Social Capital Resource Attributes Affecting Performance in Deposit-taking Savings and Credit Co-operatives in Kenya
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 22 June 2023

Social Capital Resource Attributes Affecting Performance in Deposit-taking Savings and Credit Co-operatives in Kenya

Lydiah Wanjiru Kabue, James M. Kilika, Paul M. Waithaka

Kenyatta University

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.06.02.510

Pages: 76-92

Keywords: Performance, Social Capital, Networking, Reputation, Culture, Deposit-taking Savings and Credit Co-operatives, Heterogeneous Resources, Firm Specific, VRIN

Abstract

The paper reports the findings of research on the role of social capital resource attributes on the performance of deposit-taking savings and credit co-operative societies in a developing country context. The research was premised on the logic of the resource-based view that postulates that resources are the basis of performance variances across firms in the same industry. In addition, the study constructs are supported by the institutional theory and the social capital theory. Three attributes of social capital resources, specifically networking, reputation, and culture, were used to operationalize the construct. Data was obtained from representatives of functional areas involved in strategic decision-making in 38 deposit-taking SACCOs in Nairobi, Kenya. Data was collected using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire whose computed Cronbach's alpha score showed that the instrument was reliable and internally consistent at above α=0.9. The study recorded a response rate of 71%. The study found that the three attributes of social capital are embedded in the deposit-taking SACCOs to a high extent and contribute towards improved performance of the deposit-taking SACCOs by explaining 51.3% of the variation of performance. The findings contribute towards explaining the strategic management process through which the components of social capital contribute towards the performance of the sampled organizations and raise several implications on relevant strategic management practices suitable to create and sustain social capital resources for enhanced organizational performance.

References

  1. Ainuddin, R., Beamish, P., Hulland, J., & Rouse, M. (2007). Resource Attributes and Firm Performance in International Joint Ventures. Journal of World Business, 42(1) 47-60.

  2. Ali, T., Sirkova, M. & Ferencova, M. (2016). The Impact of Organizational Culture on Innovation and Creativity. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14 (1) 7-17.

  3. Aujirpongpan, S., & Hareebin, Y. (2020). The effect of strategic intuition, business analytic, networking capabilities and dynamic strategy on innovation performance: The empirical study Thai processed food exporters. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(1), 259-268.

  4. Akram, Tayyaba, Shen Lei, Syed Talib Hussain, Muhammad Jamal Haider, and Muhammad Waqar Akram. 2016. “Does Relational Leadership Generate Organizational Social Capital? A Case of Exploring the Effect of Relational Leadership on Organizational Social Capital in China.” Future Business Journal 2(2):116–26

  5. Alguezaui, Salma and Raffaele Filieri. 2010. “Investigating the Role of Social Capital in Innovation: Sparse versus Dense Network.” Journal of Knowledge Management 14(6):891–909

  6. Alkaf, A., Yusliza, M., Saputra, J. & Muhammad, Z. (2021). A Review of Work Effectiveness and Efficiency, Service Quality and Organizational Performance Literature: A Mini-Review Approach. 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Singapore, March 7-11, 2021.

  7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

  8. Barney, J. (1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Addison, Wesley: Reading M. A.

  9. Barney, J. (2014). Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Pearson Higher Ed.

  10. Barney, J., Ketchen, D. & Wright, M. (2011). The Future of Resource Based Theory: Revitalization or Decline? Journal of Management, 37 (5) 1299-1315.

  11. Baumol, W., Litan, R. & Schramm, C. (2008). Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism and Economics of Growth and Prosperity. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

  12. Buluma, F., Kung’u, J. & Mungai, F. (2017). Effect of SASRA Regulations on Financial Performance of Nyandarua County’s Deposit Taking SACCOs in Kenya, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(7) 614-636.

  13. Baridula, V. & Mekuri-Ndimele, J. (2021). The effect of costly-to-imitate capabilities on sustained competitive advantage in manufacturing firms in Nigeria. African Journal of Business and Economic Development, 1 (5) 16-29.

  14. Campbell, J. (2007). Why Should Corporations Behave in a Socially Responsible Way? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3) 946-967.

  15. Cardeal, N. & Antonio, N. (2012). Valuable, rare, inimitable resources and organization (VRIO) resources or valuable, rare, inimitable resources (VRI) capabilities: What leads to competitive advantage? African Journal of Business Management, 6 (37) 10159-10170.

  16. Chaudhuri, B. (2016). Reputation and Organizational Performance: The Moderating Role of Intangible Assets. Academy of Management Conference Proceedings,2016 (1):16064

  17. Ciabuschi F., Holm U., Martín O. [2014], Dual embeddedness, influence and performance of innovating subsidiaries in the multinational corporation, International Business Review, 23(5): 897–909.

  18. Claridge T. (2018). Introduction to Social Capital Thoery. Social Capital Reserach, New Zealand.

  19. Clulow, V., Gerstman, J. & Barry, C. (2007). The Resources Based View and Value: The Customer Based View of the Firm. Journal of European Industrial Training, 3 (1) 19-35.

  20. Cohen, M., March, J. & Olsen, J. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1) 1-25.

  21. De Luca, M., Parente, P., Silva, E. & Sousa, R. (2018). The effect of creative corporate culture and intangibility on the performance of foreign firms traded on the NYSE. Innovation & Management Review, 15(4), 356-372.

  22. DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. (1983).The Iron Age Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 4 (2), 147–160.

  23. Dobbin, Frank, R., Beth, S. & Geoffrey, G. (2007). The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition or Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1) 449-472.

  24. Fahy, J. (2000). The Resource Based View of the Firm. Some Stumbling Blocks on the Road to Understanding Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(2/3/4) 94-104.

  25. Fonfara K., Małys Ł., Ratajczak-Mrozek M. (eds.) [2018], The Internationalisation Maturity of the Firm – A Business Relationships Perspective, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  26. Gibson, J. H., Hardy, M., & Buckley, R. (2014). Understanding the role of networking in organizations. Career Development International, 19(2), 146-161.

  27. Helfat, C. & Raubitschek R. (2000). Product Sequencing: Co-evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10), 961-979.

  28. Ismail, A. I., Rose, R. C., Uli, J. & Abdullah, H. (2012). The Relationship between Organizational Resources, Capabilities, Systems and Competitive Advantage. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 17 (1) 151-173.

  29. Lee, J. & Roh, J. (2012). Revisiting corporate reputation and firm performance link. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19 (4) 649 – 664.

  30. Lee, S. & Whitford, A. (2012). Impacts of Organizational Resources on Agency Performance: Evidence From Federal Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23 (3) 687-712.

  31. Leiblein, M. (2011). What do Resource and Capability-based Theories Propose? Journal of Management, 37 (4) 901-932.

  32. Kabue, L. & Kilika, J. (2016). Firm Resources, Core Competencies and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: An Integrative Theoretical Framework. Journal of Management and Strategy, 7(1) 98-106.

  33. Kipkosgey, B. & Njeru, A. (2014). Effects of New Product Development on Customer Attraction by SACCOs in Baringo County Kenya. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 3(8), 112-119.

  34. Kiragu, D. (2012). The Effect of SACCO Societies Regulatory Authority’s Regulations on Financial Performance of SACCOs in Nairobi County. University of Nairobi, Kenya, Unpublished MBA Thesis.

  35. Kozlenkova, I., Samaha, S. & Palmatier, R. (2013). Resource Based Theory in Marketing.  Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42 (1) 1-21.

  36. Lefebvre, Virginie Marie, Douglas Sorenson, Maeve Henchion, and Xavier Gellynck. 2016. “Social Capital and Knowledge Sharing Performance of Learning Networks.” International Journal of Information Management 36(4):570–79.

  37. Ma, H. (2015). Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance. Competitive Review, 10 (2) 15-32.

  38. Madhani, P. (2010). Resource Based View (RBV) of Competitive Advantage: An Overview. New Delhi: The ICFAI University Press.

  39. March, J. & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

  40. Maxwell, J. A. & Mitapalli, K. (2010). Realism as a Stance for Mixed Method Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

  41. Menike, L. & Belihuloya, L. (2020). Effect of social capital on firm performance: An empirical study of small enterprises in Sri Lanka. Journal of Social Science Research, 16 (2020) 2321-1091

  42. Miller, C. A. (2007). Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions and Global Governance. Governance, 20(1) 325-357.

  43. Mu, J., Mu, J., Thomas, E., Peng, G., & Benedetto, A. D. (2017). Strategic orientation and new product development performance: The role of networking capability and networking ability. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 187-201.

  44. Mugambi, D. N., Njeru, A. M., Ondahu, F. (2015). Effect of Cash Management on Financial Performance of DT-SACCOs in Mount Kenya Region. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(2) 2250-3153.

  45. Okwach, R. M. (2017). Innovation capability and performance of deposit taking SACCOs in Nairobi County. Unpublished MSC project, University of Nairobi.

  46. Parida, V., Pesamaa, O., Wincent, J., & Westerberg, M. (2017). Network capability, innovativeness, and performance: a multidimensional extension for entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(1-2), 94-115

  47. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  48. Ratajczak-Mrozek M. [2015], The SME perspective on motives and success factors in cross-border mergers: The importance of network position, IMP Journal, 9(2): 136–162.

  49. Rifat, K. (2017). The Contribution of Tangible and Intangible Resources and Capabilities to a Firm’s Profitability. Market Performance, 26 (2) 252-275.

  50. Ritthaisong, Y., Johri, L. M. & Speece, M. (2012). Sources of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: The case of Rice Milling Firms in Thailand. British Food Journal, 116(2) 272-291.

  51. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2012). Essentials of organizational behavior (11th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

  52. Robinson, R. (2008). Understanding the Resource Based View: Implications of Methodological Choice and New Creative Context. Unpublished doctorial thesis: Queensland University of Techology.

  53. SACCO Societies Regulatory Authority (2017). Financial Report on all DT-SACCOs Licensed to Transact in Financial Year 2016. Retrieved from http://www.sasra.go.ke/

  54. SACCO Societies Regulatory Authority (2028). The Sacco supervision annual report 2016.Retrieved from http://www.sasra.go.ke/

  55. SACCO Societies Regulatory Authority (2022). The Sacco supervision annual report 2016.Retrieved from http://www.sasra.go.ke/

  56. SACCO Societies Regulatory Authority (2020). The Sacco supervision annual report 2016.Retrieved from http://www.sasra.go.ke/

  57. Sagwa, E. V. & Kembu, A. S. (2016). Effects of Competitive Strategy on the Performance of DT-SACCOs in Nairobi County, Kenya. Journal of Business and Management, 8(8) 30-37.

  58. Santos, J. & Brito, L. (2012). Toward a Subjective Measurement Model for Firm Performance. BAR, Rio de Janeiro 9 (6) 95-117.

  59. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business studies (9th ed). Harlow. FT: Prentice Hall.

  60. Scott, W. (2008). Institutions and Organisations: Ideas and Interests (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  61. Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill Building Approach (7thed.). Haddington: John Wiley & Sons.

  62. Singh, S., Del Giudice, M., Tarba, S., & De Bernardi, P. (2019). Top management team shared leadership, market-oriented culture, innovation capability, and firm performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–11.

  63. Sossion, C. C. (2015). Influence of External Environment on Strategies Adopted by DT-SACCOs in Kenya: A Survey of DT-SACCOs in Nairobi County. Strategic Journal of Business and Change Management, 2(1) 2015.

  64. Taouab, O. & Issor, Z. (2019). Firm Performance: Definition and Measurement Models. European Scientific Journal, 15 (1) 1857-1881.

  65. Teddlie, C. & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology with Examples, Journal of Mixed Research Methods, 91 (1) 77-100.

  66. Thoenig, J. (2011). Institutional Theories and Public Instituions: New Agendas and Appropriateness. The Handbook of Public Administration, 5 (1) 185-101.

  67. Tolbert, P. & Zucker, L. (1996). The Institutanalization of Institutional Theory. London: Sage.

  68. Urbano, D., Alvarez, C. & Turro, A. (2013). Organizational Resources and Entrepreneurial Activities. An International Study Management Decision, 51 (4) 854-870.

  69. Wang, H. & Ghose, A. (2011). Green Strategic Alignment: Aligning Business Strategies with Sustainability Objectives. Handbook of Research on Green ICT: Technology Business & Social IGI Global, 1 (1) 29-41.

  70. Wenerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(1984) 171-180.

  71. Wong, C., Lai, K., Shang, K., Lu, C.., & Leung, T. (2012). Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 283–294.

  72. Yang, Y. & Konrad, A. (2011). Understanding Diversity Management Practice: Implications for Institutional Theory and Resource Based Theory. Group Management and Organization, 36 (1) 6-38.

bottom of page