Journal of Social and Political
Sciences
ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)
ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)
Published: 09 July 2018
Ethnicity and Development – A Civil Society Perspective from North-East India
Susmita Sen Gupta
North- Eastern Hill University, India
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1991.01.02.20
Abstract
Civil society in northeast India has emerged gradually over the last few decades. It is observed that civil society organizations especially student and youth groups have thrived on the margins of the Indian political system, in the buffer space between political parties and insurgent groups. It is significant to note that most of these organizations in the northeast are based on ethnic affiliations, and hence ethnicity creeps into all civic spheres into which these organizations intervene, prompting some scholars to describe these organizations as “civic representatives” of ethnic groups and communities. In the context of the above, the proposed research paper seeks to examine the role of some major student and youth organizations of Meghalaya, a state of northeast India, as champions of the interests of the respective ethnic communities they claim to represent. The paper also proposes to focus on the developmental agenda of the Indian State and to enquire into the contradictions and dilemmas that have arisen as a result of the vigorous pursuit of ethnic agenda by these civil society organizations. The paper is structured into the following sections. The first section conceptualizes student and youth organizations as important components of the civil society in northeast India. In the second section, development constraints in northeast India have been discussed. The next section highlights the role of some of the student and youth organizations of Meghalaya as champions of ethnic interests. The fourth section identifies a few contemporary issues are dominating the developmental agenda in Meghalaya and focuses on the views of these organizations on the same. The final section examines the contradictions between ethnic sensitivities and the developmental agenda in Meghalaya and summarizes the main observations of the paper.
References
Alison, Abysk.(Ed).(2002). Globalization and human rights. Irvine:University of California Press.
Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. London: Sage
Publications.
Baral, K.C. (2006, July). Globalization and tribes of north-east India (Editorial), Indian folklife, Serial No. 22.
Behera, M.C. (Ed).(2004). Globalization and development
dilemma: reflections from north east India. New Delhi:Mittal.
Brass, Paul R. (1991).Ethnicity and nationalism: Theory and
Comparison. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Chandhoke, Neera. (1995). State and civil society:
Explorations in political theory. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Das, N.K. (2007).Ethnicity, Nationalism and Regionalism in North-East India. In R.K. Bhadra and Mita Bhadra (Eds). Ethnicity, movement and social structure: Contested cultural identity. New Delhi: Rawat Publication, p.43.
Draper, Hal. (1977). Karl Marx's theory of revolution. Volume 1: State and bureaucracy. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Draper, Hal. (1986). Karl Marx's theory of revolution. Volume 2: The politics of social classes. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Ehrenberg, John. (1999).Civil society: The critical history of an idea. New York: New York University Press, p.208.
Kofman, Eleanore & Y. Gillian. (Eds). (2003). Globalization:
Theory and practice. New York: Continuum International
Publishing Group.
Lenin, V.I. (2010). Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. London: Penguin.
Mukhim, Patricia. (2008, September 15). Business in the north east. The Telegraph.
Nongkhlaw, Sita. (2011). Politics of pressure groups: A study of student and youth organisation in Meghalaya. Guwahati:
DVS Publishers.
Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert & Nanetti, Raffaella Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Rajput, Namita & Dutta, Mohua. (2011, April). Special economic zone or special exploitation zone: An analytical perspective (case: Singur in West Bengal), Asia- Pacific Journal of Management : Research and Innovation, Vol.7, No.2, pp.170-177.
Scholte, Jan Aart. (2000). Globalization-A critical introduction, London : Macmillan.
Sen Gupta, Susmita. (2005). Regionalism in Meghalaya. New Delhi: South Asian Publishers.
Shira, Mac. D. (2008, August 25). N-Deal and
Meghalaya’s atoms for peace. In The Shillong Times, p.4.
The Shillong Times. (2008,August 22). Politics of representation. Editorial.
The Shillong Times. (2008, August 23).Centre prods state
on uranium project. p.1.
The Shillong Times. ( 2008, August 23). KSU sticks to stand; other NGOs go soft, p.1.
The Shillong Times. ( 2008, August 24).Two MPA allies continue to oppose uranium mining, p.1.
The Shillong Times. ( 2008,August 29). State rolls out red carpet to investor, p.1.
The Shillong Times. (2008, September 16). Roy promises sops for investors, p.1.
Weiner, Myron. (1978). Sons of the soil: Migration and ethnic conflict in India. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
UK Government. (2000).White paper on globalization.
Zaleski, Pawel Stefan (2008). Tocqueville on civilian society: A romantic vision of the dichotomic structure of social reality. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte (Felix Meiner Verlag) 50.