Marketing Mix Factors of Educational Services, Accreditation Status, and Image Formation as Intervening Variables on Decisions in Choosing Private University in Palembang: Bina Darma University Palembang
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 23 November 2018

Marketing Mix Factors of Educational Services, Accreditation Status, and Image Formation as Intervening Variables on Decisions in Choosing Private University in Palembang: Bina Darma University Palembang

Yeni, Zakaria Wahab, Agustina Hanafi

Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.01.04.48

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out and analyze (1) the marketing mix towards the decision to choose Bina Darma University (2) the accreditation status towards the decision to choose Bina Darma University (3) The marketing mix towards image (4) the accreditation status toward image formation (5) the image toward decision to choose Bina Darma University. This study was conducted using descriptive and quantitative methods. SEM analysis was used and operated through the AMOS program. There were 300 students as the samples taken by using purposive sampling method based on suitable specific characteristics with the research objectives so that they were expected to answer research problems. The results of the study showed that (1) the marketing mix had a positive and significant effect on the decision to choose Bina Darma University (2) the accreditation status had a positive and significant effect on the decision to choose Bina Darma University (3) the marketing mix had a positive and significant effect on the image formation (4) the status accreditation had a positive and significant effect on the formation of image (5) the image had a positive and significant effect on the decision to choose Bina Darma University. It can be concluded that all proposed hypotheses were accepted.

References

  • Adnan, Ahmad Azrin. (2013). Theoretical Framework for Islamic Marketing: Do We Need a New Paradigm? InternationalJournal of Business and Social Science. 4(7), 157-165.

  • Alipour, et al. (2012), A New Educational Marketing Mix: The 6Ps For Private School Marketing in Iran, Research Journal of Applied sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(21),4314-4319.

  • Alma, Bukhari. (2005). Pemasaran Stratejik Jasa Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta

  • Alma, Bukhari. (2008). Pemasaran Jasa Pendidikan Yang Fokus Pada Mutu dalam Bukhari Alma & Ratih Hurriyati (Ed.) Manajemen Corporate & Strategi Pemasaran jasa pendidikan: Fokus Pada Mutu dan Layanan Prima. Bandung: Alfabeta.

  • Ancheh, Keling Stevenson B.(2006). Institutional Factors Attracting Students To Malaysian Institutions of Higher Education, International Review of Business Research Papers, 2(1), 46-64.

  • Arwanda, Nur Oktalia Dwine; Hartoyo; Sri Hartoyo. (2014). Kepuasan, Citra, dan Loyalitas pada Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi : Kasus di Akademi XYZ. Jur. Ilm. Kel. & Kons., 7(2), Mei 2014, p : 123-132

  • Arikunto, Suharsimi . 2014. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta.

  • Briggs, S. (2006). An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: The case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6).

  • Bambang S, dan Indriantoro, Nur, (2009), Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Edisi Pertama, BPFE,Yogyakarta.

  • Buchari Alma, (2012), Manajemen Pemasaran dan Pemasaran Jasa, Alfabeta, Bandung.

  • Butterick, Keith. (2011). Introduction Public Relations: Theory and Practice. Edisi terj. Nurul Hasfi, Pengantar Public Relations: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada,.

  • Chung-Kai Li & Chia-Hung Hung (2009). Marketing tactics and Parents’ Loyalty: The Mediating Role of School Image, Journal of Education   Administration, 47(4), 447-489.

  • David Schuller & Martina Rastinova, Marketing Communication Mix of Universities

  • Dharmmesta, Basu Swastha & Handoko, Hani . (2013). Manajemen Pemasaran: Analisis Perilaku Konsumen. Yogyakarta: BPFE. 202

  • Drewes, T & Michael, C. (2006). How Do Students Choose A University? An Analysis of Applications to Universities in Ontario, Canada, Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 781-800.

  • Ferdinand A.T. (2014). Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

  • Ferdinand A.T. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro : Semarang.

  • Ghozali, Imam. (2011). Model Persamaan Struktural: Konsep & Aplikasi Dengan program Amos 24. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

  • ______. 2012. Structural Equation Modeling: Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi dengan Program Lisrel 8.80. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

  • Haziliza Haron, et al. (2017). Students' Decision Factors in Choosing Private Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Academic Research and Social Science. 7(11), 1372-1382.

  • Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). ‘Universities in a Competitive Global Marketplace: a Systematic Review of the Literature on Higher Education Marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316-338 doi:10.1108/09513550610669176

  • Herren, Cathy D., Cartmell II, Dwayne & Robertson, Tanner (2011). Perception of Influence on College Choice by Students Enrolled in a College of  Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, NACTA Journal.

  • Honglian Yang. 2011. A Comparative Study of Corporate Image in the real Estate Industry in the City of Kunming China, Graduate School of Business and Economics Journal . 4(6), 141-155.

  • Ho, H. F., & Hung, Ch. Ch. (2008). Marketing mix formulation for higher education : An integrated analysis employing analytic hierarchy process, cluster analysis, and correspondence analysis. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(4), 328-340.

  • Hoyt, Jeff E. & Brown, Andrea B. 2003. Identifying College Choice Factors to Successfully Market Your Institution, Academic Journal Article College and Universit., 78(4), 3-10.

  • Husein, Umar. (2000). Riset Pemasaran dan Perilaku Konsumen. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

  • Hurriyati. R. (2009). Bauran Pemasaran dan loyalitas konsumen. Bandung. Alfabeta.

  • Ian G. Evans, (1995). Marketing for Schools. London : Cassell Education.

  • Ionela, George.C, Blaga, L. (2014). A Model of Students’ University Decision Making Behavior. Practical Application of Science, Issue 3 (5)

  • Ioan-Contantin (2011). Marketing Higher Education Using The 7PS Framework, Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 4 (53). No.1. Series    V: Economic Sciences. 23-30.

  • Irianto, Y. B. & Prihatin, E., (2011). Manajemen Pendidikan , Bandung: Alfabeta

  • Ivy, J. (2008). A New Tertiary Education Marketing Mix: The 7ps for Marketing, International Journal of education management, 22(4), 328-340.

  • Joseph Sia Kee Ming. (2010). Institutional Factors Influencing Students’ College Choice Decision in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(3), 53-57

  • Kallio, Ruth E. (1995). Factors in Influencing The College Choice Decisions of Graduate Students, Research in Higher Education, 36(1). 203

  • Khairani, A. Z. bin & Abd. Razak, Nordin bin. (2013). Assessing factors Influencing Students’ Choice of Malaysian Public University: A Rasch Model Analysis, International journal of Applied Psychology, 3(1): 19-24.

  • Kotler, P & Keller, L. (2012). Marketing Management, 14th edition. New Jersey:Prentice_Hall,Inc

  • Kristianto, P. L. (2003). Psikologi Pemasaran: Integrasi Ilmu Psikologi dalam Kegiatan Pemasaran. Yogyakarta: CAPS.

  • Kuncoro, E. A. (2008). Leadership Sebagai Primary Forces dalam Competitive Strength, Competitive Area, Competitive Result Guna meningkatkan Daya Saing Perguruan Tinggi,

  • Kusumawati, Andriani. (2013). A Qualitative Study of the Factors Influencing Student Choice: The Case of Public University in Indonesia, Journal of basic and Applied Scientific Research.3(1), 314-327.

  • Kompas.2011.PTS pun mulai diperhitungkan, diakses 12 Juni 2018https://sains.kompas.com/read/2011/05/03/ 16213461

  • Latan, Hengky. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling: Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

  • Lupiyoadi Rambat & Hamdani, A.(2006). Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa. Edisi dua. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

  • Marshall, Greg W & mark. W. Jhonston. (2010). Marketing Management. New York. McGraw-Hill.

  • Mehboob et al., (2012). Factors Influencing Student’s Enrollment Decisions in Selection of Higher Education Institutions (HEI’S), Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business. 4(5), 559-568.

  • Muhaimin, Suti’ah & Prabowo, (2010). Manajemen Pendidikan: Aplikasinya dalam Penyusunan Rencana Pengembangan Sekolah/Madrasah, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

  • Nimpoeno, John S. (1986). Laporan Penelitian tentang Tingkah Laku Konsumen. Bandung: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Padjadjaran.

  • Nicolescu, Luminita . (2009). Appliying marketing To Higher Education: Scope and Limits, Journal Management & Marketing. 4(2),35-44.

  • Obermeit, Katrin. (2012). Students’ Choice of Universities in Germany: Structure, Factors and Information Sources Used, Journal of Higher Education, 22(2), 206-230.

  • Oplatka, I., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2007), The Incorporation of Market orientation in The School Culture: an Essential Aspect of School Marketing, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 4.

  • Philip Kotler. (2002). MarketingManagement. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: Prenhallindo.

  • Prasetyo. H. (2014). Dampak Kebijakan Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi Terhadap Daya Saing (Competitiveness) Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Kabupaten Kebumen. Jurnal Fokus Bisnis , 13(1), Juli .

  • Rakhmat, Jalalludin . (1996). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja osdakarya.

  • Riduwan. 2005. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

  • Sabir, Raja Irfan et al. (2013). Factors Affecting University and Course Choice: A Comparison of Undergraduate Engineering and Business Students in Central Punjab, Pakistan, Journal Basic, and Applied Scientific Research. 3(10) 298-305.

  • Saleh, Muwafik. 2010. Public Service Communication. Malang; UMM Press.

  • Seno Aji Wahyono, Dr., MM & Susilawati, S.Kom., MM (2016). Pengaruh Bauran Promosi terhadap Kepercayaan dan Dampaknya terhadap Keputusan Mahasiswa Memilih Kuliah (studi kasus Politeknik LPKIA Kota Bandung). Jurnal Indonesia Membangun. 2(1).

  • Schoenfeld, G. & Bruce, G., (2005). School Brand Images And Brand Choices In MBA Programs, Graduate Management Admission Council Research Report. RR-05-10.

  • Schuller, D. & Chalupsky, V. (2011). Internal Marketing Communication of Higher Education Institutions, Journal Economics, And Management. 16, 1316-1322.

  • Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (6thed.). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Schiffman, Leon, Kanuk & Leslie Lazar (2007). Perilaku Konsumen. Diterjemahkan oleh Zoelkifli Kasip. Jakarta : Indeks.

  •  Schuller, D., & Rastinova, M. (2011). Marketing Communication Mix of Universities - Communication with Students in an Increasing Competitive University Environment. Journal of Competitiveness, issue 3, 58-71

  • Shah, Mahsood & Nair, Chenicheri S. (2010). Enrolling in Higher Education: The Perceptions of Stakeholders. Journal of Institutional Research 15(1), 9-15.

  • Sia Kee Ming, J., (2010).Institutional Factors Influencing Students’ College Choice Decision in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework., International Journal of Business and Social Science,  1(3). 53-58.

  • Singarimbun, M. 1999. Metode Penelitian Survai. Edisi Revisi.Jakarta: LP3S

  • Soedijati , E. K. & Pratminingsih, S. A., 2011. The Impact of Marketing Mix On Students Choice of University: Study case of Private University in Bandun.  2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research Proceeding.

  • Soedijati, E. K., (2008). Penerapan Konsep 7P sebagai Strategi Pemasaran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Bukhari Alma & Ratih Hurriyati (Ed.). Manajemen Corporate & Strategi Pemasaran jasa pendidikan: Fokus Pada Mutu dan Layanan Prima. Bandung: Alfabeta.

  • Soemirat Soleh, Ardianto Elvinaro (2010). Dasar-Dasar Publik Relations, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. 205

  • Solimun, M. S. (2002). Multivariate analysis. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Lisrel dan Amos,Aplikasi di Manajemen, Ekonomi pembangunan, Psikologi, Sosial, Kedokteran dan Agrokompleks. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

  • Sugiyono, (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif R&D Bandung: Alfabeta.

  • Sutina. (2003). Perilaku Konsumen dan Komunikasi Pemasaran, Bandung:PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset, Cet. Ke-3

  • Sugiyono, (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif R&D Bandung: Alfabeta.

  • Sutojo, S., (2004). Membangun Citra Perusahaan: Sebuah Sarana Penunjang keberhasilan Pemasaran. Jakarta: Damar Mulia Pustaka.

  • Tampubolon, Daulat P. (2001). Perguruan Tinggi Bermutu. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

  • Verawati, D. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi, Akreditasi Prodi, Fasilitas Pendidikan, Konsentrasi Jurusan Biaya Pendidikan dan Reputasi Pendidik Terhadap Keputusan Mahasiswa Untuk Melanjutkan Magister Akuntansi.Surakarta: Naskah Publikasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

  • Wijanto, Setyo Hari. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling dengan Lisrel 8.8: Konsep dan Tutorial. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

  • Wijatno, Serian. (2009). Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi Secara Efisien, Efektif, dan Ekonomis: Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan dan Mutu Lulusan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

  • Wikipedia.(2018). E-Book-Statistik-Pendidikan-Tinggi-2014-2015-revisi, diakses 10 Juni 2018, http://www/ristekdikti.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/11

  • Zeithaml. Valarie, Bitner & Gremler. (2006). Service Marketing. Singapore: Mc Graw-Hill Companies Inc

  • Zain. (2013). Factors Influencing Students's Decisions In Choosing Private Institutions of Higher Education.Malaysia: Asian Academy of Management Journal

bottom of page