The View of the Citizens in Thessaly Region Regarding the Creation of Non-Performing Loans (NPL’s) in Greece
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 07 February 2019

The View of the Citizens in Thessaly Region Regarding the Creation of Non-Performing Loans (NPL’s) in Greece

George Rigas, George Theodossiou, John Rigas, Apostolos Goulas

University of Thessaly Larissa (Greece), BAIN CAPITAL CREDIT, European Portfolio Operations (London)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.02.01.63

Abstract

This paper presents the investigation of the factorial composition and the internal coherence of a questionnaire on the statements of the citizens on non-performing loans (NPLs) and the reasons of their appearance in Greece, based on data gathered from a sample of 216 citizens region of Thessaly. The questionnaire consists of two categories of questions that refer to: (a) statements of citizens about NPLs (scale A) and (b) statements of citizens on the reasons for the occurrence of NPLs. NPL is any loan that the borrower has delayed more than 90 days to pay the agreed interest or agreed installments. A performing loan provides the bank with interest income that it needs in order to make a profit and grant new loans. When customers fail to comply with the agreed repayment arrangements for 90 or more days, the bank must ensure that more funds are available, based on the assumption that the loan will not be repaid. This limits its ability to grant new loans. Factor analysis identified 8 factors for scale A and 8 for scale B, which interpret 75.86% and 75.23% of the total variation in the respective data sets. The same results have emerged both in the hierarchical cluster analysis method for the clustering of the topics (variables) of the two scales (A and B) and in the residuals method for each subject. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the most important factors of scale A can be considered the "the state should legally protect only the first home of economically weak citizens and reward consistent borrowers" and of scale B the: a) informing citizens about the risk of over-borrowing and restricting bank lending facilities; b) to manage more efficiently the loans granted; c) the Greek Economy have to become more competitive and more efficient; (d) to have a more cautious interest rate policy in times of economic prosperity; e) avoiding populist policies and tackle citizen movements like "I do not pay" and f) leverage to be significantly reduced (a large number of post-dated checks).

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos, F., & Papadatou, D. (1992). Productive synthesis and internal cohesion of questionnaire of recording burnout in sample of nurses. Psychological Subjects 5(3):183-202. (In Greek).

  2. Anastasiou D., Louri H., & Tsionas, M. (2016). Non-performing loans in the Euro Area: are core-periphery banking markets fragmented? Bank of Greece, Working Paper No. 219, December 2016. https://www.bankofgreece.gr/BogEkdoseis/Paper2016219.pdf

  3. Balgova, Nies M., & Plekhanov, A. (2016). "The economic impact of reducing non-performing loans," European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Working Paper No. 193. https://www.ebrd.com/cs/Satellite?c=Content&cid=1395253022347&d=Mobile&pagename=EBRD%2FContent%2FContentLayout

  4. Baudino, P., & Yun, H.  (2017). Resolution of non-performing loans – policy options. Bank for International Settlements. FSI Insights on policy implementation No 3. https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights3.pdf

  5. Berger, A., & DeYoung, R. (1997). “Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(6), pages 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00003-4

  6. Bernanke, B.S., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1999) The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Framework. Handbook of Macroeconomics.  John B. Taylor and Michael Woodford (Ed.), Volume 1, Chapter 21, pages 1342- 1390. http://www.econ.nyu.edu/user/gertlerm/BGGHandbook.pdf

  7. Bofondi, M., & Ropele, T. (2011). Macroeconomic determinants of bad loans: evidence from Italian banks. Bank of Italy.  Economic Research and International Relations Area. Working Paper Number 89. http://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2011-0089/QEF_89.pdf

  8. Charalambakis, E., Dendramis, Y., & Tzavalis, E. (2017). On the determinants of NPLs: Bank of Greece, Working Paper 220 March 2017. http://www.bankofgreece.gr/BogEkdoseis/Paper2017220.pdf

  9. Çifter, A. (2015). Bank concentration and non-performing loans in Central and Eastern European countries, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 16(1):117-137. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.720590

  10. Espinoza, R., & Prasad, A. (2010). “Nonperforming Loans in the GCC Banking Systems and their Macroeconomic Effects.” IMF Working Paper 10/224 (Washington: International Monetary Fund). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/Nonperforming-Loans-in-the-GCC-Banking-System-and-their-Macroeconomic-Effects-24258

  11. Figlewski, S., Frydman, H., & Liang, W. (2012). Modelling the Effect of Macroeconomic Factors on Corporate Default and Credit Rating Transitions. International Review of Economics and Finance, 21(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2011.05.004

  12. Fofack, H., (2005). Nonperforming loans in Sub-Saharan Africa: causal analysis and macroeconomic implications (English). Policy, Research working paper; no. WPS 3769. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/446961468104639856/pdf/wps3769.pdf

  13. Ghosh, S., (2006). Does leverage influence banks' non-performing loans? Evidence from India, Journal of Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 12:  913-918 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500378064 

  14. Investopedia. Nonperforming Loan – NPL – Definition.  https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nonperformingloan.asp

  15. Jiménez, G. & Saurina, J. (2006). Credit Cycles, Credit Risk, and Prudential Regulation

  16. International Journal of Central Banking, 2006, vol. 2, issue 2 http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/718/

  17. Klein, N. (2013). Non-Performing Loans in CESEE: Determinants and Impact on Macroeconomic Performance, IMF Working Paper, WP/13/72. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/Non-Performing-Loans-in-CESEE-Determinants-and-Impact-on-Macroeconomic-Performance-40413

  18. Lawley, D.N. and Maxwell, A.E. (1971) Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. 2nd Edition, Butterworths, London. ISBN 0408701528.

  19. Louzis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., & Metaxas, V. L. (2012). Macroeconomic and Bank-Specific Determinants of Non-Performing Loans in Greece: A Comparative Study of Mortgage, Business, and Consumer Loan Portfolios. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(4), 1012–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.012

  20. Louzis, D. P., A.T. Vouldis, and V.L. Metaxas. 2010. “Macroeconomic and Bank-specific Determinants of Nonperforming Loans in Greece: A Comparative Study of Mortgage, Business and Consumer Loan Portfolios.”, Bank of Greece Working Paper 118. https://www.bankofgreece.gr/BogEkdoseis/Paper2010118.pdf

  21. Makri, V. & Papadatos, K. (2014). How Accounting Information and Macroeconomic Environment Determine Credit Risk, Evidence from Greece. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 7(1), 129–143. http://ijbesar.teiemt.gr/docs/volume7_issue1/volume7_issue1.pdf

  22. Messai, A., (2013). Micro and Macro Determinants of Non-performing Loans, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Vol. 3: 852-860. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/362822

  23. Mylona, P. (2018).The conditions to reduce the "red" loans. https://www.cnn.gr/oikonomia/story/153514/p-mylonas-oi-proypotheseis-gia-na-meiothoyn-ta-kokkina-daneia  [2018, November 5,  access:2018, November 11]

  24. Nkusu,  M. (2011). Nonperforming Loans and Macro-financial Vulnerabilities in Advanced Economies. IMF Working Paper 11/161 (Washington: International Monetary Fund). https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp11161.pdf  

  25. Ozili, P.K. (2019) "Non-performing loans and financial development: new evidence," The Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 20 Issue: 1, pp.59-81, https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-07-2017-0112

  26. Radivojevic, N., & Jovovic, J. (2017). Examining of Determinant of Nonperforming Loans, Prague Economic Papers, 2017. Vol. 26(3), 300–316,  https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.615

  27. Raftopoulou K. (2015). Policy proposals for management of NPLs portfolios. Retrieved from https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/eres2014_ind_108.content_0.pdf  https://financedocbox.com/Credit_and_Debt_and_Loans/71702092-Policy-proposals-for-management-of-npls-portfolios

  28. Saba, I. (2012). Determinants of Non Performing Loans: Case of US Banking Sector. Economic, 44(3), 81–121. http://www.rejournal.eu/article/determinants-non-performing-loans-case-us-banking-sector

  29. Stournaras, I. (2018). Four Pillars to Address NPLs at NPL Summit 2018: Red Loans - Openings & Society. Retrieved from https://www.bankofgreece.gr/Pages/el/Bank/News/default.aspx 

  30. Williams, J. (2004). “Determining Management Behaviour in European Banking.” Journal of Banking and Finance 28(10), 2427–2460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.09.010

bottom of page