top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 25 October 2023

Indonesia's Chairmanship of ASEAN 2023: Navigating Complex Security Challenges in Southeast Asia

Ludiro Madu, Yudhy Widya Kusumo

Universitas Pembangaunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.06.04.445

Pages: 60-69

Keywords: Indonesia, ASEAN, leadership, Myanmar crisis, South China Sea

Abstract

This paper delves into Indonesia's pivotal leadership role as the Chair of ASEAN in 2023, with a specific focus on its engagement with two paramount and pressing regional challenges: the Myanmar crisis and the South China Sea conflict. It illuminates Indonesia's approach, outcomes and explores the broader implications of its leadership within the context of ASEAN. The primary objective of this manuscript is to meticulously examine Indonesia's strategies and initiatives in effectively addressing these pivotal regional challenges during its tenure as the ASEAN Chair. It systematically explores Indonesia's capacity to navigate divisions among ASEAN member-states, effectively engage with non-cooperative actors, and uphold ASEAN's principles of neutrality and centrality. The results of this paper illuminate Indonesia's multifaceted role in tackling the Myanmar crisis, underscoring its diplomatic acumen, principled stance, and the formidable challenges it confronts. Likewise, in the context of the South China Sea conflict, this research critically evaluates Indonesia's leadership in facilitating dialogue, championing a code of conduct, and emphasizing the imperative of adherence to international law. The paper concludes by underscoring the pivotal importance of Indonesia's leadership in building the future stability of Southeast Asia. It accentuates Indonesia's balance between diplomatic engagement, principled leadership, and fidelity to ASEAN's guiding principles. This paper contributes significantly to the ongoing discourse surrounding ASEAN's intricate political and security dynamics and spotlights Indonesia's central position within this influential organization.

References

  1. Acharya, A. (1997). Ideas, identity, and institution‐building: From the ‘ASEAN way’ to the ‘Asia‐Pacific way’’?’ The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749708719226

  2. Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order, third edition. In Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia, Asean and the Problem of Regional Order, Third edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315796673

  3. Acharya, A. (2021). ASEAN and Regional Order: Revisiting Security Community in Southeast Asia. Routledge.

  4. Agusman, D. D. (2023). Natuna Waters : Explaining a Flashpoint between Indonesia and China. 20(4). https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol20.4.1

  5. Aiza Azam and Adil Sultan. (2023). U.S. Posture of Integrated Deterrence: China’s Response and Implications for the Asian Security. Strategic Studies, 43(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.53532/ss.043.01.00282

  6. Anwar, D. F. (2020). Indonesia and the ASEAN outlook on the Indo-Pacific. International Affairs, 96(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz223

  7. Anwar, D. F. (2023). Indonesia’s hedging plus policy in the face of China’s rise and the US-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific region. The Pacific Review, 36(2), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2160794

  8. Ardhani, I., Nandyatama, R. W., & Alvian, R. A. (2023). Middle power legitimation strategies: the case of Indonesia and the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2228709

  9. Azis, A. A., Indraswari, F. V., Khatimah, A. R., & Azzahra, A. Q. F. (2023). Indonesia’s Approach towards Myanmar’s Crisis: Understanding the Different Perspectives of the Democracy Process in Indonesia and Myanmar and the Role of the Military. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 12(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v12i1.17997

  10. Aziz, S. N. A., & Basir, S. M. (2022). South China Sea: ASEAN Mechanism on Maritime Disputes and the Rise of Indo Pacific Region. Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 9(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/JTMS.9.2.65

  11. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Method. Oxford University Press (OUP).

  12. Caballero-Anthony, M., & Emmers, R. (2022). Keeping the peace in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the quest for positive peace. The Pacific Review, 35(6), 1079–1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2075440

  13. Chairman’s Statement. (2023). The ASEAN Post Ministerial Conference (PMC) 10+1 Sessions With the Dialogue Partners and Trilateral Meeting. https://asean2023.id/storage/news/FINAL-Chairmans-Statement-PMC-101-with-DPs-and-Trilateral-.pdf

  14. Chambers, P., & Bunyavejchewin, P. (2023). Complex Positioning: Thailand’s Role in the Context of ASEAN “Centrality” and Indo-Pacific Security. In ASEAN and Regional Actors in the Indo-Pacific (pp. 17–37). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4020-2_2

  15. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

  16. Dar, A. I. (2019). John J. Mearsheimer. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. Asian Affairs, 50(1), 130–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2019.1567117

  17. Desker, B. (2015). Is Indonesia Outgrowing Asean? The Brunei Times. http://www.bt.com.bn/opinion/2010/09/30/indonesia-outgrowing-asean (accessed 16 January 2015).

  18. Drajat, G. M. (2018). Assessing Indonesia’s Leadership in the Advancement of ASEAN Political-Security Community under President Joko Widodo. AEGIS : Journal of International Relations, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33021/aegis.v2i2.424

  19. Editorial. (2021). Brunei’s disastrous mission. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2021/06/09/bruneis-disastrous-mission.html

  20. Emmers, R. (2014a). ASEAN’s Search for Neutrality in the South China Sea. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 2(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.18588/201405.000019

  21. Emmers, R. (2014b). Indonesia’s role in ASEAN: A case of incomplete and sectorial leadership. Pacific Review, 27(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.924230

  22. Farhana, F. (2022). Chairmanship in Asean: Lesson Learned for Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 19(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v19i2.1253

  23. Freundlieb, M. (2019). A Constructivist Approach to Chinese Interest Formation in the South China Sea. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2019/02/02/a-constructivist-approach-to-chinese-interest-formation-in-the-south-china-sea/

  24. Haacke, J. (2009). The ASEAN Regional Forum: from dialogue to practical security cooperation? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903104057

  25. Haacke, J. (2023). ASEAN and conflict management. In J. Dosch & F. Kliem (Eds.), The Elgar companion to ASEAN (pp. 76-93.). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  26. Haftel, Y. Z. (2010). Conflict, Regional Cooperation, and Foreign Capital: Indonesian Foreign Policy and the Formation of ASEAN. Foreign Policy Analysis, 6(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00103.x

  27. Haosheng, D., & Yunkang, L. (2023). Beyond Non-Interference: The Improved ASEAN Humanitarian-assistance Mechanism to Respond to the Myanmar Crisis. Asia Social Issues, 16(2), e254879. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2023.254879

  28. Heiduk, F. (2016). Indonesia in ASEAN: Regional Leadership between Ambition and Ambiguity. In SWP Research Paper (Issue 6). https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/research_papers/2016RP06_hdk.pdf

  29. Inkiriwang, F. W. (2021). Multilateral Naval Exercise Komodo: Enhancing Indonesia’s Multilateral Defence Diplomacy? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(3), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211008905

  30. Irene, Anak Agung Perwita, B., & Mahroza, J. (2023). Indonesia’s Responding The Escalation Of Aukus In The Indo-Pacific. 3, 8629–8640.

  31. Julianto, F. (2022). The ‘Expected Leadership’ in Indonesia’s Initiative to Form ASEAN Peacekeeping Centres Network. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 11(2), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v11i2.14952

  32. Karim, M. F. (2017). Role conflict and the limits of state identity: the case of Indonesia in democracy promotion. The Pacific Review, 30(3), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1249908

  33. Karim, M. F. (2023). Role conflict in International Relations: the case of Indonesia’s regional and global engagements. International Relations, 37(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211073880

  34. Koga, K. (2018). ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy: Managing great power politics in South China sea disputes. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/CJIP/POX016

  35. Koga, K. (2022). Getting ASEAN Right in US Indo-Pacific Strategy. The Washington Quarterly, 45(4), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2149952

  36. Lin, J. (2022). Is ASEAN’s Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Becoming A Farce?www.iseas.edu.sg

  37. Medail, C., Wells, T., & Seto, G. (2023). Myanmar in 2022: The Conflict Escalates. In Southeast Asian Affairs 2023 (pp. 196–216). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

  38. Muhamad, M. (2023). Myanmar Crisis Resolution Dead End, What Can Indonesia Do? Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/baca/english/2023/07/16/en-penyelesaian-krisis-myanmar-buntu-apa-yang-bisa-dilakukan-indonesia

  39. Odgaard, L. (2003). The South China Sea: ASEAN’s Security Concerns about China. Security Dialogue, 34(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106030341003

  40. Ong, A. (2023). Peace Studies in Myanmar: Interweaving Regional Geopolitics and Local Dynamics. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 11(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.18588/202305.00a339

  41. Pattiradjawane, R. L. (2016). The Indonesian perspective toward rising China. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1(3), 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891116646226

  42. Pradana, R. A., & Darmawan, W. B. (2023). Indonesia-ASEAN Institutional Roles and Challenges in the Crisis of the Liberal Order. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, 7(2), 575. https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v7n2.9

  43. Ramadhani, M. (2015). An Indonesian Perspective Toward Maritime Vision : Is Pursuing National Interest While Maintaining Neutrality in the South China Sea Possible ? European Scientific Journal, Special ed(November), 381–400.

  44. Ramadhony, F., & Firmansyah, Y. (2022). Road To Indonesia ASEAN Chairmanship 2023: Indonesia Foreign Policy Pattern In ASEAN. Moestopo International Review on Social, Humanities, and Sciences, 2(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v2i2.35

  45. Rizani, N. (2021). ASEAN Way: Managing Expectation in the Code of Conduct for the South China Sea. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 23(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v23i2.666

  46. Roberts, C. B., & Widyaningsih, E. (2015). Indonesian Leadership in ASEAN: Mediation, Agency and Extra-Regional Diplomacy. In Indonesia’s Ascent (pp. 264–286). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397416_13

  47. Sack, B. J. (2022). The Political Geography of the South China Sea Disputes. In Perspective. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PEA2000/PEA2021-1/RAND_PEA2021-1.pdf

  48. Sambhi, N. (2023). Indonesia’s Indo-Pacific Aspirations and the Reality of Its (Non)strategy. Asia Policy, 30(3), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.a903863

  49. Sari, A. C. (2023). Myanmar crisis highlights limits of Indonesia’s ‘quiet diplomacy’ as it sets sights on becoming a ‘great regional power.’https://theconversation.com/myanmar-crisis-highlights-limits-of-indonesias-quiet-diplomacy-as-it-sets-sights-on-becoming-a-great-regional-power-209291

  50. Sebastian, L. C. (2013). Indonesia ’ s Dynamic Equilibrium and ASEAN Centrality. ASEAN Political and Security Community (APSC) Blueprint.

  51. Sukma, R. (2009). Indonesia Needs a Post-ASEAN Foreign Policy. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/06/30/indonesia-needs-a-postasean-foreign-policy.html

  52. Sukma, R. (2011). Indonesia Finds a New Voice. Journal of Democracy, 22(4), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0057

  53. Suzuki, S. (2019). Why is ASEAN not intrusive? Non-interference meets state strength. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 8(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2019.1681652

  54. Teo, S. (2022). Middle powers amid Sino-U.S. rivalry: assessing the ‘good regional citizenship’ of Australia and Indonesia. The Pacific Review, 35(6), 1135–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2075444

  55. Thao, N. H. (2023). South China Sea: Battle of the Diplomatic Notes among China and Non-Claimant States. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy, 8(1), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.1163/24519391-08010007

  56. Umar, A. R. M., & Santoso, Y. N. (2023). AUKUS and Southeast Asia’s Ontological Security Dilemma. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207020231197767

  57. Väyrynen, R. (2022). Stable Peace Through Security Communities? Steps Towards Theory-Building. In A Pioneer in International Relations, Scholarship and Policy-Making (pp. 345–365). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13627-6_13

  58. Vershinina, V. V., Koldunova, E. V., & Kuklin, N. S. (2023). Southeast Asian States’ Approaches to Peacekeeping and Conflict Resolution. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 23(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-2-265-277

  59. Wardhani, B., & Dugis, V. (2023). Indonesian Foreign Policy under the Jokowi Administration: Variations on Traditional Ideas. Issues & Studies. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013251123500054

  60. Wicaksana, I. G. W. (2023). Indonesia’s Foreign Policy: The Need for a New Approach. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2023, 136–146. muse.jhu.edu/article/895951

  61. Wicaksana, I. G. W., Nauvarian, D., & Pramudia, P. S. (2023). ASEAN, COVID-19 and Myanmar crisis: Dealing with critical juncture. International Area Studies Review, 26(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/22338659221151129

  62. Yoshimatsu, H. (2023a). ASEAN and Great Power Rivalry in Regionalism: From East Asia to the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 42(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034221139297

  63. Yoshimatsu, H. (2023b). Meanings, norms, and social constitution: revisiting ASEAN centrality in East Asian regionalism. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109923000257

  64. Zhang, J. (2023). Rebuilding strategic autonomy: ASEAN’s response to US–China strategic competition. China International Strategy Review, 5(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-023-00128-3

  65. Zhou, Z. (2020). Liberalism As Scholasticism:An Explanation for the Decline of Liberal International Order. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3568829

bottom of page