top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political


ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
open access

Published: 20 May 2023

Chinese New Zealanders’ Online Political Discussions and Lived Power Experience

Yu Du

University of Auckland, New Zealand

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 85-97

Keywords: Chinese New Zealanders, Four Dimensions of Power, Online Political Discussions, Political Participation


This paper explores the relationship between Chinese New Zealanders’ online political discussions and participation. It also uses Mark Haugaard’s four dimensions of power theory to explore their power experiences during online political discussions. Based on an interpretive analysis of 38 Chinese New Zealanders’ in-depth interviews, I found that interviewees discussed domestic and international politics online. The relationships between their political discussions and participation were complex. Additionally, interviewees experienced diverse power dimensions simultaneously in online discussions, and their interpretations of power varied. This study deepens our understanding of how power operates in everyday life.


  1. Al-Rawi, A. (2019). Facebook and virtual nationhood: Social media and the Arab Canadians community. AI & Society, 34, 559-571.

  2. Allen, A. (1999). The power of feminist theory. Westview Press.

  3. Bachrach, P, & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review, 57(3), 632-642.

  4. Baek, Y. M., Wojcieszak, M., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2012). Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects? New Media & Society, 14(3), 363-383.

  5. Bamman, D., O'Connor, B., & Smith, N. (2012). Censorship and deletion practices in Chinese social media. First Monday, 17(3), 1-26.

  6. Barker, F., & McMillan, K. (2017). Factors influencing the electoral participation of Asian immigrants in New Zealand. Political Science, 69(2), 139-160.

  7. Bauböck, R. (2006). Stakeholder citizenship and transnational political participation: A normative evaluation of external voting. Fordham Law Review, 75, 2393-2447.

  8. Bernal, V. (2006). Diaspora, cyberspace and political imagination: The Eritrean diaspora online. Global Networks, 6(2), 161-179.

  9. Bevelander, P. (2015). Voting participation of immigrants in Sweden—A cohort analysis of 2002, 2006 and 2010 elections. Journal of International Migration Integration, 16(1), 61-80.

  10. Bilodeau, A. (2008). Immigrants’ voice through protest politics in Canada and Australia: Assessing the impact of pre-migration political repression. Journal of Ethnic Migration Studies, 34(6), 975-1002.

  11. Bilodeau, A. (2014). Is democracy the only game in town? Tension between immigrants’ democratic desires and authoritarian imprints. Democratization, 21(2), 359-381.

  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

  13. Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2009). Digital diasporas: Identity and transnational engagement. Cambridge University Press.

  14. Chan, M., Yi, J., & Kuznetsov, D. (2022). Government digital repression and political engagement: A cross-national multilevel analysis examining the roles of online surveillance and censorship. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 0(0), 1-23.

  15. Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155-172). The Guilford Press.

  16. Coley, J. S., & Das, D. (2020). Creating safe spaces: Opportunities, resources, and LGBTQ student groups at US colleges and universities. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6, 1-12.

  17. Conge, P. J. (1988). The concept of political participation: Toward a definition. Comparative Politics, 20(2), 241-249.

  18. Couldry, N., Stephansen, H., Fotopoulou, A., MacDonald, R., Clark, W., & Dickens, L. (2014). Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture. Citizenship Studies, 18(6-7), 615-629.

  19. Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201-215.

  20. Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

  21. Dal Poz, I. (2020). Foucault and the politics of self-government. [Doctoral dissertation, Monash University]. Melbourne.

  22. Ersanilli, E., & Koopmans, R. (2010). Rewarding integration? Citizenship regulations and the socio-cultural integration of immigrants in the Netherlands, France, and Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 773-791.

  23. Eveland Jr, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205-224.

  24. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth.

  25. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.

  26. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.

  27. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021). WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation, and activism: Exploring direct, indirect and generational effects. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 201-218.

  28. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Diehl, T., & Ardévol-Abreu, A. (2017). Internal, external, and government political efficacy: Effects on news use, discussion, and political participation. Journal of Broadcasting Electronic Media, 61(3), 574-596.

  29. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MIT Press.

  30. Haugaard, M. (2012). Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 33-54.

  31. Haugaard, M. (2020). The fourth dimension of power: The making of the social subject. Manchester University Press.

  32. Haugaard, M. (2021). The four dimensions of power: Conflict and democracy. Journal of Political Power, 14(1), 153-175.

  33. Havercroft, J. (2021). Why is there no just riot theory? British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 909-923.

  34. Huu, A. N. (2022). Social media and the online political engagement of immigrants: The case of the Vietnamese diaspora in Poland. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 11(1), 85-107.

  35. Kissau, K., & Hunger, U. (2008). Political online participation of migrants in Germany. German Policy Studies, 4(4), 5-31.

  36. Liu, L. (2011). New Zealand case study of PRC transnational migration: Returnees and trans-Tasman migrants. In M. Ip (Ed.), Transmigration the new Chinese: Theories practices from the New Zealand experience (pp. 57-101). University of Hong Kong Press.

  37. Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. Palgrave Macmillan.

  38. Moss, D. M. (2018). The ties that bind: Internet communication technologies, networked authoritarianism, and “voice” in the Syrian diaspora. Globalizations, 15(2), 265-282.

  39. Mouffe, C. (2009). The democratic paradox. Verso.

  40. Murchison, A. (2009). Political communication in New Zealand: A study of political party advertising in the 2008 general election [Paper presentation]. New Zealand Political Studies Association Conference, University of Auckland, Auckland.

  41. Nagel, C., & Staeheli, L. (2010). ICT and geographies of British Arab and Arab American activism. Global Networks, 10(2), 262-281.

  42. Nedelcu, M. (2012). Migrants’ new transnational habitus: Rethinking migration through a cosmopolitan lens in the digital age. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1339-1356.

  43. Oiarzabal, P. J. (2012). Diaspora Basques and online social networks: An analysis of users of Basque institutional diaspora groups on Facebook. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1469-1485.

  44. Pilati, K., & Morales, L. (2016). Ethnic and immigrant politics vs. mainstream politics: The role of ethnic organizations in shaping the political participation of immigrant-origin individuals in Europe. Ethnic Racial Studies, 39(15), 2796-2817.

  45. Quintelier, E. (2009). The political participation of immigrant youth in Belgium. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(6), 919-937.

  46. Reips, U.-D., & Buffardi, L. E. (2012). Studying migrants with the help of the Internet: Methods from psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1405-1424.

  47. Rudd, C., & Hayward, J. (2005). Media takeover or media intrusion? Modernization, the media and political communications in New Zealand. Political Science, 57(2), 7-16.

  48. Sandovici, M. E., & Listhaug, O. (2010). Ethnic and linguistic minorities and political participation in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 51(1-2), 111-136.

  49. Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. Routledge.

  50. Siapera, E., & Veikou, M. (2013). Social media affordances and migrant political practices. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 12(4), 100-119.

  51. StatsNZ. (2020). Chinese ethnic group.

  52. Sun, W. (2005). Media and the Chinese diaspora: Community, consumption, and transnational imagination. Journal of Chinese Overseas, 1(1), 65-86.

  53. Uldam, J., & Askanius, T. (2013). Online civic cultures? Debating climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1185-1204.

  54. Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2011). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163-184.

  55. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.

  56. Vowles, J. (2015). The 2014 New Zealand general election: Varieties of political communication. Political Science, 67(2), 89-93.

  57. Wong, L. (2003). Belonging and diaspora: The Chinese and the internet. First Monday, 8(6), 1-15.

  58. Yin, R. (2003). Applications of case study research. SAGE Publication

  59. Zheng, J. (2022). Chinese New Zealanders in Aotearoa: Media consumption and political engagement. Pacific Journalism Review, 28(1/2), 189-204

bottom of page