top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political


ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
open access

Published: 11 July 2024

From Bureaucracy into Political Office: How Regional Secretary Staging Up to Political Post in North Lombok

Arif Budiman, Yuwanto, Nur Hidayat, Laila Kholid Alfirdaus

Diponegoro University, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf



Pages: 14-25

Keywords: Bureaucracy, Regional Secretary, Key Political Actors


Bureaucrats are active political actors. Along with their administrative role, they have their own political interests. Through a qualitative-phenomenological approach, this research aims to discover the strategies of regional secretary in staging up its role from high administrative official to political post at the regional level. Primary data were collected through interviews with key participants, while secondary data was obtained through searching libraries, archives, and documents relevant to the research subject. The data obtained is then organized, sorted, selected, and analyzed both textural description and structural description through source triangulation methodology and member check validation. The research findings indicate that the regional secretary has political advantage due to its extensive authority that covers nearly all aspects of administrative governance. This authority serves as a fundamental foundation for shaping self-image and performance, particularly in the endeavor of transforming the position from high administrative officials to political roles. However, this position does not significantly impact the success of the transformation unless supported by key political actors.


  1. Alamsyah. (2003). Politik dan Birokrasi: Reposisi Peran Birokrasi Publik dalam Proses Politik Lokal (Politics and Bureaucracy: Reposition of Public Bureaucracy Role in Local Politics Process). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 55-70

  2. Alfirdaus, L. K., & Manalu, R. (2020). The Politics of Local Government Environmental Evaluations: Assessing Bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia. Pacific Journalism Review: Te Koakoa, 26(2), 72-87,

  3. Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and The State in Indonesia. New York: Cornell University Press

  4. Brierly, S. A. (2017). Politicians and Bureaucrats: The Politics of Development and Corruption in Ghana. Dissertation at Departement of Political Science University of California, Los Angeles.

  5. Chairullah, et al. (2022). Relevansi Politik Kekuasaan dan Kinerja Birokrasi Pasca Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Aceh Barat Periode 2017-2022 di Dinas Kesehatan (Relevance of Political Power and Bureaucratic Performance Post the Election of the Regent and Deputy Regent of West Aceh 2017-2022 in the Health Department). Jurnal Kajian Pemerintah, 8(2), 53-64

  6. Clerk, N. T. (1972). Bureaucracy and The One-Party State: Politics and Administrative Transformation in Ghana. Dissertation at the Faculty of the School of Public Administration, University of Southern California.


  8. Effendi, W. R. (2018). Dinasti Politik dalam Pemerintahan Lokal: Studi Kasus Dinasti Kota Banten (Dynasty Politics in Local Government: A Case Study of Banten Dynasty). Jurnal Trias Politika, 2(2), 233-247

  9. Farhan, Y. (2013). Menelusuri Siklus Politisasi Anggaran pada Tahun Pemilu (Tracing the Budget Politicization Cycle in Election Years). PERLUDEM Jurnal Pemilu dan Demokrasi, 5, 29-48.

  10. Firnas, M. A., &; Maesarini, I.W. (2011). Evaluasi Reformasi Birokrasi: Masalah Politisasi Birokrasi dalam Politik Indonesia (Evaluation of Bureaucratic Reform: Issues of Bureaucratic Politicization in Indonesian Politics). Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS ‘Civil Service’, 5(2), 20-35

  11. Firnas, M. A. (2016). Politik dan Birokrasi: Masalah Netralitas Birokrasi di Indonesia Era Reformasi (Politics and Bureaucracy: Neutrality Issues on Indonesian Bureaucracy in Reform Era). Jurnal Review Politik, 6(01), 160-194

  12. Fregetto, E.F. (1997). Economic, Political, and Bureaucratic Factors Influencing a Public Agency’s Contract Decisions. Dissertation at the Graduate College of the University of Illinois Chicago.


  14. Golden, M., & Min, B. (2013). Distributive Politics Around the World. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 73-99,

  15. Gunanto, D. (2020). Politisasi Birokrasi dalam Pelaksanaan Pilkada di Indonesia (Bureaucratic Politicization in the Implementation of Local Elections in Indonesia). Jurnal IndependenUniversity of Muhammadiyah Jakarta, 1(2), 87-94

  16. Hamid, A. (2011). Politisasi Birokrasi dalam Pilkada Banten 2006. (Bureaucratic Politicization in the Banten Regional Elections 2006) Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (JIANA), 11(2), 97-110,

  17. Hartini, S., Kadarsih, S., & Sudrajat, T. (2014). Kebijakan Netralitas Politik Pegawai Negeri Sipil dalam Pemilukada: Studi di Jawa Tengah (Political Neutrality Policy of Civil Servants on Local Elections: A Study in Central Java). Jurnal PJIH Padjadjaran University, 1(3), 537-557,

  18. Hidayat, F. (2021). Politisasi Birokrasi: Analisis Dampak Inkonsistensi Interpretasi Makna Pasal dalam Undang-Undang Aparatur Sipil Negara (Buraucracy Politicization: Impact Analysis on Civil Servants Law Inconsistencies). Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja, 14(2), 11-21,

  19. Hughes, O. E. (1994). Public Management and Administration, an Introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press Inc.

  20. Humau, F.B.R. (2022). Partisipasi Politik Kaum Minoritas di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Birokrasi Pemerintahan Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara dalam Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Kabupaten TTU Tahun 2020 (Minority Group Political Participation in Indonesia: A Case Study on Timor Tengah Utara Bureaucracy amid Local Election 2020). Jurnal Politiconesia, 11(1), 47-53.

  21. Huque, A.S., & Rahman, M.T. (2003). From Dominance to Alliance: Shifting Strategies and Accumulation of Power by the Bureaucracy in Bangladesh. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 3, 403-418,

  22. Jati, W. R. (2012). Kultur Birokrasi Patrimonialisme dalam Pemerintah Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (Bureaucratic Patrimonialism in Yogyakarta). Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 8(2), 145-160,

  23. Kusuma Budi, M. W. (2014). Arah Baru Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara (New Directions in Bureaucratic Reform in Regional Head Elections Post Law Number 5 of 2014 Regarding the Civil Servant). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Islam Bandung, 4(1), 451-456

  24. Katharina, R. (2018). Reformasi Manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara: Evaluasi Peran Pejabat Pembina Kepegawaian dan Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara (Civil Servant Management Reform: Evaluation of the Role of Personnel Development Officers and the Civil Service Commission). Jurnal Spirit PublikSebelas Maret University, 13(2), 1-15, 13(2), 1-15,

  25. Kuipers. N. P. (2022). Meritocracy Reconsidered: The Politics of Civil Service Recruitment. Dissertation at Political Science Department, the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley University.


  27. Mahdiana, N., & Wishnu. (2018). Politisasi KORPRI pada Pemilu Orde Baru Tahun 1970-1998 di Jawa Timur (KORPRI Politicization during the Orde Baru Elections 1970-1998 in East Java). Jurnal AVATARAUnesa, 6(3), 48-62

  28. Mallarangeng, R. (2000). Liberalizing New Order Indonesia: Ideas, Epistemic Community, and Economic Policy Change. Dissertation at the Graduate School of the Ohio State University.

  29. Mujani, S., & Liddle, R.W. (2021). Indonesia: Jokowi Sidelines Democracy. Journal of Democracy 32(4), 72-86.

  30. Pananrangi, A., & Nippi, A. T. (2021). Tantangan Netralitas Birokrasi di Indonesia (Bureaucracy Neutrality Challenges in Indonesia). Jurnal Meraja, 4(1), 1-11,

  31. Power, T., Warburton, E. (2020) The Decline of Indonesian Democracy. In Power T, Warburton E (Eds). Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression. 1-20. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

  32. Pratama, R. A. (2017). Patronase dan Klientelisme pada Pilkada Serentak Kota Kendari Tahun 2017 (Patronage and Clientelism in Kendari City Local Election 2017). Jurnal Wacana Politik, 2(1), 33-45,

  33. Rakhmawanto, A. (2017). Perspektif Politisasi Birokrasi dan Peran Pejabat Pembina Kepegawaian dalam Birokrasi Pemerintah. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik (Perspectives on Bureaucratic Politicization and the Role of Personnel Administration Officers in Government Bureaucracy). Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 3(1), 19-32,

  34. Ratna, I. (2012). Reformasi Birokrasi Terhadap Penataan Pola Hubungan Jabatan Politik dan Karir Dalam Birokrasi di Lingkungan Pemerintah Provinsi Riau (Bureaucracy Reform on Rules of Politic and Bureaucracy Interrelation Organization in Riau Province). Jurnal Sosial Budaya, 9(1), 14-40,

  35. Saglam, E. (2022). Bureaucracies Under Authoritarian Pressure: Legal Destabilitation, Politication, and Bureaucratic Subjectivities in Contemporary Turkey. International Journal of Law in Context, 18(3), 288-302, doi:10.1017/S1744552322000234

  36. Sari, D. M. (2021). Regulasi Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Tahun 2020 (Civil Servant Law of Neutrality in Local Election 2020). Jurnal Kemudi, 5(2), 259-272,

  37. Sutrisno. (2019). Prinsip Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Civil Servants Neutrality Principle in Local Election). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(3), 521-543,

  38. Temple, L.P. III. (1999). Organizing Space: The Political-Bureaucratic Dynamics Through 1961. Dissertation at the Faculty of Columbian School of Arts and Sciences of the George Washington University.


  40. Van Gunten, T. S. (2012). Power and Pesos: Bureaucracy, Expertise, and the Politics of Money in Mexico and Argentina. Dissertation at Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.


  42. Wahiyuddin, L. O. (2014). Politisasi Pejabat Struktural Eselon II di Lingkungan Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Muna Sulawesi Tenggara (Politicization of Structural Officials at Level II within the Secretariat of the Regional Government of Muna Regency, Southeast Sulawesi). Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik, 18(1), 53-65,

  43. Warburton, E. (2020). Deepening Polarization and Democratic Decline in Indonesia. In Carothers, T., Donohue, EO. Political Polarization in South and Southeast Asia. 25-39. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

  44. Yamin, I., & Agustino, A. (2014). Demokrasi dan Kekuasaan Politik Petahana pada Pilkada Takalar 2007 (Democracy and Political Power of Incumbent in Takalar Local Election 2007). Jurnal Analisis PolitikAndalas University, 2(1), 1-10

bottom of page