top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 21 December 2024

"This Place is the Source of Our Identity": The Case of the Indigenous People of Atoni Pah Meto with the Mutis Timau National Park in Indonesia

Erna Suminar, Pawito Pawito, Prahastiwi Utari, Drajat Tri Kartono

Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.07.04.538

Pages: 210-222

Keywords: Environmental Communication, Cultural Identity, Environmental Identity, Indigenous People, National Park

Abstract

Identity is always intertwined with collective identity and the surrounding natural environment, and it is the fundamental foundation that defines who they are to the surrounding nature. In the context of decision-making, Mutis Timau National Park shows that a lack of voice in Indigenous peoples is accommodated and a lack of identity recognition, but only involves specific individuals selectively. This paper is based on an explanatory case study, and the findings of this study reveal the importance of space for better environmental policy design, especially those guided by collaborative action in environmental decisions by accommodating the voices of indigenous leaders or community leaders from various clans fairly. Environmental communication with respect for culture and identity recognition will enhance collaboration and support the effectiveness of nature conservation and socio-cultural sustainability. The theoretical contribution of this research corroborates a significant contribution to the environmental communication literature and offers a practical framework contribution to be applied to inclusive communication strategies in a global context.

References

  1. Akalibey, S., Hlaváčková, P., Schneider, J., Fialová, J., Darkwah, S., & Ahenkan, A. (2024). Integrating indigenous knowledge and culture in sustainable forest management via global environmental policies. Journal of Forest Science, 70(6), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.17221/20/2024-JFS

  2. Allison, E. (2015). Religion inscribed in the landscape: Sacred sites, local deities and natural resource use in the himalayas. In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics(pp. 439–459). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_22

  3. Banerjee, P., & Sowards, S. K. (2022). Working across languages/cultures in international and environmental communication fieldwork. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2020.1850844

  4. Barrett, P., & Sutrisna, M. (2009). Methodological strategies to gain insights into informality and emergence in construction project case studies. Construction Management and Economics, 27(10), 935–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903273943

  5. Batiran, K. B., Fisher, M. R., Verheijen, B., Sirimorok, N., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2023). Uprooting the Mosalaki: Changing institutions and livelihood impacts at Kelimutu National Park. Forest and Society, 7(2), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v7i2.26464

  6. Benetti, S., & Langemeyer, J. (2021). Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas: the case of Circeo National Park, Italy. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155

  7. Black, K., & McBean, E. (2016). Increased indigenous participation in environmental decision-making: A policy analysis for the improvement of indigenous health. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2016.7.4.5

  8. Bogdanovic, D., Dowd, M., Wattam, E., & Adam, A. (2012). Contesting methodologies: Evaluating focus group and privacy diary methods in a study of on-line privacy. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 10(4), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/14779961211285854

  9. Bonatti, M., Bayer, S., Pope, K., Eufemia, L., Turetta, A. P. D., Tremblay, C., & Sieber, S. (2023). Assessing the Effectiveness and Justice of Protected Areas Governance: Issues and Situated Pathways to Environmental Policies in Río Negro National Park, Paraguay. Social Sciences, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020071

  10. Bonye, S. Z., Yiridomoh, G. Y., & Nsiah, V. (2023). Our forest, our livelihood: Natural resources’ use controversies and community livelihood sustainability in the Mole National Park, Ghana. Land Use Policy, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106589

  11. Boyd, A. D., & Furgal, C. M. (2019). Communicating Environmental Health Risks with Indigenous Populations: A Systematic Literature Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Studies. Health Communication, 34(13), 1564–1574. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1507658

  12. Brock, T., Reed, M. G., & Stewart, K. J. (2023). A practical framework to guide collaborative environmental decision making among Indigenous Peoples, corporate, and public sectors. Extractive Industries and Society, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101246

  13. Brondízio, E. S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bates, P., Carino, J., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Ferrari, M. F., Galvin, K., Reyes-García, V., McElwee, P., Molnár, Z., Samakov, A., & Shrestha, U. B. (2021). Locally Based, Regionally Manifested, and Globally Relevant: Indigenous and Local Knowledge, Values, and Practices for Nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127

  14. Brown, M., & Murtha, T. (2019). Integrating natural and cultural resources in North American large-landscape conservation. Environmental Practice, 21(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2019.1601935

  15. Burns, M., Bally, J., Burles, M., Holtslander, L., & Peacock, S. (2022). Constructivist Grounded Theory or Interpretive Phenomenology? Methodological Choices Within Specific Study Contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221077758

  16. Caillon, S., Cullman, G., Verschuuren, B., & Sterling, E. J. (2017). Moving beyond the human–nature dichotomy through biocultural approaches: Including ecological well-being in resilience indicators. Ecology and Society, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09746-220427

  17. Calcagni, F., Nogué Batallé, J., Baró, F., & Langemeyer, J. (2022). A tag is worth a thousand pictures: A framework for an empirically grounded typology of relational values through social media. Ecosystem Services, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101495

  18. Campbell, S., & Gurney, L. (2024). What are we protecting? Rethinking relational values and nature(s). Ecosystems and People, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2315973

  19. Cepeda, G., & Martin, D. (2005). A review of case studies publishing in Management Decision 2003-2004. Guides and criteria for achieving quality in qualitative research. Management Decision, 43(6), 851–876. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510603600

  20. Chami, M. F. (2021). Safeguarding ritual practices in the limestone cave areas along the Swahili coast of the Indian Ocean in Tanzania. International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 16, 92–103. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85126850094&partnerID=40&md5=1f6558c4afa213af11bf98742d7f84b1

  21. Chowdhury, M. S. H., Koike, M., & Muhammed, N. (2009). Embracing collaborative protected area management for conservation: An analysis of the development of the forest policy of Bangladesh. International Forestry Review, 11(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.11.3.359

  22. Cocks, M. (2006). Biocultural diversity: Moving beyond the realm of “indigenous” and “local” people. Human Ecology, 34(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9013-5

  23. Cogos, S., Roué, M., & Roturier, S. (2017). Sami Place Names and Maps: Transmitting Knowledge of a Cultural Landscape in Contemporary Contexts. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 49(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1657/AAAR0016-042

  24. Dahal, R. (2021). Nepal’s Network of Protected Areas and Nature-Based Tourism. In Geographies of Tourism and Global Change (pp. 245–268). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76833-1_12

  25. De La Cruz Nassar, P. E., Bello Baltazar, E., Acosta Muñoz, L. E., Estrada Lugo, E. I. J., Arce Ibarra, M., & García Barrios, L. E. (2020). Traditional Knowledge in the Colombian Amazon: Tensions Between Indigenous Territorial Autonomy and Environmental Governance. In Socio-Environmental Regimes and Local Visions: Transdisciplinary Experiences in Latin America(pp. 27–47). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49767-5_2

  26. De Pourcq, K., Thomas, E., Arts, B., Vranckx, A., Léon-Sicard, T., & Van Damme, P. (2017). Understanding and Resolving Conflict Between Local Communities and Conservation Authorities in Colombia. World Development, 93, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.026

  27. Domínguez, M. E. (2020). A place to find oneself. Displacements and rituals among guarani people from paraguayan chaco. Revista de Antropologia, 63(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2020.172072

  28. Dovchin, S., Dovchin, U., & Gower, G. (2024). The discourse of the Anthropocene and posthumanism: Indigenous peoples and local communities. Ethnicities, 24(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968231219778

  29. Durmaz, A., Torunoğlu, E. I., Aydin, B., & Aytar, E. C. (2024). Need for biodiversity conservation and conservation strategies. In Biodiversity Loss Assessment for Ecosystem Protection (pp. 167–187). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3330-3.ch010

  30. Dutta, U. (2020). Protecting Sacred-groves: Community-led Environmental Organizing by Santhals of Eastern India. Environmental Communication, 14(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1585895

  31. Eckert, L. E., XEMŦOLTW– Claxton, N., Owens, C., Johnston, A., Ban, N. C., Moola, F., & Darimont, C. T. (2020). Indigenous knowledge and federal environmental assessments in Canada: Applying past lessons to the 2019 impact assessment act. Facets, 5(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1139/FACETS-2019-0039

  32. Emini, T., Clarke, C., & Long, C. (2023). Ripples from a single stone: Indigenous mobilization for community tenure-led conservation in Cameroon. ORYX, 57(3), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605323000157

  33. Fish, J., & Counts, P. K. (2021). “Justice for Native People, Justice for Native Me”: Using Digital Storytelling Methodologies to Change the Master Narrative of Native American Peoples. In Cultural Methods in Psychology: Describing and Transforming Cultures (pp. 237–272). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095949.003.0008

  34. Fix, G. M., Kim, B., Ruben, M. A., & McCullough, M. B. (2022). Direct observation methods: A practical guide for health researchers. PEC Innovation, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100036

  35. Fox, D., & Xu, F. (2017). Evolutionary and socio-cultural influences on feelings and attitudes towards nature: a cross-cultural study. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2016.1217894

  36. Frey, R. (2007). Oral Traditions. In A Companion to the Anthropology of American Indians (pp. 154–170). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996270.ch9

  37. Galanis, P. (2018). Methods of data collection in qualitative research. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 35(2), 268–277. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044782357&partnerID=40&md5=12ad63254aeb250ed62a5ad6a2a3ff93

  38. Guntarik, O. (2009). Resistance narratives a comparative account of indigenous sites of dissent. Narrative Inquiry, 19(2), 306–327. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19.2.06gun

  39. He, J., & Guo, N. (2021). Culture and parks: Incorporating cultural ecosystem services into conservation in the Tibetan region of Southwest China. Ecology and Society, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12572-260312

  40. Heurich, M., Beudert, B., Rall, H., & Křenová, Z. (2010). National parks as model regions for interdisciplinary long-term ecological research: The bavarian forest and šumavá national parks underway to transboundary ecosystem research. In Long-Term Ecological Research: Between Theory and Application (pp. 327–344). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8782-9_23

  41. Huambachano, M., & Cooper, L. (2021). Values, Knowledge, and Rights Shaping Land Use in the Peruvian Amazon: The Shimaa and Diamante Case Studies. Case Studies in the Environment, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2020.1234945.1

  42. Infield, M., & Mugisha, A. (2018). Cultural values and conservation: An innovative approach to community engagement. In Conservation and Development in Uganda (pp. 171–186). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108767318&partnerID=40&md5=d12be200d54b31bc3ce882fe33da70e3

  43. Iseke-Barnes, J., & Danard, D. (2006). Indigenous knowledges and worldview: Representations and the internet. In Information Technology and Indigenous People (pp. 27–37). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-298-5.ch003

  44. Javeed, B., Huang, D., Shangguan, D., Ahsan Mukhtar, M., Sajjad, W., Banerjee, A., Yang, Q., & Butt, A. Q. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of national park’s policies and laws in promoting biodiversity conservation and ecological development in Pakistan. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1333650

  45. Jiao, W., Liu, X., & He, S. (2022). Establishing an ecological monitoring system for national parks in China: A theoretical framework. Ecological Indicators, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109414

  46. Kariyawasam, S., Wilson, C., Rathnayaka, L. I. M., Sooriyagoda, K. G., & Managi, S. (2020). Conservation versus socio-economic sustainability: A case study of the Udawalawe National Park, Sri Lanka. Environmental Development, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100517

  47. Ko, H. (2020). Teaching older adults: an instructional model from Singapore. Educational Gerontology, 46(12), 731–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2020.1807689

  48. Latulippe, N., & Klenk, N. (2020). Making room and moving over: knowledge co-production, Indigenous knowledge sovereignty and the politics of global environmental change decision-making. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.010

  49. Li, K., & Li, F. (2022). Natural resource management of China’s national parks. Biodiversity Science, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2021179

  50. Ma, T., Jia, L., Zhong, L., Gong, X., & Wei, Y. (2023). Governance of China’s Potatso National Park Influenced by Local Community Participation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010807

  51. Martinson, K., & O’Brien, C. (2015). Conducting Case Studies. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation: Fourth Edition(pp. 177–196). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch8

  52. Marvasti, A. (2009). Interviews and Interviewing. In International Encyclopedia of Education, Third Edition (pp. 424–429). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01583-9

  53. McConvell, P., Keen, I., & Hendery, R. (2013). Kinship systems: Change and reconstruction. In Kinship Systems: Change and Reconstruction. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85014529435&partnerID=40&md5=94364140dce011cbb9a53043bb6cc139

  54. McKenzie, T. L., & Van Der Mars, H. (2015). Top 10 research questions related to assessing physical activity and its contexts using systematic observation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 86(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2015.991264

  55. McLeod, J. (2017). An Introduction to Qualitative Research in Counselling Psychology. In Counselling Psychology: A Textbook for Study and Practice (pp. 394–407). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394259298.ch26

  56. Menzies, A. K., Bowles, E., McGregor, D., Ford, A. T., & Popp, J. N. (2024). Sharing Indigenous values, practices and priorities as guidance for transforming human–environment relationships. People and Nature, 6(5), 2109–2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10707

  57. Mestanza-Ramón, C., Henkanaththegedara, S. M., Duchicela, P. V, Tierras, Y. V, Capa, M. S., Mejía, D. C., Gutierrez, M. J., Guamán, M. C., & Ramón, P. M. (2020). In-situ and ex-situ biodiversity conservation in ecuador: A review of policies, actions and challenges. Diversity, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/D12080315

  58. Michaelidou, M., & Decker, D. J. (2005). Incorporating local values in european union conservation policy: The cyprus case. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200590931789

  59. Mistry, J., Jafferally, D., Mendonca, S., Xavier, R., Albert, G., Robertson, B., George, E., Benjamin, R., & Ingwall-King, L. (2023). Video-mediated dialogue for promoting equity in protected area conservation. ORYX, 57(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605322000904

  60. Moola, F., Jolly, H., Borah, J., & Roth, R. (2024). The potential for Indigenous-led conservation in urbanized landscapes in Canada. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1340379

  61. Moswete, N. N., Thapa, B., & Child, B. (2012). Attitudes and opinions of local and national public sector stakeholders towards Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, Botswana. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 19(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2011.592551

  62. Mu, Y., Nepal, S. K., & Lai, P.-H. (2019). Tourism and sacred landscape in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Tourism Geographies, 21(3), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1558454

  63. Muhar, A., Raymond, C. M., van den Born, R. J. G., Bauer, N., Böck, K., Braito, M., Buijs, A., Flint, C., de Groot, W. T., Ives, C. D., Mitrofanenko, T., Plieninger, T., Tucker, C., & van Riper, C. J. (2018). A model integrating social-cultural concepts of nature into frameworks of interaction between social and natural systems. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(5–6), 756–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1327424

  64. Niigaaniin, M., & MacNeill, T. (2022). Indigenous culture and nature relatedness: Results from a collaborative study. Environmental Development, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100753

  65. Novo, P., Byg, A., & Herrett, S. (2024). Digging for nature: human-nature relations in the context of growing plants. Ecosystems and People, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2358499

  66. Nyangila, J. M. (2012). Sacred species of Kenyan sacred sites. In Sacred Species and Sites: Advances in Biocultural Conservation(pp. 351–364). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030717.033

  67. Ormsby, A. (2013). Analysis of local attitudes toward the sacred groves of Meghalaya and Karnataka, India. Conservation and Society, 11(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.115722

  68. Pandey, R., & Kumari, N. (2024). Ecological imaginations in the ho spirituality: A multispecies inquiry in Jharkhand. In The Routledge Handbook of Tribe and Religions in India: Contemporary Readings on Spirituality, Belief and Identity (pp. 113–127). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003510826-9

  69. Queiros, D. R. (2023). Planning for Socio-Ecological Conservation in South African Nature Reserves: Model of Influences on the Attitudes of Proximate Communities. Land, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091815

  70. Rice, W. S. (2022). Exploring common dialectical tensions constraining collaborative communication required for post-2020 conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115187

  71. Rodríguez-Izquierdo, E., Gavin, M. C., & Macedo-Bravo, M. O. (2010). Barriers and triggers to community participation across different stages of conservation management. Environmental Conservation, 37(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000500

  72. Samakov, A., & Berkes, F. (2016). Ysyk-köl lake, the planet’s third eye: Sacred sites in Ysyk-Köl Biosphere Reserve. In Asian Sacred Natural Sites: Philosophy and practice in protected areas and conservation (pp. 208–220). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676272-28

  73. Sherwood, J. (2016). An aboriginal health worker’s research story. In Indigenous Pathways into Social Research: Voices of a New Generation (pp. 203–217). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315426693-18

  74. Shiferaw, A., Hebo, M., & Senishaw, G. (2023). The spiritual ecology of sacred landscapes: Evidence from sacred forests of the Sebat Bête Gurage, Central - South Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2210900

  75. Siburian, C. R., Hidayat, H., Ekawati, S., Rachmawan, D., & Utomo, M. M. B. (2024). Implementation of conservation partnership to improving the role of local community in the management of Mount Rinjani National Park, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 28. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.28.41.1-15

  76. Silva, S., Silva, L. F., & Vieira, A. (2023). Protected Areas and Nature-Based Tourism: A 30-Year Bibliometric Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511698

  77. Smith, P. R. (2018). Collecting sufficient evidence when conducting a case study. Qualitative Report, 23(5), 1043–1048. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85047091106&partnerID=40&md5=5521313825d6a4125b3377e9c7ab4209

  78. Solorio, I., Romero, R., & Ros, C. (2023). INDIGENOUS AND LOCAL KNOWLEDGE IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING: The Case of Climate Change. In Routledge Handbook of Environmental Policy (pp. 194–206). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003043843-16

  79. Thaker, J. (2021). Environmentalism of the Poor: Global South Perspectives on Environmental Communication. In The Handbook of International Trends in Environmental Communication (pp. 193–205). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367275204-15

  80. Ulanovsky, A. M. (2006). Qualitative methodology and the constructivist paradigm in psychology. Voprosy Psikhologii, 3, 27-37+191. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33747045282&partnerID=40&md5=ae9e2ec68943581db44325f537232dad

  81. Ungar, P., & Strand, R. (2012). Inclusive protected area management in the Amazon: The importance of social networks over ecological knowledge. Sustainability, 4(12), 3260–3278. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4123260

  82. Vannini, P., & Vannini, A. (2020). Re-animating Gros Morne’s storyless space: From natural heritage to ecological heritage. Area, 52(1), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12533

  83. von der Porten, S., Ota, Y., Cisneros-Montemayor, A., & Pictou, S. (2019). The Role of Indigenous Resurgence in Marine Conservation. Coastal Management, 47(6), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2019.1669099

  84. Wathl thla, A. D. K., Mayanilth, D. S.-S., Oqwilowgwa, K. R.-C., Moxmowisa, D. D., & Turner Galitsimga, N. J. (2022). “from the beginning of time”: The colonial reconfiguration of native habitats and Indigenous resource practices on the British Columbia Coast. Facets, 7, 543–570. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0092

  85. Williamson, K. (2018). Questionnaires, individual interviews and focus group interviews. In Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts: Second Edition (pp. 379–403). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00016-9

  86. Yng, T. K., & Kaoteera, R. (2021). DO COMMUNITY CULTURES AND TRADITIONS INFLUENCE ON NATURE CONSERVATION PERSPECTIVES? A CASE OF KHAO YAI NATIONAL PARK IN THAILAND. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 16(6), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2021.08.020

  87. Ziker, J. P. (2006). The social movement of meat in Taimyr, Northern Russia. Nomadic Peoples, 10(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.3167/np.2006.100207

bottom of page