Journal of Social and Political
Sciences
ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)
ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)
Published: 18 February 2022
Exploring Socio-Cultural Identity: Characteristics of the Architectural Design of Kori Agung Bangli
Ida Bagus Gde Wirawibawa, I Dewa Gede Agung Diasana Putra, Anak Agung Ngurah Aritama
Udayana University, Indonesia
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1991.05.01.335
Pages: 50-59
Keywords: Architecture, Characteristics, Kori Agung, Bangli
Abstract
The existence of vernacular architecture has given characteristics to the built environment and area. Vernacular architecture has became into a distinct personality that differentiates one location from another. Bangli architecture is one of the various kinds of architecture that evolved in Bali. Bangli architectural style has evolved from the 15th century to the 18th century AD. The characteristics of Bangli's distinctive architectural design can be seen in the main entrance building called kori agung. Today the architectural style in Bangli began to be replaced by the entry of other architectural styles in the surrounding area. For this reason, documentation efforts are needed to explore the identity and characteristics of Bangli architectural design. This article describes the identification of Bangli's architectural style characteristics through the kori agung as an object of the investigation. Data collection was carried out through field measurements, interviews and historical literacy. Architectural inspection techniques and graphical analysis are used in the analytical method, with architectural drawings and forms serving as the primary instruments. As a result, drawings, sketches and visual analyses are used to describe the architectural qualities of kori agung, which are typical of Bangli.
References
Achmadi, A. (2007). The architecture of Balinisation: writings on architecture, the villages, and the construction of Balinese cultural identity in the 20th century. Unviersity of Melbourne Australia.
Amundsen, A. B. (2001). Articulations of identity: A methodological essay and a report on Askim and Tidaholm. NoordXXI Report No. 19. Retrieved from – Http -//Www. Noordxxi.Nl/.
Aritama, A. A. N., & Putra, I. D. G. A. D. (2021). Tourism Activities in the Traditional Balinese House: The Challenges of Designing a Homestay in Gianyar Bali. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.04.01.250
Eiseman Jr, F. (1989). Sekala and niskala: essays on religious, ritual and art, vol. I. Periplus Editions.
Gelebet, I. N. (1998). Arsitektur Tradisional Bali (Balinese Traditional Architecture). Bappeda Bali.
Hobart, M. (1978). The path of the soul: the legitimacy of nature in Balinese conceptions of space. Natural Symbols in South East Asia, 5–28.
Lozanovska, M. (2002). Architectural frontier/spatial story: the problematic of representing the everyday. Space and Culture, 5(2), 140–151.
Piutanti, R. (2015). Pemaknaan Kembali Kearifan Lokal dalam Arsitektur (Keterkaitan Manusia, Budaya dan Alam Nusantara). Seminar Nasional SCAN#6:2015 “Finding The Fifth Elemen After Water, Earth, Wind, and Fire” Local Wisdom and Cultural Sustainability, 13–21.
Putra, I. D. G. A. D., Lozanovska, M., & Fuller, R. (2019). From spiritualistic toward more pragmatic pattern: Re-ordering Balinese houses and viability of the household traditions in tourism economy. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.3692
Satria, M. W., & Putra, I. D. G. A. D. (2020). The Kori Agung Character of Heritage Temples: The Architectural References of Klungkung Identity. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 3(1).
Suryada, I. G. A. B. (2012). Ornamen-ornamen Bermotif Kedok Wajah dalam Seni Arsitektur Tradisional Bali.
Utami, Akbar, I. F., Haerani, P. N., & Despriansyah, R. (2013). Kajian Bentuk dan Fasade Hotel Hilton Bandung. Reka Karsa. Reka Karsa, 1(1), 1–10.
Wikarman, I. N. S. (2013). Bangli Tempo Doeloe (Dalam Kajian Sejarah). Bangli. Yayasan Wikarman.
Wirawibawa, I. B. G., Putra, I. D. G. A. D., & Dwijendra, N. K. A. (2021). “Memada-mada”: The power relation and architectural creativity of gianyar palace. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(3), 949–957. https://doi.org/10.13189/CEA.2021.090336