Frequency of Placenta Previa on Ultrasonography in Females with History of Caesarean Section
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Health and Medical Sciences

ISSN 2622-7258

Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.09 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.02 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.57 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.52 AM.png
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 26 April 2021

Frequency of Placenta Previa on Ultrasonography in Females with History of Caesarean Section

Zaira Kazmi, Anjum Tazeen, Umair Riaz, Syed Muhammad Yousaf Farooq, Sara Fardous, Amna Saleem, Abdul Wahab, Abrar Akhtar, Mughees-ul-Hassan

University of Lahore, Pakistan

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1994.04.02.158

Pages: 79-83

Keywords: Placenta Previa, Caesarean Section, Ultrasonography

Abstract

Background: Placenta previa (P.P) is a condition where the lower edge of the placenta lies close to the internal os. It may partially or completely cover the internal os. Objectives: To determine the frequency of placenta previa on ultrasonography in females with history of Caesarean section. Methodology: This descriptive study was held in Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital Lahore and Tehsil Headquarter Hospital, Pattoki. Convex Probe Esotae 2.5 5-7MHz and Logiqv3 (5-7MHz) was used in the study. 140 pregnant women with history of previous Caesarean section were included in the study and were examined through convenient sampling. Data was collected after signing the consent form. Statistical software for social sciences (SPSS version 22.0) is used for the analysis of data. Results: According to the data analysis, minimum age patient was of 18 years and maximum age was 41 years. 37(26.4%) women had 1 previous Caesarean section. 57(40.7%) women had 2, 31(22.1%) women had 3, 15(10.7%) had 4 of previous Caesarean sections. 86(61.4%) women had a history of bleeding. 54(38.6%) women had no history of bleeding. According to analysis of placenta previa, 126(90.0%) women did not have a placenta previa and 14(10.0%) women had placenta previa. Cross tabulation analysis between frequency of patients with placenta previa and previous Caesarean cases evaluated that 126 patients with previous Caesarean rate did not placenta previa confirmed on ultrasound whereas 14 patients with previous Caesarean section had placenta previa on ultrasound. Conclusion: Placenta previa is seen in ten percent of subsequent pregnancies in females who have a history of previous Caesarean section.

References

  1. COX, S., HOFFMAN, B., WERNER, C. & CUNNINGHAM, F. 2005. Williams Obstetrics 22nd Edition Study Guide, McGraw-Hill Professional.

  2. CRANE, J. M., VAN DEN HOF, M. C., DODDS, L., ARMSON, B. A. & LISTON, R. 2000. Maternal complications with placenta previa. American journal of perinatology, 17, 101-106.

  3. CUNNINGHAM, F., LEVENO, K., BLOOM, S., SPONG, C. Y. & DASHE, J. 2014. Williams obstetrics, 24e, Mcgraw-hill.

  4. CUNNINGHAM, F. G., NORMAN, F., KENNETH, J., LARRY, C. & JOHN, C. 2005. Williams Obstetrics. 22nd editon. New York: Williams and Wilkins.

  5. DASHE, J. S., MCINTIRE, D. D., RAMUS, R. M., SANTOS-RAMOS, R. & TWICKLER, D. M. 2002. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 99, 692-697.

  6. FAIZ, A. & ANANTH, C. 2003. Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa: an overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine, 13, 175-190.

  7. GARMI, G. & SALIM, R. 2012. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta. Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2012.

  8. GETAHUN, D., OYELESE, Y., SALIHU, H. M. & ANANTH, C. V. 2006. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstetrics & Gynecology,107, 771-778.

  9. GILLIAM, M., ROSENBERG, D. & DAVIS, F. 2002. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 99, 976-980.

  10. HOSSAIN, G., ISLAM, S., MAHMOOD, S., CHAKRABORTY, R., AKHTER, N. & SULTANA, S. 2004. Placenta previa and it's relation with maternal age, gravidity and cesarean section. Mymensingh medical journal: MMJ, 13, 143-148.

  11. NASREEN, F. 2003. Incidence, causes and outcome of placenta previa. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute (Peshawar-Pakistan), 17.

  12. OPPENHEIMER, L., ARMSON, A., FARINE, D., KEENAN-LINDSAY, L., MORIN, V., PRESSEY, T., DELISLE, M.-F., GAGNON, R., MUNDLE, W. R. & VAN AERDE, J. 2007. Diagnosis and management of placenta previa. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 29, 261-266.

  13. SAKORNBUT, E., LEEMAN, L. & FONTAINE, P. 2007. Late pregnancy bleeding. American family physician, 75, 1199-1206.

  14. SILVER, R. M., LANDON, M. B., ROUSE, D. J., LEVENO, K. J., SPONG, C. Y., THOM, E. A., MOAWAD, A. H., CARITIS, S. N., HARPER, M. & WAPNER, R. J. 2006. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstetrics & Gynecology,107, 1226-1232.

  15. WARSHAK, C. R., ESKANDER, R., HULL, A. D., SCIOSCIA, A. L., MATTREY, R. F., BENIRSCHKE, K. & RESNIK, R. 2006. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstetrics & Gynecology,108, 573-581.

bottom of page