000). Adoption of e-commerce strategies for Agribusiness firms. American agricultural economics association annual meeting.

  34. Heredero, C. d., & Corces, J. M. (2015). The internationalization of Spanish SMEs from the theory of dynamic capabilities: A new management structure proposal that relates the creation of competitive advantage with the key factors that drive the process. Market Economics and Business Journal, 46(3): 169-186.

  35. Jan Johanson & Jan-Erik Vahlne(1977). The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32

  36. Jan Johanson & Jan-Erik Vahlne(2006). Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: A note on the Uppsala internationalization process model. Management International Review, 46(2):165–178

  37. Jeong, S. W. (2016). Types of foreign networks and internationalization performance of Korean SMEs. Multinational Business Review. doi:10.1108/mbr-08-2015-0039

  38. Johanson, J. and Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975) The Internationalization of the Firm—Four Swedish Cases. The Journal of Management Studies. doi10.1111/j.1467- 6486.1975.tb00514.x

  39. Kambil .A. (1995). Electronic commerce: implications of the Internet for business practice and strategy. Business Economics, 30 (1995): 27-33

  40. Keh, H.T., Nguyen, T.T.M. and Ng, H.P. (2007), “The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs”. Journal of Business Venturing,22(4):592–611.

  41. Knight, G.A. and Cavusgil, S.T. (2004).Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born global firm. Journal of International Business Studies,35(4):124–141.

  42. LaBarre, J. E., Haugen, S., & Noe, J. J. (2001). A case study analysis of e-commerce strategies for retail businesses. IACIS .

  43. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097- 0266(199805)19:5<461::aid-smj953>3.0.co;2-l.

  44. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). 'Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development', Strategic Management Journal, 13, Summer Special Issue,111-125

  45. Li, H. and Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001), “Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China”, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6),1123-1134.

  46. Lu, J.W. and Beamish, P.W. (2001) The Internationalization and Performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 565-586. doi:10.1002/smj.184

  47. Luo, Y., Hongxin Zhao, J., & Du, J. (2005). The internationalization speed of e-commerce companies: an empirical analysis. International Marketing Review. doi:10.1108/02651330510630294

  48. Mashahadi, F., Ahmad, N. H., & Mohamad, O. (2016). Strategic innovation ambidexterity and the internationalization performance of small and medium enterprises. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development.doi:10.1108/wjemsd-09-2015-0036.

  49. Mamoun Benmamoun, Nitish Singh, Kevin Lehnert, Sang Bong Lee.(2018). Internationalization of e-commerce corporations (ECCs): Advanced vs emerging markets ECCs. Multinational Business Review.doi:10.1108/MBR-02-2018-0010

  50. Melin, L. (1992). Internationalization as a strategy process. Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/smj.4250130908

  51. Meskhia, I., & Shaburishvili, S. (2015). Basics of researche of the technological environment of business. administracja Zarzadzanie, 107.

  52. Mudalige, D., Ismail, N. A., & Malek, M. M. (2017). (2017). Application of theory of dynamic capabilities to explicate Internationalization of smes in sri lankaI. PBJ , 8(2): 1-18.

  53. Mun, H. J. (2018). The home country boundness of technological resources and internationalization performance. Management Decision. doi:10.1108/md-05-2017-0496

  54. Nel, D., van Niekerk, R., Berhon, J.-P. and Davies, T. (1999).Going with the Flow: Web Sites and Customer Involvement. Internet Research: Electronic Networkine Atmlications and Policv.

  55. Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C.& Chen, M. J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal,28: 935–955.

  56. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). The concept of flow. In Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Ed.). Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press, 89-105.

  57. Nanehkaran, Y. A. (2013). An Introduction to Electronic Commerce. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 2(4):190-193.

  58. Naranjo-Valencia, J.C., Jiménez-Jiménez, D. and Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision, 49(1):55-72.

  59. Karagozoglu, N., Lindell, M. (2004).Electronic commerce strategy, operations, and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. doi:10.1108/14626000410551555

  60. Newbert, S.L. (2007) Empirical Research on Resource Based View of the Firm: An Assessment and Suggestions for Future Research. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 121-146.

  61. Singh N.,& Kundu, S.(2002). Explaining the Growth of E-Commerce Corporations (ECCs): An Extension and Application of the Eclectic Paradigm. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(4):679–697

  62. Olsson, E.-K. (2014). Crisis Communication in Public Organisations: Dimensions of Crisis Communication Revisited. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management.doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12047

  63. Patton M. A., & Jøsang A., (2004). Technologies for Trust in Electronic Commerce. Electronic Commerce Research , 4(1–2): 9–21.

  64. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1): 116-145.

  65. McDougall, P.P., Shane S.,& Oviatt B.M.,(1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6): 469-487.

  66. Protogerou, A.; caloghirou, Y.; Lioukas, S (2012) . Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21 (3):615-647

  67. Grant, R.M., (2006). Toward A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(2):109-122

  68. Rodríguez, L. J., & Rodríguez, G.R. M., (2005). Technology and export behaviour: A resource based view approach. International Business Review. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.07.002

  69. Rosen, A. (2000). The Commerce: A Survival Guide for Business Managers. (AMA Publications)

  70. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (1999). Beyond Local Search: Boundary-Spanning, Exploration, and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4):287-306.

  71. Ruppel, Underwood-Queen, & Harrington. (2003). e-Commerce: The Roles of Trust, Security, and Type of e-Commerce Involvement. E-Service Journal. doi:10.2979/esj.2003.2.2.25

  72. Sekhar, S.C. (2001).E-commerce and two popular business level typologies: a comparative analysis. Global Competitiveness, 9 (1):525-43.

  73. Schneider, G. P., & Perry , J. T. (2000). Electronic Commerce: Excellence in information systems. Management Information Systems series , 7:408.

  74. Shoman, A. (1998). Export performance: a conceptualization and empirical assesment. Journal of International Marketing, 6(3): 59-81.

  75. Shahhoseini M. A.,& Ramezani K.(2015).Mediating Effect of Ambidexterity on Marketing Capability and Innovation Capability,in The Proceedings of the International Conference. Marketing-from Information to Decision, 80

  76. Suikki, R. (2007). Process renewal driven by disruptive technologies. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research. doi:10.1504/ijbir.2007.012112

  77. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal. doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105

  78. Tajpour, M., Hosseini, E., & Moghaddm, A. (2018). The Effect of Managers Strategic Thinking on Opportunity Exploitation. Scholedge International Journal of Multidisciplinary & Allied Studies. doi:10.19085/journal.sijmas050602

  79. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.

  80. Teece, D. J. (1982, March). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(1):39-63.

  81. Tiessen, James H. & Wright, Richard W. & Turner, Ian, 2001. A model of e-commerce use by internationalizing SMEs. Journal of International Management, 7(3):211-233.

  82. Trevino, L.K. and Webster, .I. (1992). Flow in computer mediated communication .Communication Research, 19:539-573.

  83. Vorhies, D.W. (1998). An investigation of the factors leading to the development of marketing capabilities and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6(5):3–24

  84. Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69:80–94.

  85. Powell, W. W., Koput K.W., & Smith-Doerr L. (1996). Inter-organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1):116-145.

  86. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4):303–313.

  87. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2):171– 180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207

  88. Wheeler, C.(2002).NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net. Yoon, K. C. and Kim, Y. L. (2009). A study of the business performance and degree of globalization of Korean venture enterprises. International Business Journal, 20 (2): 29-63.

  89. Zahra, S. A. and George, G. (2002) .Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185-203.

bottom of page