Effects of Strategic Orientation on Performance of Telecommunication Sector in Nigeria
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 20 September 2021

Effects of Strategic Orientation on Performance of Telecommunication Sector in Nigeria

Niyi Israel Akeke, Adenike Rita Akeke, Ayodeji Muyideen Awolaja, Mathew Olufemi Oyebanji

Ekiti State University (Nigeria), Adeniran Ogunsanya College of Education (Nigeria)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.04.03.383

Pages: 200-207

Keywords: Strategic Orientation, Technology Orientation, Market Orientation, Entrepreneurial Orientation, Performance

Abstract

The study explores the potential influences of strategic orientation constructs of entrepreneurial, market and technology orientations on telecommunication firms’ performance using data obtained through structured questionnaires from 57 line managers and 300 customers of these firms. The data collected were subjected to the structural equation modeling technique. The results revealed that strategic orientation has a positive significant relationship with firm performance. Specifically, it showed that only technology orientation has a significant influence on telecommunication firms’ performance. The study contributes to the understanding of the rationale behind which set of strategic orientations should be implemented for improved level of performance in the telecommunication sector.

References

  1. Avci, U., Madanoglu, M. & Okumus, F. (2011). Strategic orientation and performance of tourism firms: Evidence from a developing country. Tourism Management, 32, 147-157.

  2. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization science , 12 (1), 57-74

  3. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2009). The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 443-464.

  4. Balogun, J. (2000). Impact of GSM on economy and development. Centre for culture and technical interchange between East and West, Gwalada, Abuja

  5. Cadogan, J. W. (2012). International marketing, strategic orientation and business success: Reflections on the road ahead. International Marketing Review, 29(4), 340-348

  6. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37-52.

  7. Deutscher, F., Zapkau, F. B., Schwens, C., Baum, M. & Kabst, R.(2016). Strategic orientations and performance: A configurational perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 849-861.

  8. Ejdys, J. (2014). Strategic orientation of small and medium size enterprises. Economics and Management, 19(4), 346-368.

  9. Gatignon, H. & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90

  10. Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M. & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 451-465

  11. Gonzalez-Benito, O., Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Munoz-Gallego, P. A. (2009). Role of entrepreneurship and market orientation in firm’s success. European Journal of Marketing, 43,  500-522.

  12. Grawe, S. J., Chen, H. & Daugherty, P. J. (2009). The relationship between strategic orientation, service innovation, and performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 39, 282-300.

  13. Hakala, H.(2011). Strategic orientations in management literature: Three approaches to understanding the interaction between market, technology, entrepreneurial and learning orientations. International Journal of Management Reviews,13, 199-217.

  14. Hernaus, T., Bach, M. & Vuksic, V. (2012). Influence of strategic approach to BPM on financial and non-financial performance. Baltic Journal of Management, 7, 376-396.

  15. Ibrahim, M. & Shariff, M. N. M. (2016). Mediating role of access to finance on the relationship between strategic orientation attributes and SMEs performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(3), 473-496.

  16. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 53-70.

  17. Kreiser, P.M., Marino, L.D. & Weaver, K.M. (2002). Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the EO Scale: A Multicountry Analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 26 (4), 71–94.

  18. Laukkanen, T., Nagy, G., Hirvonen, S., Reijonen, H. & Pasanen, M. (2013). The effect of strategic orientations on business performance in SMEs A multigroup analysis comparing Hungary and Finland. International Marketing Review, 30(6),  510-535.

  19. Li, D. Y. & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793-2799

  20. Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-172.

  21. NBS. (2015). Nigeria Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria telecommunications sector summary report and the full year of 2015, 28thApril, 2016.

  22. Ndukwe, E. (2003). The role of telecommunication in national development. 9thOmolayole annual management lecture.

  23. Nkordeh, N., Bob-Manuel, I. & Olowononi, F. (2017). The Nigerian telecommunication industry: Analysis of the first 15years of the growth and challenges in the GSM market (2001-2016). Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 1, October, 25-27, San Fransisco, U.S.A

  24. Niven, P. R. (2002). Balanced scorecard, step-by-step: Maximising performance and maintaining results. John Willey & Sons

  25. Obeidat, B. Y. (2016). The effect of strategic orientation on organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Communications, Network and Systems sciences, 9, 478-505

  26. Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F. & Hult, G. T. (2005), The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 49-65.

  27. Panda, D. K. (2014). Managerial networks and strategic orientation in SMEs.Journal of Strategy and Management, 7, 376-397.

  28. Paranjape, B., Rositter, M. & Pantano, V, (2006). Insights from balanced scorecard performance measurement systems: successes, failures and future: a review. Managing Business Excellence, 10(3), 4-14

  29. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitve advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

  30. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.

  31. Reijonen, H., Hirvonen, S., Nagy, G., Laukkanen, T. & Gabrielsson, M. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on B2B branding and business growth in emerging markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 51, 35-46.

  32. Salojarvi, H., Ritala, P., Sainio, L.-M. & Saarenketo, S. (2015) Synergistic Effect of Technology and Customer Relationship Orientations: Consequences for Market Performance. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 30, 511-520.

  33. Sinkovics, R. & Roath, A. S. (2004). Strategic orientation, capabilities, and performance in manufacturer – 3PL relationships. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(2), 43-64.

  34. Slater, S. F., Olson, E. M. & Hult, T. M. (2006). The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 1221-1231.

  35. Smart, D. T. & Conant, J. S. (1994). Entrepreneurial orientation, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(3), 28-38.

  36. Teece, D. T., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 509-533

  37. Tutar, H., Nart, S. & Bingöl, D. (2015). The effects of strategic orientations on innovation capabilities and market performance: the case of ASE orientation of airports in Europe's peripheral areas. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(6). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 709-719.

  38. Vanguard Newspaper, May 2016.

  39. Zhou, K.Z & Li, C.B.(2010).How Strategic Orientations Influence the Building of Dynamic Capability in Emerging Economies. Journal of Business Research, 63, 224-231

bottom of page