Sonographic Assessment of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Adult Males
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Health and Medical Sciences

ISSN 2622-7258

Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.09 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.02 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.57 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.52 AM.png
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 09 November 2019

Sonographic Assessment of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Adult Males

Attaullah, Ihrar Ahmad, Maaz Khan, Natasha Jamil, Mahnoor Amna, Sundas Fatima, Raham Bacha, Muhammad Yousaf

The University of Lahore, Pakistan

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1994.02.04.72

Pages: 468-472

Keywords: Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), Ultrasonography

Abstract

Background: Bladder outlet obstruction in males may be a complex syndrome of either dynamic functional or fixed anatomic forces resulting in resistance to the flow of urine. Particularly in males, bladder outlet obstruction is a frequently encountered finding. From a diagnostic standpoint, the evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction relies heavily upon traditional methods. BOO may be induced by specific functional and anatomic causes. The resulting obstruction frequently produces lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Categorizing and understanding these entities is crucial when proceeding with a LUTS evaluation as specific diagnostic modalities may then be used to delineate the degree of BOO and any secondary issues fully. Objective(s): The objective was to determine the sonographic assessment of bladder outlet obstruction in adult males Methodology: Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of BOO was done by a single operator using the Mindray Z5 and Toshiba xario 100 with convex transducer probe of 3- 6MHz machine in Mayo hospital Lahore, Allied hospital Faisalabad and Gillani ultrasound clinic, Lahore Pakistan. The duration of the study was from July to October. A total of 159 patients were examined through a convenient sampling technique. Statistical software for social sciences (SPSS version 22.0) is used for the analysis of data. Results: The study included 160 patients in total. Table 1 represents the age of the patients. The minimum age of the patients was 24, and the maximum age of the patients was 90. The mean age of the patients was 52. Table 2 represents the sonographic assessment of the patients. Out of 160 patients, 80(50%) had benign prostate hyperplasia, 30(18.8%) had bladder calculus, 22(13.8%) had bladder mass, 28(17.5%) had bladder wall growth. In table 3, 160 patients had a pre-void test. The minimum was 100, and the maximum was 400. The mean was 2.82. According to table 4, 160 patients had post void test. The minimum was 55, and the maximum was 170. The mean of the post-void test was 1.08. Conclusion(s): Ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness has been proposed as a useful diagnostic parameter in patients with bladder outlet obstruction and other voiding dysfunctions. The complete assessment of LUTS arising from BOO includes Ultrasonography to fully define the obstructive impact on the individual's urinary function and quality of life.

References

  1. Frank HN. ATLAS OF HUMAN ANATOMY, ENHANCED INTERNATIONAL EDITION: Including Studentconsult Interactive... Ancillaries and Guides. GRUNE & STRATTON Incorporated; 2014.
  2. Patel U, Rickards D. Imaging and urodynamics of the lower urinary tract. Springer; 2010.
  3. Meire HB. Abdominal and general ultrasound. Churchill Livingstone; 2001.
  4. La Rosette D, Lim TL. The ICS‐‘BPH’Study: uroflowmetry, lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction. British journal of urology 1998;82(5):619-23.
  5. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub‐committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourology and Urodynamics: Official Journal of the International Continence Society 2002;21(2):167-78.
  6. Cosgrove D, Meire H, Dewbury K. Clinical Ultrasound a comprehensive text. Abdominal and General Ultrasound. Vol. 2. Churchill Livingstone. Harcourt Publishers Limited; 2001.
  7. Bala KG, Chou Y-H. Ultrasonography of the urinary bladder. Journal of Medical Ultrasound 2010;18(3):105-14.
  8. Sofronievska M, Ristovski S, Kocubovski M, Glavinov A. Environmental influence in the incidence of bladder cancer. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology 2015;16(2):733-9.
  9. Blaivas JG, Groutz A. Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. Neurourology and Urodynamics: Official Journal of the International Continence Society 2000;19(5):553-64.
  10. SONKE GS, HESKES T, VERBEEK AL, DE LA ROSETTE JJ, KIEMENEY LA. Prediction of bladder outlet obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms using artificial neural networks. The Journal of urology 2000;163(1):300-5.
  11. STEELE GS, SULLIVAN MP, SLEEP DJ, YALLA SV. Combination of symptom score, flow rate and prostate volume for predicting bladder outflow obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. The Journal of urology 2000;164(2):344-8.
  12. El Din KE, Kiemeney L, De Wildt M, Rosier P, Debruyne F, De La Rosette J. The correlation between bladder outlet obstruction and lower urinary tract symptoms as measured by the international prostate symptom score. The Journal of urology 1996;156(3):1020-5.
  13. Floratos DL, de la Rosette JJ. The value of urodynamics in laser prostatectomy. European urology 2000;37(5):509-16.
  14. Ozawa H, Chancellor MB, Ding YY, Nasu Y, Yokoyama T, Kumon H. Noninvasive urodynamic evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction using Doppler ultrasonography. Urology 2000;56(3):408-12.
  15. Hakenberg OW, Linne C, Manseck A, Wirth MP. Bladder wall thickness in normal adults and men with mild lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement. Neurourology and Urodynamics: Official Journal of the International Continence Society 2000;19(5):585-93.
  16. Doebler RW. Transverse prostate measurement obtained using transabdominal ultrasound: possible role in transurethral needle ablation of the prostate. Urology 2000;55(4):564-7.
  17. Müller L, Bergström T, Hellström M, Svensson E, Jacobsson B. Standardized ultrasound method for assessing detrusor muscle thickness in children. The Journal of urology 2000;164(1):134-8.
  18. Kumar V, Marr C, Bhuvangiri A, Irwin P. A prospective study of conservatively managed acute urinary retention: prostate size matters. BJU international 2000;86(7):816-9.
  19. Greenland J, Hvistendahl J, Andersen H, Jörgensen T, McMurray G, Cortina‐Borja M, et al. The effect of bladder outlet obstruction on tissue oxygen tension and blood flow in the pig bladder. BJU international 2000;85(9):1109-14.
  20. Wu M-P, Hsu Y-W, Weng S-F, Ho C-H, Wang J-J, Tong Y-C. Healthcare-seeking prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms among national health insurance enrollees in Taiwan, 2000-2009. Urology 2013;81(1):61-5.
  21. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Thompson CL, Milsom I, Irwin D, Kopp ZS, et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: results from the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study. BJU international 2009;104(3):352-60.
  22. Boyle P, Robertson C, Mazzetta C, Keech M, Hobbs F, Fourcade R, et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in men and women in four centres. The UrEpik study. BJU international 2003;92(4):409-14.
bottom of page